Cargando…

High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan

Background: The best way to offer non-invasive respiratory support across several aetiologies of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is presently unclear. Both high flow nasal catheter (HFNC) therapy and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may improve outcomes in critically ill patients b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maia, Israel S., Kawano-Dourado, Leticia, Zampieri, Fernando G., Damiani, Lucas P., Nakagawa, Renato H., Gurgel, Rodrigo M., Negrelli, Karina, Gomes, Samara P.C., Paisani, Denise, Lima, Lucas M., Santucci, Eliana V., Valeis, Nanci, Laranjeira, Ligia N., Lewis, Roger, Fitzgerald, Mark, Carvalho, Carlos R.R., Brochard, Laurent, Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046839
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.1.OA8
_version_ 1785152982715727872
author Maia, Israel S.
Kawano-Dourado, Leticia
Zampieri, Fernando G.
Damiani, Lucas P.
Nakagawa, Renato H.
Gurgel, Rodrigo M.
Negrelli, Karina
Gomes, Samara P.C.
Paisani, Denise
Lima, Lucas M.
Santucci, Eliana V.
Valeis, Nanci
Laranjeira, Ligia N.
Lewis, Roger
Fitzgerald, Mark
Carvalho, Carlos R.R.
Brochard, Laurent
Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
author_facet Maia, Israel S.
Kawano-Dourado, Leticia
Zampieri, Fernando G.
Damiani, Lucas P.
Nakagawa, Renato H.
Gurgel, Rodrigo M.
Negrelli, Karina
Gomes, Samara P.C.
Paisani, Denise
Lima, Lucas M.
Santucci, Eliana V.
Valeis, Nanci
Laranjeira, Ligia N.
Lewis, Roger
Fitzgerald, Mark
Carvalho, Carlos R.R.
Brochard, Laurent
Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
author_sort Maia, Israel S.
collection PubMed
description Background: The best way to offer non-invasive respiratory support across several aetiologies of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is presently unclear. Both high flow nasal catheter (HFNC) therapy and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may improve outcomes in critically ill patients by avoiding the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Objective: Describe the details of the protocol and statistical analysis plan designed to test whether HFNC therapy is non-inferior or even superior to NIPPV in patients with ARF due to different aetiologies. Methods: RENOVATE is a multicentre adaptive randomised controlled trial that is recruiting patients from adult emergency departments, wards and intensive care units (ICUs). It takes advantage of an adaptive Bayesian framework to assess the effectiveness of HFNC therapy versus NIPPV in four subgroups of ARF (hypoxaemic non-immunocompromised, hypoxaemic immunocompromised, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, and acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema). The study will report the posterior probabilities of non-inferiority, superiority or futility for the comparison between HFNC therapy and NIPPV. The study assumes neutral priors and the final sample size is not fixed. The final sample size will be determined by a priori determined stopping rules for non-inferiority, superiority and futility for each subgroup or by reaching the maximum of 2000 patients. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days. Secondary outcomes are 28-day and 90-day mortality, and ICU-free and IMV-free days in the first 28 days. Results and conclusions: RENOVATE is designed to provide evidence on whether HFNC therapy improves, compared with NIPPV, important patient-centred outcomes in different aetiologies of ARF. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03643939.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106926192023-12-03 High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan Maia, Israel S. Kawano-Dourado, Leticia Zampieri, Fernando G. Damiani, Lucas P. Nakagawa, Renato H. Gurgel, Rodrigo M. Negrelli, Karina Gomes, Samara P.C. Paisani, Denise Lima, Lucas M. Santucci, Eliana V. Valeis, Nanci Laranjeira, Ligia N. Lewis, Roger Fitzgerald, Mark Carvalho, Carlos R.R. Brochard, Laurent Cavalcanti, Alexandre B. Crit Care Resusc Original Articles Background: The best way to offer non-invasive respiratory support across several aetiologies of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is presently unclear. Both high flow nasal catheter (HFNC) therapy and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may improve outcomes in critically ill patients by avoiding the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Objective: Describe the details of the protocol and statistical analysis plan designed to test whether HFNC therapy is non-inferior or even superior to NIPPV in patients with ARF due to different aetiologies. Methods: RENOVATE is a multicentre adaptive randomised controlled trial that is recruiting patients from adult emergency departments, wards and intensive care units (ICUs). It takes advantage of an adaptive Bayesian framework to assess the effectiveness of HFNC therapy versus NIPPV in four subgroups of ARF (hypoxaemic non-immunocompromised, hypoxaemic immunocompromised, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, and acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema). The study will report the posterior probabilities of non-inferiority, superiority or futility for the comparison between HFNC therapy and NIPPV. The study assumes neutral priors and the final sample size is not fixed. The final sample size will be determined by a priori determined stopping rules for non-inferiority, superiority and futility for each subgroup or by reaching the maximum of 2000 patients. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is endotracheal intubation or death within 7 days. Secondary outcomes are 28-day and 90-day mortality, and ICU-free and IMV-free days in the first 28 days. Results and conclusions: RENOVATE is designed to provide evidence on whether HFNC therapy improves, compared with NIPPV, important patient-centred outcomes in different aetiologies of ARF. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03643939. Elsevier 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10692619/ /pubmed/38046839 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.1.OA8 Text en © 2022 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Maia, Israel S.
Kawano-Dourado, Leticia
Zampieri, Fernando G.
Damiani, Lucas P.
Nakagawa, Renato H.
Gurgel, Rodrigo M.
Negrelli, Karina
Gomes, Samara P.C.
Paisani, Denise
Lima, Lucas M.
Santucci, Eliana V.
Valeis, Nanci
Laranjeira, Ligia N.
Lewis, Roger
Fitzgerald, Mark
Carvalho, Carlos R.R.
Brochard, Laurent
Cavalcanti, Alexandre B.
High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan
title High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan
title_full High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan
title_fullStr High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan
title_full_unstemmed High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan
title_short High flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (RENOVATE trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan
title_sort high flow nasal catheter therapy versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure (renovate trial): protocol and statistical analysis plan
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046839
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.1.OA8
work_keys_str_mv AT maiaisraels highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT kawanodouradoleticia highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT zampierifernandog highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT damianilucasp highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT nakagawarenatoh highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT gurgelrodrigom highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT negrellikarina highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT gomessamarapc highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT paisanidenise highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT limalucasm highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT santuccielianav highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT valeisnanci highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT laranjeiraligian highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT lewisroger highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT fitzgeraldmark highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT carvalhocarlosrr highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT brochardlaurent highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT cavalcantialexandreb highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan
AT highflownasalcathetertherapyversusnoninvasivepositivepressureventilationinacuterespiratoryfailurerenovatetrialprotocolandstatisticalanalysisplan