Cargando…
Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
BACKGROUND: Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12927 |
_version_ | 1785153035290279936 |
---|---|
author | Brahier, Mark S. Zou, Fengwei Abdulkareem, Musa Kochi, Shwetha Migliarese, Frank Thomaides, Athanasios Ma, Xiaoyang Wu, Colin Sandfort, Veit Bergquist, Peter J. Srichai, Monvadi B. Piccini, Jonathan P. Petersen, Steffen E. Vargas, Jose D. |
author_facet | Brahier, Mark S. Zou, Fengwei Abdulkareem, Musa Kochi, Shwetha Migliarese, Frank Thomaides, Athanasios Ma, Xiaoyang Wu, Colin Sandfort, Veit Bergquist, Peter J. Srichai, Monvadi B. Piccini, Jonathan P. Petersen, Steffen E. Vargas, Jose D. |
author_sort | Brahier, Mark S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and prediction of recurrent AF after ablation. METHODS: We evaluated patients with symptomatic, drug‐refractory AF undergoing catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre‐ablation cardiac computed tomography (cCT). LAVi was computed using a deep‐learning algorithm. In a two‐step analysis, random survival forest (RSF) was used to generate prognostic models with variables of highest importance, followed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the selected variables. Events of interest included early and late recurrence. RESULTS: Among 653 patients undergoing AF ablation, the most important factors associated with late recurrence by RSF analysis at 24 (+/−18) months follow‐up included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence: LAVi (HR per mL/m(2) 1.01 [1.01–1.02]; p < .001), early recurrence (HR 2.42 [1.90–3.09]; p < .001), statin use (HR 1.38 [1.09–1.75]; p = .007), beta‐blocker use (HR 1.29 [1.01–1.65]; p = .043), and adjunctive cavotricuspid isthmus ablation [HR 0.74 (0.57–0.96); p = .02]. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with both LAVi >66.7 mL/m(2) and early recurrence had the highest risk of late recurrence risk compared with those with LAVi <66.7 mL/m(2) and no early recurrence (HR 4.52 [3.36–6.08], p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning‐derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT is the most important pre‐procedural risk factor for late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four‐fold increased risk of late recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10692862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106928622023-12-03 Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation Brahier, Mark S. Zou, Fengwei Abdulkareem, Musa Kochi, Shwetha Migliarese, Frank Thomaides, Athanasios Ma, Xiaoyang Wu, Colin Sandfort, Veit Bergquist, Peter J. Srichai, Monvadi B. Piccini, Jonathan P. Petersen, Steffen E. Vargas, Jose D. J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and prediction of recurrent AF after ablation. METHODS: We evaluated patients with symptomatic, drug‐refractory AF undergoing catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre‐ablation cardiac computed tomography (cCT). LAVi was computed using a deep‐learning algorithm. In a two‐step analysis, random survival forest (RSF) was used to generate prognostic models with variables of highest importance, followed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the selected variables. Events of interest included early and late recurrence. RESULTS: Among 653 patients undergoing AF ablation, the most important factors associated with late recurrence by RSF analysis at 24 (+/−18) months follow‐up included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence: LAVi (HR per mL/m(2) 1.01 [1.01–1.02]; p < .001), early recurrence (HR 2.42 [1.90–3.09]; p < .001), statin use (HR 1.38 [1.09–1.75]; p = .007), beta‐blocker use (HR 1.29 [1.01–1.65]; p = .043), and adjunctive cavotricuspid isthmus ablation [HR 0.74 (0.57–0.96); p = .02]. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with both LAVi >66.7 mL/m(2) and early recurrence had the highest risk of late recurrence risk compared with those with LAVi <66.7 mL/m(2) and no early recurrence (HR 4.52 [3.36–6.08], p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning‐derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT is the most important pre‐procedural risk factor for late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four‐fold increased risk of late recurrence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10692862/ /pubmed/38045451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12927 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Brahier, Mark S. Zou, Fengwei Abdulkareem, Musa Kochi, Shwetha Migliarese, Frank Thomaides, Athanasios Ma, Xiaoyang Wu, Colin Sandfort, Veit Bergquist, Peter J. Srichai, Monvadi B. Piccini, Jonathan P. Petersen, Steffen E. Vargas, Jose D. Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation |
title | Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation |
title_full | Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation |
title_fullStr | Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation |
title_short | Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation |
title_sort | using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brahiermarks usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT zoufengwei usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT abdulkareemmusa usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT kochishwetha usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT migliaresefrank usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT thomaidesathanasios usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT maxiaoyang usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT wucolin usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT sandfortveit usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT bergquistpeterj usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT srichaimonvadib usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT piccinijonathanp usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT petersensteffene usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation AT vargasjosed usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation |