Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness research in critically ill patients: risks associated with mischaracterising usual care
Comparative effectiveness research can help guide the use of common, routine medical practices. However, to be safe and informative, such trials must include at least one treatment arm that accurately portrays current practices. While comparative effectiveness research is widely perceived as safe an...
Autores principales: | Applefeld, Willard N., Wang, Jeffrey, Klein, Harvey G., Danner, Robert L., Eichacker, Peter Q., Natanson, Charles |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32389103 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2020.2.r1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Modeling current practices in critical care comparative effectiveness research
por: Applefeld, Willard N., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Medical Guidelines and Performance Measures: The Need to Keep Them Free of Industry Influence
por: Eichacker, Peter Q., et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Usual Care and Informed Consent in Clinical Trials of Oxygen Management in Extremely Premature Infants
por: Cortés-Puch, Irene, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Growing insights into the potential benefits and risks of activated protein C administration in sepsis: a review of preclinical and clinical studies
por: Altaweel, Laith, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Stress response during early sedation with dexmedetomidine compared with usual-care in ventilated critically ill patients
por: Moore, John P. R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)