Cargando…

Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation

BACKGROUND: Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brahier, Mark S., Zou, Fengwei, Abdulkareem, Musa, Kochi, Shwetha, Migliarese, Frank, Thomaides, Athanasios, Ma, Xiaoyang, Wu, Colin, Sandfort, Veit, Bergquist, Peter J., Srichai, Monvadi B., Piccini, Jonathan P., Petersen, Steffen E., Vargas, Jose D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12927
_version_ 1785153035290279936
author Brahier, Mark S.
Zou, Fengwei
Abdulkareem, Musa
Kochi, Shwetha
Migliarese, Frank
Thomaides, Athanasios
Ma, Xiaoyang
Wu, Colin
Sandfort, Veit
Bergquist, Peter J.
Srichai, Monvadi B.
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Petersen, Steffen E.
Vargas, Jose D.
author_facet Brahier, Mark S.
Zou, Fengwei
Abdulkareem, Musa
Kochi, Shwetha
Migliarese, Frank
Thomaides, Athanasios
Ma, Xiaoyang
Wu, Colin
Sandfort, Veit
Bergquist, Peter J.
Srichai, Monvadi B.
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Petersen, Steffen E.
Vargas, Jose D.
author_sort Brahier, Mark S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and prediction of recurrent AF after ablation. METHODS: We evaluated patients with symptomatic, drug‐refractory AF undergoing catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre‐ablation cardiac computed tomography (cCT). LAVi was computed using a deep‐learning algorithm. In a two‐step analysis, random survival forest (RSF) was used to generate prognostic models with variables of highest importance, followed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the selected variables. Events of interest included early and late recurrence. RESULTS: Among 653 patients undergoing AF ablation, the most important factors associated with late recurrence by RSF analysis at 24 (+/−18) months follow‐up included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence: LAVi (HR per mL/m(2) 1.01 [1.01–1.02]; p < .001), early recurrence (HR 2.42 [1.90–3.09]; p < .001), statin use (HR 1.38 [1.09–1.75]; p = .007), beta‐blocker use (HR 1.29 [1.01–1.65]; p = .043), and adjunctive cavotricuspid isthmus ablation [HR 0.74 (0.57–0.96); p = .02]. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with both LAVi >66.7 mL/m(2) and early recurrence had the highest risk of late recurrence risk compared with those with LAVi <66.7 mL/m(2) and no early recurrence (HR 4.52 [3.36–6.08], p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning‐derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT is the most important pre‐procedural risk factor for late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four‐fold increased risk of late recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10692862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106928622023-12-03 Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation Brahier, Mark S. Zou, Fengwei Abdulkareem, Musa Kochi, Shwetha Migliarese, Frank Thomaides, Athanasios Ma, Xiaoyang Wu, Colin Sandfort, Veit Bergquist, Peter J. Srichai, Monvadi B. Piccini, Jonathan P. Petersen, Steffen E. Vargas, Jose D. J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Traditional risk scores for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation utilize readily available clinical and echocardiographic variables and yet have limited discriminatory capacity. Use of data from cardiac imaging and deep learning may help improve accuracy and prediction of recurrent AF after ablation. METHODS: We evaluated patients with symptomatic, drug‐refractory AF undergoing catheter ablation. All patients underwent pre‐ablation cardiac computed tomography (cCT). LAVi was computed using a deep‐learning algorithm. In a two‐step analysis, random survival forest (RSF) was used to generate prognostic models with variables of highest importance, followed by Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of the selected variables. Events of interest included early and late recurrence. RESULTS: Among 653 patients undergoing AF ablation, the most important factors associated with late recurrence by RSF analysis at 24 (+/−18) months follow‐up included LAVi and early recurrence. In total, 5 covariates were identified as independent predictors of late recurrence: LAVi (HR per mL/m(2) 1.01 [1.01–1.02]; p < .001), early recurrence (HR 2.42 [1.90–3.09]; p < .001), statin use (HR 1.38 [1.09–1.75]; p = .007), beta‐blocker use (HR 1.29 [1.01–1.65]; p = .043), and adjunctive cavotricuspid isthmus ablation [HR 0.74 (0.57–0.96); p = .02]. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with both LAVi >66.7 mL/m(2) and early recurrence had the highest risk of late recurrence risk compared with those with LAVi <66.7 mL/m(2) and no early recurrence (HR 4.52 [3.36–6.08], p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning‐derived, full volumetric LAVi from cCT is the most important pre‐procedural risk factor for late AF recurrence following catheter ablation. The combination of increased LAVi and early recurrence confers more than a four‐fold increased risk of late recurrence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10692862/ /pubmed/38045451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12927 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Brahier, Mark S.
Zou, Fengwei
Abdulkareem, Musa
Kochi, Shwetha
Migliarese, Frank
Thomaides, Athanasios
Ma, Xiaoyang
Wu, Colin
Sandfort, Veit
Bergquist, Peter J.
Srichai, Monvadi B.
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Petersen, Steffen E.
Vargas, Jose D.
Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
title Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
title_full Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
title_fullStr Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
title_full_unstemmed Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
title_short Using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
title_sort using machine learning to enhance prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38045451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12927
work_keys_str_mv AT brahiermarks usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT zoufengwei usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT abdulkareemmusa usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT kochishwetha usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT migliaresefrank usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT thomaidesathanasios usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT maxiaoyang usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT wucolin usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT sandfortveit usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT bergquistpeterj usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT srichaimonvadib usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT piccinijonathanp usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT petersensteffene usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation
AT vargasjosed usingmachinelearningtoenhancepredictionofatrialfibrillationrecurrenceaftercatheterablation