Cargando…

Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study

Introduction: Violence in the intensive care unit (ICU) is poorly characterised and its incidence is largely extrapolated from studies in the emergency department. Policy requirements vary between jurisdictions and have not been formally evaluated. Methods: A multisite, single-time point observation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slack, Ryan J., French, Craig, McGain, Forbes, Bates, Samantha, Gao, Annie, Knowles, Serena, Yang, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046215
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA7
_version_ 1785152978247745536
author Slack, Ryan J.
French, Craig
McGain, Forbes
Bates, Samantha
Gao, Annie
Knowles, Serena
Yang, Yang
author_facet Slack, Ryan J.
French, Craig
McGain, Forbes
Bates, Samantha
Gao, Annie
Knowles, Serena
Yang, Yang
author_sort Slack, Ryan J.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Violence in the intensive care unit (ICU) is poorly characterised and its incidence is largely extrapolated from studies in the emergency department. Policy requirements vary between jurisdictions and have not been formally evaluated. Methods: A multisite, single-time point observational study was conducted across Australasian ICUs which focused on the incidence of violence in the previous 24 hours, the characteristics of patients displaying violent behaviour, the perceived contributors, and the management strategies implemented. Unit policies were surveyed across a range of domains relevant to violence management. Results: Data were available for 627 patients admitted to 44 ICUs on one of 2 days in June 2019. Four per cent (25/627) displayed at least one episode of violent behaviour in the previous 24 hours. Violent behaviour was more likely in individuals after a greater length of stay in hospital (incidence, 2%, 4% and 7% for day 0-2, 3-7 and > 7 days respectively; P = 0.01) and in the ICU (2%, 4% and 9% for day 0-2, 3-7 and > 7 of ICU stay respectively; P < 0.01). The most common perceived contributors to violence were confusion (64%), physical illness (40%), and psychiatric illness (34%). Management with chemical sedation (72%) and physical restraint (28%) was commonly required. Clinicians assessed an additional 53 patients (53/627, 9%) as at risk of displaying violence in the next 24 hours. Of the 44 participating ICUs, 30 (68%) had a documented violence procedure. Conclusion: Violence in the ICU was common and frequently required intervention. In this study, one-third of ICUs did not have formal violence procedures, and in those with violence procedures, considerable variation was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106926002023-12-03 Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study Slack, Ryan J. French, Craig McGain, Forbes Bates, Samantha Gao, Annie Knowles, Serena Yang, Yang Crit Care Resusc Original Articles Introduction: Violence in the intensive care unit (ICU) is poorly characterised and its incidence is largely extrapolated from studies in the emergency department. Policy requirements vary between jurisdictions and have not been formally evaluated. Methods: A multisite, single-time point observational study was conducted across Australasian ICUs which focused on the incidence of violence in the previous 24 hours, the characteristics of patients displaying violent behaviour, the perceived contributors, and the management strategies implemented. Unit policies were surveyed across a range of domains relevant to violence management. Results: Data were available for 627 patients admitted to 44 ICUs on one of 2 days in June 2019. Four per cent (25/627) displayed at least one episode of violent behaviour in the previous 24 hours. Violent behaviour was more likely in individuals after a greater length of stay in hospital (incidence, 2%, 4% and 7% for day 0-2, 3-7 and > 7 days respectively; P = 0.01) and in the ICU (2%, 4% and 9% for day 0-2, 3-7 and > 7 of ICU stay respectively; P < 0.01). The most common perceived contributors to violence were confusion (64%), physical illness (40%), and psychiatric illness (34%). Management with chemical sedation (72%) and physical restraint (28%) was commonly required. Clinicians assessed an additional 53 patients (53/627, 9%) as at risk of displaying violence in the next 24 hours. Of the 44 participating ICUs, 30 (68%) had a documented violence procedure. Conclusion: Violence in the ICU was common and frequently required intervention. In this study, one-third of ICUs did not have formal violence procedures, and in those with violence procedures, considerable variation was observed. Elsevier 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10692600/ /pubmed/38046215 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA7 Text en © 2022 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Slack, Ryan J.
French, Craig
McGain, Forbes
Bates, Samantha
Gao, Annie
Knowles, Serena
Yang, Yang
Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study
title Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study
title_full Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study
title_fullStr Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study
title_full_unstemmed Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study
title_short Violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study
title_sort violence in intensive care: a point prevalence study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046215
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA7
work_keys_str_mv AT slackryanj violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy
AT frenchcraig violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy
AT mcgainforbes violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy
AT batessamantha violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy
AT gaoannie violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy
AT knowlesserena violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy
AT yangyang violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy
AT violenceinintensivecareapointprevalencestudy