Cargando…

Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy is an optional strategy for the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) under an early stage, especially stage T1a. However, its efficacy in the treatment of T1b EC has not been thoroughly assessed. We investigated the efficacy of esophagectomy, endoscopic therapy, as well...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jiamin, Liang, Xiao, Chen, Shusen, Qin, Ya, Shen, Dong, Yang, Xi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22189
_version_ 1785153024233046016
author Zhu, Jiamin
Liang, Xiao
Chen, Shusen
Qin, Ya
Shen, Dong
Yang, Xi
author_facet Zhu, Jiamin
Liang, Xiao
Chen, Shusen
Qin, Ya
Shen, Dong
Yang, Xi
author_sort Zhu, Jiamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy is an optional strategy for the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) under an early stage, especially stage T1a. However, its efficacy in the treatment of T1b EC has not been thoroughly assessed. We investigated the efficacy of esophagectomy, endoscopic therapy, as well as chemoradiotherapy in patients with T1bN0M0 EC. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) was employed to identify patients diagnosed with T1bN0M0 EC. Patient demographics were compared among the endoscopic therapy, esophagectomy, and chemoradiotherapy groups. Our study employed Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model to evaluate patient outcomes and long-term survival rates. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were compared among patients with EC who underwent endoscopic therapy or esophagectomy, employing propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 820 patients diagnosed with T1bN0M0 EC were identified. The number of patients who received endoscopic therapy, esophagectomy, and chemoradiotherapy was 173, 556, and 91, respectively. Patients subjected to endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy had greatly longer OS and CSS than those who underwent chemoradiotherapy. Patients treated with esophagectomy had longer OS than endoscopic therapy patients, but there were no differences in CSS between the two groups. PSM generated 153 patient pairs among T1bN0M0 patients, demonstrating that both the esophagectomy and endoscopic therapy groups exhibited comparable OS and CSS rates. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy were associated with a significant survival advantage compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with T1bN0M0 EC. In contrast, after PSM, among the EC patients with stage T1bN0M0, OS and CSS did not differ after endoscopic therapy or esophagectomy. These results indicate that endoscopic therapy could be a viable alternative to esophagectomy in patients diagnosed with T1bN0M0 EC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106928142023-12-03 Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching Zhu, Jiamin Liang, Xiao Chen, Shusen Qin, Ya Shen, Dong Yang, Xi Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy is an optional strategy for the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) under an early stage, especially stage T1a. However, its efficacy in the treatment of T1b EC has not been thoroughly assessed. We investigated the efficacy of esophagectomy, endoscopic therapy, as well as chemoradiotherapy in patients with T1bN0M0 EC. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) was employed to identify patients diagnosed with T1bN0M0 EC. Patient demographics were compared among the endoscopic therapy, esophagectomy, and chemoradiotherapy groups. Our study employed Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model to evaluate patient outcomes and long-term survival rates. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were compared among patients with EC who underwent endoscopic therapy or esophagectomy, employing propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 820 patients diagnosed with T1bN0M0 EC were identified. The number of patients who received endoscopic therapy, esophagectomy, and chemoradiotherapy was 173, 556, and 91, respectively. Patients subjected to endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy had greatly longer OS and CSS than those who underwent chemoradiotherapy. Patients treated with esophagectomy had longer OS than endoscopic therapy patients, but there were no differences in CSS between the two groups. PSM generated 153 patient pairs among T1bN0M0 patients, demonstrating that both the esophagectomy and endoscopic therapy groups exhibited comparable OS and CSS rates. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy were associated with a significant survival advantage compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with T1bN0M0 EC. In contrast, after PSM, among the EC patients with stage T1bN0M0, OS and CSS did not differ after endoscopic therapy or esophagectomy. These results indicate that endoscopic therapy could be a viable alternative to esophagectomy in patients diagnosed with T1bN0M0 EC. Elsevier 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10692814/ /pubmed/38045191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22189 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhu, Jiamin
Liang, Xiao
Chen, Shusen
Qin, Ya
Shen, Dong
Yang, Xi
Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching
title Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching
title_full Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching
title_fullStr Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching
title_short Endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 esophageal cancer: A population-based study using propensity score matching
title_sort endoscopic therapy versus esophagectomy for t1bn0m0 esophageal cancer: a population-based study using propensity score matching
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22189
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujiamin endoscopictherapyversusesophagectomyfort1bn0m0esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudyusingpropensityscorematching
AT liangxiao endoscopictherapyversusesophagectomyfort1bn0m0esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudyusingpropensityscorematching
AT chenshusen endoscopictherapyversusesophagectomyfort1bn0m0esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudyusingpropensityscorematching
AT qinya endoscopictherapyversusesophagectomyfort1bn0m0esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudyusingpropensityscorematching
AT shendong endoscopictherapyversusesophagectomyfort1bn0m0esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudyusingpropensityscorematching
AT yangxi endoscopictherapyversusesophagectomyfort1bn0m0esophagealcancerapopulationbasedstudyusingpropensityscorematching