Cargando…

Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study

Objective: To describe pain assessment and analgesic management practices in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Design, setting and participants: Prospective, observational, multicentre, single-day point prevalence study conducted in Australian and New Zealand ICUs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moran, Benjamin L., Scott, David A., Holliday, Elizabeth, Knowles, Serena, Saxena, Manoj, Seppelt, Ian, Hammond, Naomi, Myburgh, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046214
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA1
_version_ 1785152988074999808
author Moran, Benjamin L.
Scott, David A.
Holliday, Elizabeth
Knowles, Serena
Saxena, Manoj
Seppelt, Ian
Hammond, Naomi
Myburgh, John A.
author_facet Moran, Benjamin L.
Scott, David A.
Holliday, Elizabeth
Knowles, Serena
Saxena, Manoj
Seppelt, Ian
Hammond, Naomi
Myburgh, John A.
author_sort Moran, Benjamin L.
collection PubMed
description Objective: To describe pain assessment and analgesic management practices in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Design, setting and participants: Prospective, observational, multicentre, single-day point prevalence study conducted in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Observational data were recorded for all adult patients admitted to an ICU without a neurological, neurosurgical or postoperative cardiac diagnosis. Demographic characteristics and data on pain assessment and analgesic management for a 24-hour period were collected. Main outcome measures: Types of pain assessment tools used and frequency of their use, use of opioid analgesia, use of adjuvant analgesia, and differences in pain assessment and analgesic management between postoperative and non-operative patients. Results: From the 499 patients enrolled from 45 ICUs, pain assessment was performed at least every 4 hours in 56% of patients (277/499), most commonly with a numerical rating scale. Overall, 286 patients (57%) received an opioid on the study day. Of the 181 mechanically ventilated patients, 135 (75%) received an intravenous opioid, with the predominant opioid infusion being fentanyl. The median dose of opioid infusion for ventilated patients was 140 mg oral morphine equivalents. Of the 318 non-ventilated patients, 41 (13%) received patient-controlled analgesia and 76 (24%) received an oral opioid, with the predominant opioid being oxycodone. Paracetamol was administered to 63 ventilated patients (35%) and 164 non-ventilated patients (52%), while 2% of all patients (11/499) received a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Ketamine infusion and regional analgesia were used in 15 patients (3%) and 17 patients (3%), respectively. Antineuropathic agents (predominantly gabapentinoids) were used in 53 patients (11%). Conclusions: Although a majority of ICU patients were frequently assessed for pain with a validated pain assessment tool, cumulative daily doses of opioids were high, and the use of multimodal adjuvant analgesia was low. Our data on current pain assessment and analgesic management practices may inform further research in this area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106926422023-12-03 Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study Moran, Benjamin L. Scott, David A. Holliday, Elizabeth Knowles, Serena Saxena, Manoj Seppelt, Ian Hammond, Naomi Myburgh, John A. Crit Care Resusc Original Articles Objective: To describe pain assessment and analgesic management practices in patients in intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand. Design, setting and participants: Prospective, observational, multicentre, single-day point prevalence study conducted in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. Observational data were recorded for all adult patients admitted to an ICU without a neurological, neurosurgical or postoperative cardiac diagnosis. Demographic characteristics and data on pain assessment and analgesic management for a 24-hour period were collected. Main outcome measures: Types of pain assessment tools used and frequency of their use, use of opioid analgesia, use of adjuvant analgesia, and differences in pain assessment and analgesic management between postoperative and non-operative patients. Results: From the 499 patients enrolled from 45 ICUs, pain assessment was performed at least every 4 hours in 56% of patients (277/499), most commonly with a numerical rating scale. Overall, 286 patients (57%) received an opioid on the study day. Of the 181 mechanically ventilated patients, 135 (75%) received an intravenous opioid, with the predominant opioid infusion being fentanyl. The median dose of opioid infusion for ventilated patients was 140 mg oral morphine equivalents. Of the 318 non-ventilated patients, 41 (13%) received patient-controlled analgesia and 76 (24%) received an oral opioid, with the predominant opioid being oxycodone. Paracetamol was administered to 63 ventilated patients (35%) and 164 non-ventilated patients (52%), while 2% of all patients (11/499) received a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Ketamine infusion and regional analgesia were used in 15 patients (3%) and 17 patients (3%), respectively. Antineuropathic agents (predominantly gabapentinoids) were used in 53 patients (11%). Conclusions: Although a majority of ICU patients were frequently assessed for pain with a validated pain assessment tool, cumulative daily doses of opioids were high, and the use of multimodal adjuvant analgesia was low. Our data on current pain assessment and analgesic management practices may inform further research in this area. Elsevier 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10692642/ /pubmed/38046214 http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA1 Text en © 2022 College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Moran, Benjamin L.
Scott, David A.
Holliday, Elizabeth
Knowles, Serena
Saxena, Manoj
Seppelt, Ian
Hammond, Naomi
Myburgh, John A.
Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study
title Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study
title_full Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study
title_fullStr Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study
title_full_unstemmed Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study
title_short Pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an Australian and New Zealand point prevalence study
title_sort pain assessment and analgesic management in patients admitted to intensive care: an australian and new zealand point prevalence study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046214
http://dx.doi.org/10.51893/2022.3.OA1
work_keys_str_mv AT moranbenjaminl painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT scottdavida painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT hollidayelizabeth painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT knowlesserena painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT saxenamanoj painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT seppeltian painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT hammondnaomi painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT myburghjohna painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy
AT painassessmentandanalgesicmanagementinpatientsadmittedtointensivecareanaustralianandnewzealandpointprevalencestudy