Cargando…

Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: Daily methadone maintenance or buprenorphine treatment is the standard-of-care (SoC) medication for opioid use disorder (OUD). Subcutaneously injected, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) may be more effective—but there has been no superiority evaluation. METHODS: This pragmatic, par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marsden, John, Kelleher, Mike, Gilvarry, Eilish, Mitcheson, Luke, Bisla, Jatinder, Cape, Angela, Cowden, Fiona, Day, Edward, Dewhurst, Jonathan, Evans, Rachel, Hardy, Will, Hearn, Andrea, Kelly, Joanna, Lowry, Natalie, McCusker, Martin, Murphy, Caroline, Murray, Robert, Myton, Tracey, Quarshie, Sophie, Vanderwaal, Rob, Wareham, April, Hughes, Dyfrig, Hoare, Zoë
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102311
_version_ 1785152991875039232
author Marsden, John
Kelleher, Mike
Gilvarry, Eilish
Mitcheson, Luke
Bisla, Jatinder
Cape, Angela
Cowden, Fiona
Day, Edward
Dewhurst, Jonathan
Evans, Rachel
Hardy, Will
Hearn, Andrea
Kelly, Joanna
Lowry, Natalie
McCusker, Martin
Murphy, Caroline
Murray, Robert
Myton, Tracey
Quarshie, Sophie
Vanderwaal, Rob
Wareham, April
Hughes, Dyfrig
Hoare, Zoë
author_facet Marsden, John
Kelleher, Mike
Gilvarry, Eilish
Mitcheson, Luke
Bisla, Jatinder
Cape, Angela
Cowden, Fiona
Day, Edward
Dewhurst, Jonathan
Evans, Rachel
Hardy, Will
Hearn, Andrea
Kelly, Joanna
Lowry, Natalie
McCusker, Martin
Murphy, Caroline
Murray, Robert
Myton, Tracey
Quarshie, Sophie
Vanderwaal, Rob
Wareham, April
Hughes, Dyfrig
Hoare, Zoë
author_sort Marsden, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Daily methadone maintenance or buprenorphine treatment is the standard-of-care (SoC) medication for opioid use disorder (OUD). Subcutaneously injected, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) may be more effective—but there has been no superiority evaluation. METHODS: This pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multi-centre, effectiveness superiority randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at five National Health Service community-based treatment clinics in England and Scotland. Participants (adults aged ≥ 18 years; all meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for moderate or severe OUD at admission to their current maintenance treatment episode) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive continued daily SoC (liquid methadone (usual dose range: 60–120 mg) or sublingual/transmucosal buprenorphine (usual dose range: 8–24 mg) for 24 weeks; or monthly BUP-XR (Sublocade;® two injections of 300 mg, then four maintenance injections of 100 mg or 300 mg, with maintenance dose selected by response and preference) for 24 weeks. In the intent-to-treat population (senior statistician blinded to blinded to treatment group allocation), and with a seven-day grace period after randomisation, the primary endpoint was the count of days abstinent from non-medical opioids between days 8–168 (i.e., weeks 2–24; range: 0–161 days). Safety was reported for the intention-to- treat population. Adopting a broad societal perspective inclusive of criminal justice, NHS and personal social service costs, a trial-based cost-utility analysis estimated the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of BUP-XR versus SoC at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold. The study was registered EudraCT (2018-004460-63) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05164549), and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 9, 2019 and Nov 2, 2021, 314 participants were randomly allocated to receive SoC (n = 156) or BUP-XR (n = 158). Participants were abstinent from opioids for an adjusted mean of 104.37 days (standard error [SE] 9.89; range: 0–161 days) in the SoC group and an adjusted mean of 123.43 days (SE 4.76; range: 24–161 days) in the BUP-XR group (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.33; p-value 0.004). The incidence of any adverse event was higher in the BUP-XR group than the SoC group (128 [81.0%] of 158 participants versus 67 [42.9%] of 156 participants, respectively—most commonly rapidly-resolving (mild–moderate range) pain from drug administration in the BUP-XR group (121 [26.9%] of 450 adverse events). There were 11 serious adverse events (7.0%) in the 158 participants in the BUP-XR group, and 18 serious adverse events (11.5%) in the 156 participants in the SoC group—none judged to be related to study treatment. The BUP-XR treatment group had a mean incremental cost of £1033 (95% central range [CR] −1189 to 3225) and was associated with a mean incremental QALY of 0.02 (95% CR 0.00–0.05), and an ICER of £47,540 (0.37 probability of being cost-effective at the £30,000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold). However, BUP-XR dominated the SoC among participants who were rated more severe at study baseline, and among participants in maintenance treatment for more that 28 days at study enrolment. INTERPRETATION: Evaluated against the daily oral SoC, monthly BUP-XR is clinically superior, delivering greater abstinence from opioids, and with a comparable safety profile. BUP-XR was not cost-effective in a base case cost-utility analysis using the societal perspective, but it was more effective and less costly (dominant) among participants with more severe OUD, or those whose current treatment episode was longer than 28 days. Further trials are needed to evaluate if BUP-XR is associated with better clinical and health economic outcomes over the longer term. FUNDING: Indivior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106926612023-12-03 Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial Marsden, John Kelleher, Mike Gilvarry, Eilish Mitcheson, Luke Bisla, Jatinder Cape, Angela Cowden, Fiona Day, Edward Dewhurst, Jonathan Evans, Rachel Hardy, Will Hearn, Andrea Kelly, Joanna Lowry, Natalie McCusker, Martin Murphy, Caroline Murray, Robert Myton, Tracey Quarshie, Sophie Vanderwaal, Rob Wareham, April Hughes, Dyfrig Hoare, Zoë eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Daily methadone maintenance or buprenorphine treatment is the standard-of-care (SoC) medication for opioid use disorder (OUD). Subcutaneously injected, extended-release buprenorphine (BUP-XR) may be more effective—but there has been no superiority evaluation. METHODS: This pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multi-centre, effectiveness superiority randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at five National Health Service community-based treatment clinics in England and Scotland. Participants (adults aged ≥ 18 years; all meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for moderate or severe OUD at admission to their current maintenance treatment episode) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive continued daily SoC (liquid methadone (usual dose range: 60–120 mg) or sublingual/transmucosal buprenorphine (usual dose range: 8–24 mg) for 24 weeks; or monthly BUP-XR (Sublocade;® two injections of 300 mg, then four maintenance injections of 100 mg or 300 mg, with maintenance dose selected by response and preference) for 24 weeks. In the intent-to-treat population (senior statistician blinded to blinded to treatment group allocation), and with a seven-day grace period after randomisation, the primary endpoint was the count of days abstinent from non-medical opioids between days 8–168 (i.e., weeks 2–24; range: 0–161 days). Safety was reported for the intention-to- treat population. Adopting a broad societal perspective inclusive of criminal justice, NHS and personal social service costs, a trial-based cost-utility analysis estimated the Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of BUP-XR versus SoC at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold. The study was registered EudraCT (2018-004460-63) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05164549), and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Aug 9, 2019 and Nov 2, 2021, 314 participants were randomly allocated to receive SoC (n = 156) or BUP-XR (n = 158). Participants were abstinent from opioids for an adjusted mean of 104.37 days (standard error [SE] 9.89; range: 0–161 days) in the SoC group and an adjusted mean of 123.43 days (SE 4.76; range: 24–161 days) in the BUP-XR group (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.33; p-value 0.004). The incidence of any adverse event was higher in the BUP-XR group than the SoC group (128 [81.0%] of 158 participants versus 67 [42.9%] of 156 participants, respectively—most commonly rapidly-resolving (mild–moderate range) pain from drug administration in the BUP-XR group (121 [26.9%] of 450 adverse events). There were 11 serious adverse events (7.0%) in the 158 participants in the BUP-XR group, and 18 serious adverse events (11.5%) in the 156 participants in the SoC group—none judged to be related to study treatment. The BUP-XR treatment group had a mean incremental cost of £1033 (95% central range [CR] −1189 to 3225) and was associated with a mean incremental QALY of 0.02 (95% CR 0.00–0.05), and an ICER of £47,540 (0.37 probability of being cost-effective at the £30,000/QALY gained willingness-to-pay threshold). However, BUP-XR dominated the SoC among participants who were rated more severe at study baseline, and among participants in maintenance treatment for more that 28 days at study enrolment. INTERPRETATION: Evaluated against the daily oral SoC, monthly BUP-XR is clinically superior, delivering greater abstinence from opioids, and with a comparable safety profile. BUP-XR was not cost-effective in a base case cost-utility analysis using the societal perspective, but it was more effective and less costly (dominant) among participants with more severe OUD, or those whose current treatment episode was longer than 28 days. Further trials are needed to evaluate if BUP-XR is associated with better clinical and health economic outcomes over the longer term. FUNDING: Indivior. Elsevier 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10692661/ /pubmed/38045803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102311 Text en Crown Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Marsden, John
Kelleher, Mike
Gilvarry, Eilish
Mitcheson, Luke
Bisla, Jatinder
Cape, Angela
Cowden, Fiona
Day, Edward
Dewhurst, Jonathan
Evans, Rachel
Hardy, Will
Hearn, Andrea
Kelly, Joanna
Lowry, Natalie
McCusker, Martin
Murphy, Caroline
Murray, Robert
Myton, Tracey
Quarshie, Sophie
Vanderwaal, Rob
Wareham, April
Hughes, Dyfrig
Hoare, Zoë
Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
title Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
title_full Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
title_fullStr Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
title_short Superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
title_sort superiority and cost-effectiveness of monthly extended-release buprenorphine versus daily standard of care medication: a pragmatic, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102311
work_keys_str_mv AT marsdenjohn superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT kellehermike superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT gilvarryeilish superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT mitchesonluke superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT bislajatinder superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT capeangela superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT cowdenfiona superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT dayedward superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT dewhurstjonathan superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT evansrachel superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT hardywill superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT hearnandrea superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT kellyjoanna superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT lowrynatalie superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT mccuskermartin superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT murphycaroline superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT murrayrobert superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT mytontracey superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT quarshiesophie superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT vanderwaalrob superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT warehamapril superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT hughesdyfrig superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial
AT hoarezoe superiorityandcosteffectivenessofmonthlyextendedreleasebuprenorphineversusdailystandardofcaremedicationapragmaticparallelgroupopenlabelmulticentrerandomisedcontrolledphase3trial