Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for patients with early septic shock. Design: Within-trial cost-effectiveness evaluation. Setting: Nineteen hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Participants and interventions: Patients with early septic shock en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higgins, Alisa M., Peake, Sandra L., Rinaldo Bellomo, A.O., AO, D. Jamie Cooper, Delaney, Anthony, Howe, Belinda D., Nichol, Alistair D., Webb, Steve A., Williams, Patricia J., Harris, Anthony H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046082
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2021.3.OA10
_version_ 1785152960278298624
author Higgins, Alisa M.
Peake, Sandra L.
Rinaldo Bellomo, A.O.
AO, D. Jamie Cooper
Delaney, Anthony
Howe, Belinda D.
Nichol, Alistair D.
Webb, Steve A.
Williams, Patricia J.
Harris, Anthony H.
author_facet Higgins, Alisa M.
Peake, Sandra L.
Rinaldo Bellomo, A.O.
AO, D. Jamie Cooper
Delaney, Anthony
Howe, Belinda D.
Nichol, Alistair D.
Webb, Steve A.
Williams, Patricia J.
Harris, Anthony H.
author_sort Higgins, Alisa M.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for patients with early septic shock. Design: Within-trial cost-effectiveness evaluation. Setting: Nineteen hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Participants and interventions: Patients with early septic shock enrolled in the Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE) trial were randomly assigned to EGDT versus usual care. A subgroup of patients participated in a nested economic evaluation study in which detailed resource use data were collected until 12 months after randomisation. Outcome measures: Clinical outcomes included lives saved, life-years gained and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with mortality collected until 12 months and health-related quality of life assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months using the 3-level EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). Economic outcomes included health care resource use, costs and cost-effectiveness from the Australian health care payer perspective. Results: A total of 205 patients (100 EGDT, 105 usual care) participated in the nested economic evaluation study, of which 203 had complete resource use data. Unadjusted mean health care costs to 12 months were $67 223 (standard deviation [SD], $72 397) in the EGDT group and $54 179 (SD, $61 980) in the usual care group, with a mean difference of $13 044 (95% CI, –$5791 to $31 878). There was no difference between groups with regards to lives saved (EGDT, 69.4% v usual care, 68.6%; P = 1.0), life-years gained (mean EGDT, 0.746 [SD, 0.406] v usual care, 0.725 [SD, 0.417]; P = 0.72) or QALYs (mean EGDT, 0.318 [SD, 0.291] v usual care, 0.367 [SD, 0.295]; P = 0.24). EGDT was dominated (higher costs, lower effectiveness) by usual care in 80.4% of bootstrap replications. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY, the probability of EGDT being cost-effective was only 6.4%. Conclusions: In patients presenting to the emergency department with early septic shock, EGDT compared with usual care was not cost-effective. Clinical trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00975793.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106925222023-12-03 The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial Higgins, Alisa M. Peake, Sandra L. Rinaldo Bellomo, A.O. AO, D. Jamie Cooper Delaney, Anthony Howe, Belinda D. Nichol, Alistair D. Webb, Steve A. Williams, Patricia J. Harris, Anthony H. Crit Care Resusc Original Article Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for patients with early septic shock. Design: Within-trial cost-effectiveness evaluation. Setting: Nineteen hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Participants and interventions: Patients with early septic shock enrolled in the Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE) trial were randomly assigned to EGDT versus usual care. A subgroup of patients participated in a nested economic evaluation study in which detailed resource use data were collected until 12 months after randomisation. Outcome measures: Clinical outcomes included lives saved, life-years gained and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), with mortality collected until 12 months and health-related quality of life assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months using the 3-level EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). Economic outcomes included health care resource use, costs and cost-effectiveness from the Australian health care payer perspective. Results: A total of 205 patients (100 EGDT, 105 usual care) participated in the nested economic evaluation study, of which 203 had complete resource use data. Unadjusted mean health care costs to 12 months were $67 223 (standard deviation [SD], $72 397) in the EGDT group and $54 179 (SD, $61 980) in the usual care group, with a mean difference of $13 044 (95% CI, –$5791 to $31 878). There was no difference between groups with regards to lives saved (EGDT, 69.4% v usual care, 68.6%; P = 1.0), life-years gained (mean EGDT, 0.746 [SD, 0.406] v usual care, 0.725 [SD, 0.417]; P = 0.72) or QALYs (mean EGDT, 0.318 [SD, 0.291] v usual care, 0.367 [SD, 0.295]; P = 0.24). EGDT was dominated (higher costs, lower effectiveness) by usual care in 80.4% of bootstrap replications. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY, the probability of EGDT being cost-effective was only 6.4%. Conclusions: In patients presenting to the emergency department with early septic shock, EGDT compared with usual care was not cost-effective. Clinical trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00975793. Elsevier 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10692522/ /pubmed/38046082 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2021.3.OA10 Text en © 2021 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Higgins, Alisa M.
Peake, Sandra L.
Rinaldo Bellomo, A.O.
AO, D. Jamie Cooper
Delaney, Anthony
Howe, Belinda D.
Nichol, Alistair D.
Webb, Steve A.
Williams, Patricia J.
Harris, Anthony H.
The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial
title The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial
title_full The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial
title_short The cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the ARISE trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy: an economic evaluation alongside the arise trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046082
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2021.3.OA10
work_keys_str_mv AT higginsalisam thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT peakesandral thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT rinaldobellomoao thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT aodjamiecooper thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT delaneyanthony thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT howebelindad thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT nicholalistaird thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT webbstevea thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT williamspatriciaj thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT harrisanthonyh thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT thecosteffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT higginsalisam costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT peakesandral costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT rinaldobellomoao costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT aodjamiecooper costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT delaneyanthony costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT howebelindad costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT nicholalistaird costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT webbstevea costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT williamspatriciaj costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT harrisanthonyh costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial
AT costeffectivenessofearlygoaldirectedtherapyaneconomicevaluationalongsidethearisetrial