Cargando…
Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study
Objective: To describe pain assessment and analgesic management practices in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Design, setting and participants: Prospective, observational, multicentre, single-day point prevalence study conducted in Australian and New Zealand ICUs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046214 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA1 |
_version_ | 1785152988074999808 |
---|---|
author | Moran, Benjamin L. Scott, David A. Holliday, Elizabeth Knowles, Serena Saxena, Manoj Seppelt, Ian Hammond, Naomi Myburgh, John A. |
author_facet | Moran, Benjamin L. Scott, David A. Holliday, Elizabeth Knowles, Serena Saxena, Manoj Seppelt, Ian Hammond, Naomi Myburgh, John A. |
author_sort | Moran, Benjamin L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To describe pain assessment and analgesic management practices in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Design, setting and participants: Prospective, observational, multicentre, single-day point prevalence study conducted in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Observational data were recorded for all adult patients admitted to an ICU without a neurological, neurosurgical or postoperative cardiac diagnosis. Demographic characteristics and data on pain assessment and analgesic management for a 24-hour period were collected. Main outcome measures: Types of pain assessment tools used and frequency of their use, use of opioid analgesia, use of adjuvant analgesia, and differences in pain assessment and analgesic management between postoperative and non-operative patients. Results: From the 499 patients enrolled from 45 ICUs, pain assessment was performed at least every 4 hours in 56% of patients (277/499), most commonly with a numerical rating scale. Overall, 286 patients (57%) received an opioid on the study day. Of the 181 mechanically ventilated patients, 135 (75%) received an intravenous opioid, with the predominant opioid infusion being fentanyl. The median dose of opioid infusion for ventilated patients was 140 mg oral morphine equivalents. Of the 318 non-ventilated patients, 41 (13%) received patient-controlled analgesia and 76 (24%) received an oral opioid, with the predominant opioid being oxycodone. Paracetamol was administered to 63 ventilated patients (35%) and 164 non-ventilated patients (52%), while 2% of all patients (11/499) received a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Ketamine infusion and regional analgesia were used in 15 patients (3%) and 17 patients (3%), respectively. Antineuropathic agents (predominantly gabapentinoids) were used in 53 patients (11%). Conclusions: Although a majority of ICU patients were frequently assessed for pain with a validated pain assessment tool, cumulative daily doses of opioids were high, and the use of multimodal adjuvant analgesia was low. Our data on current pain assessment and analgesic management practices may inform further research in this area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10692642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106926422023-12-03 Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study Moran, Benjamin L. Scott, David A. Holliday, Elizabeth Knowles, Serena Saxena, Manoj Seppelt, Ian Hammond, Naomi Myburgh, John A. Crit Care Resusc Original Articles Objective: To describe pain assessment and analgesic management practices in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Design, setting and participants: Prospective, observational, multicentre, single-day point prevalence study conducted in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Observational data were recorded for all adult patients admitted to an ICU without a neurological, neurosurgical or postoperative cardiac diagnosis. Demographic characteristics and data on pain assessment and analgesic management for a 24-hour period were collected. Main outcome measures: Types of pain assessment tools used and frequency of their use, use of opioid analgesia, use of adjuvant analgesia, and differences in pain assessment and analgesic management between postoperative and non-operative patients. Results: From the 499 patients enrolled from 45 ICUs, pain assessment was performed at least every 4 hours in 56% of patients (277/499), most commonly with a numerical rating scale. Overall, 286 patients (57%) received an opioid on the study day. Of the 181 mechanically ventilated patients, 135 (75%) received an intravenous opioid, with the predominant opioid infusion being fentanyl. The median dose of opioid infusion for ventilated patients was 140 mg oral morphine equivalents. Of the 318 non-ventilated patients, 41 (13%) received patient-controlled analgesia and 76 (24%) received an oral opioid, with the predominant opioid being oxycodone. Paracetamol was administered to 63 ventilated patients (35%) and 164 non-ventilated patients (52%), while 2% of all patients (11/499) received a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Ketamine infusion and regional analgesia were used in 15 patients (3%) and 17 patients (3%), respectively. Antineuropathic agents (predominantly gabapentinoids) were used in 53 patients (11%). Conclusions: Although a majority of ICU patients were frequently assessed for pain with a validated pain assessment tool, cumulative daily doses of opioids were high, and the use of multimodal adjuvant analgesia was low. Our data on current pain assessment and analgesic management practices may inform further research in this area. Elsevier 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10692642/ /pubmed/38046214 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA1 Text en © 2022 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Moran, Benjamin L. Scott, David A. Holliday, Elizabeth Knowles, Serena Saxena, Manoj Seppelt, Ian Hammond, Naomi Myburgh, John A. Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study |
title | Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study |
title_full | Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study |
title_fullStr | Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study |
title_short | Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study |
title_sort | pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an australian and new zealand point prevalence study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046214 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moranbenjaminl painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT scottdavida painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT hollidayelizabeth painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT knowlesserena painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT saxenamanoj painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT seppeltian painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT hammondnaomi painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT myburghjohna painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy AT painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy |