Cargando…
Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
BACKGROUND: Daily methadone maintenance or buprenorphine treatment is the standard-of-care (SoC) medication for opioid use disorder (OUD). Subcutaneously injected, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) may be more effective—but there has been no superiority evaluation. METHODS: This pragmatic, par...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102311 |
_version_ | 1785152991875039232 |
---|---|
author | Marsden, John Kelleher, Mike Gilvarry, Eilish Mitcheson, Luke Bisla, Jatinder Cape, Angela Cowden, Fiona Day, Edward Dewhurst, Jonathan Evans, Rachel Hardy, Will Hearn, Andrea Kelly, Joanna Lowry, Natalie McCusker, Martin Murphy, Caroline Murray, Robert Myton, Tracey Quarshie, Sophie Vanderwaal, Rob Wareham, April Hughes, Dyfrig Hoare, Zoë |
author_facet | Marsden, John Kelleher, Mike Gilvarry, Eilish Mitcheson, Luke Bisla, Jatinder Cape, Angela Cowden, Fiona Day, Edward Dewhurst, Jonathan Evans, Rachel Hardy, Will Hearn, Andrea Kelly, Joanna Lowry, Natalie McCusker, Martin Murphy, Caroline Murray, Robert Myton, Tracey Quarshie, Sophie Vanderwaal, Rob Wareham, April Hughes, Dyfrig Hoare, Zoë |
author_sort | Marsden, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Daily methadone maintenance or buprenorphine treatment is the standard-of-care (SoC) medication for opioid use disorder (OUD). Subcutaneously injected, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) may be more effective—but there has been no superiority evaluation. METHODS: This pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multi-centre, effectiveness superiority randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at five National Health Service community-based treatment clinics in England and Scotland. Participants (adults aged ≥ 18 years; all meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for moderate or severe OUD at admission to their current maintenance treatment episode) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive continued daily SoC (liquid methadone (usual dose range: 60–120 mg) or sublingual/transmucosal buprenorphine (usual dose range: 8–24 mg) for 24 weeks; or monthly BUP-XR (Sublocade;® two injections of 300 mg, then four maintenance injections of 100 mg or 300 mg, with maintenance dose selected by response and preference) for 24 weeks. In the intent-to-treat population (senior statistician blinded to blinded to treatment group allocation), and with a seven-day grace period after randomisation, the primary endpoint was the count of days abstinent from non-medical opioids between days 8–168 (i.e., weeks 2–24; range: 0–161 days). Safety was reported for the intention-to- treat population. Adopting a broad societal perspective inclusive of criminal justice, NHS and personal social service costs, a trial-based cost-utility analysis estimated the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of BUP-XR versus SoC at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold. The study was registered EudraCT (2018-004460-63) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05164549), and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 9, 2019 and Nov 2, 2021, 314 participants were randomly allocated to receive SoC (n = 156) or BUP-XR (n = 158). Participants were abstinent from opioids for an adjusted mean of 104.37 days (standard error [SE] 9.89; range: 0–161 days) in the SoC group and an adjusted mean of 123.43 days (SE 4.76; range: 24–161 days) in the BUP-XR group (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.33; p-value 0.004). The incidence of any adverse event was higher in the BUP-XR group than the SoC group (128 [81.0%] of 158 participants versus 67 [42.9%] of 156 participants, respectively—most commonly rapidly-resolving (mild–moderate range) pain from drug administration in the BUP-XR group (121 [26.9%] of 450 adverse events). There were 11 serious adverse events (7.0%) in the 158 participants in the BUP-XR group, and 18 serious adverse events (11.5%) in the 156 participants in the SoC group—none judged to be related to study treatment. The BUP-XR treatment group had a mean incremental cost of £1033 (95% central range [CR] −1189 to 3225) and was associated with a mean incremental QALY of 0.02 (95% CR 0.00–0.05), and an ICER of £47,540 (0.37 probability of being cost-effective at the £30,000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold). However, BUP-XR dominated the SoC among participants who were rated more severe at study baseline, and among participants in maintenance treatment for more that 28 days at study enrolment. INTERPRETATION: Evaluated against the daily oral SoC, monthly BUP-XR is clinically superior, delivering greater abstinence from opioids, and with a comparable safety profile. BUP-XR was not cost-effective in a base case cost-utility analysis using the societal perspective, but it was more effective and less costly (dominant) among participants with more severe OUD, or those whose current treatment episode was longer than 28 days. Further trials are needed to evaluate if BUP-XR is associated with better clinical and health economic outcomes over the longer term. FUNDING: Indivior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10692661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106926612023-12-03 Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial Marsden, John Kelleher, Mike Gilvarry, Eilish Mitcheson, Luke Bisla, Jatinder Cape, Angela Cowden, Fiona Day, Edward Dewhurst, Jonathan Evans, Rachel Hardy, Will Hearn, Andrea Kelly, Joanna Lowry, Natalie McCusker, Martin Murphy, Caroline Murray, Robert Myton, Tracey Quarshie, Sophie Vanderwaal, Rob Wareham, April Hughes, Dyfrig Hoare, Zoë eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Daily methadone maintenance or buprenorphine treatment is the standard-of-care (SoC) medication for opioid use disorder (OUD). Subcutaneously injected, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) may be more effective—but there has been no superiority evaluation. METHODS: This pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multi-centre, effectiveness superiority randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at five National Health Service community-based treatment clinics in England and Scotland. Participants (adults aged ≥ 18 years; all meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for moderate or severe OUD at admission to their current maintenance treatment episode) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive continued daily SoC (liquid methadone (usual dose range: 60–120 mg) or sublingual/transmucosal buprenorphine (usual dose range: 8–24 mg) for 24 weeks; or monthly BUP-XR (Sublocade;® two injections of 300 mg, then four maintenance injections of 100 mg or 300 mg, with maintenance dose selected by response and preference) for 24 weeks. In the intent-to-treat population (senior statistician blinded to blinded to treatment group allocation), and with a seven-day grace period after randomisation, the primary endpoint was the count of days abstinent from non-medical opioids between days 8–168 (i.e., weeks 2–24; range: 0–161 days). Safety was reported for the intention-to- treat population. Adopting a broad societal perspective inclusive of criminal justice, NHS and personal social service costs, a trial-based cost-utility analysis estimated the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of BUP-XR versus SoC at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold. The study was registered EudraCT (2018-004460-63) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05164549), and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 9, 2019 and Nov 2, 2021, 314 participants were randomly allocated to receive SoC (n = 156) or BUP-XR (n = 158). Participants were abstinent from opioids for an adjusted mean of 104.37 days (standard error [SE] 9.89; range: 0–161 days) in the SoC group and an adjusted mean of 123.43 days (SE 4.76; range: 24–161 days) in the BUP-XR group (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.33; p-value 0.004). The incidence of any adverse event was higher in the BUP-XR group than the SoC group (128 [81.0%] of 158 participants versus 67 [42.9%] of 156 participants, respectively—most commonly rapidly-resolving (mild–moderate range) pain from drug administration in the BUP-XR group (121 [26.9%] of 450 adverse events). There were 11 serious adverse events (7.0%) in the 158 participants in the BUP-XR group, and 18 serious adverse events (11.5%) in the 156 participants in the SoC group—none judged to be related to study treatment. The BUP-XR treatment group had a mean incremental cost of £1033 (95% central range [CR] −1189 to 3225) and was associated with a mean incremental QALY of 0.02 (95% CR 0.00–0.05), and an ICER of £47,540 (0.37 probability of being cost-effective at the £30,000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold). However, BUP-XR dominated the SoC among participants who were rated more severe at study baseline, and among participants in maintenance treatment for more that 28 days at study enrolment. INTERPRETATION: Evaluated against the daily oral SoC, monthly BUP-XR is clinically superior, delivering greater abstinence from opioids, and with a comparable safety profile. BUP-XR was not cost-effective in a base case cost-utility analysis using the societal perspective, but it was more effective and less costly (dominant) among participants with more severe OUD, or those whose current treatment episode was longer than 28 days. Further trials are needed to evaluate if BUP-XR is associated with better clinical and health economic outcomes over the longer term. FUNDING: Indivior. Elsevier 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10692661/ /pubmed/38045803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102311 Text en Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Marsden, John Kelleher, Mike Gilvarry, Eilish Mitcheson, Luke Bisla, Jatinder Cape, Angela Cowden, Fiona Day, Edward Dewhurst, Jonathan Evans, Rachel Hardy, Will Hearn, Andrea Kelly, Joanna Lowry, Natalie McCusker, Martin Murphy, Caroline Murray, Robert Myton, Tracey Quarshie, Sophie Vanderwaal, Rob Wareham, April Hughes, Dyfrig Hoare, Zoë Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial |
title | Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial |
title_full | Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial |
title_fullStr | Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial |
title_short | Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial |
title_sort | superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marsdenjohn superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT kellehermike superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT gilvarryeilish superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT mitchesonluke superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT bislajatinder superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT capeangela superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT cowdenfiona superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT dayedward superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT dewhurstjonathan superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT evansrachel superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT hardywill superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT hearnandrea superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT kellyjoanna superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT lowrynatalie superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT mccuskermartin superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT murphycaroline superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT murrayrobert superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT mytontracey superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT quarshiesophie superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT vanderwaalrob superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT warehamapril superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT hughesdyfrig superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial AT hoarezoe superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial |