Cargando…
Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey
BACKGROUND: The findings from multi-centre trials are central to the practice of evidence-based medicine, enabling the development and implementation of new treatments. The time it takes to commence clinical trials at sites can be long, and ethics and governance approvals are key steps on the pathwa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38041126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07802-2 |
_version_ | 1785153066750705664 |
---|---|
author | Crosby, Sam Malavisi, Adriana Huang, Liping Jan, Stephen Holden, Richard Neal, Bruce |
author_facet | Crosby, Sam Malavisi, Adriana Huang, Liping Jan, Stephen Holden, Richard Neal, Bruce |
author_sort | Crosby, Sam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The findings from multi-centre trials are central to the practice of evidence-based medicine, enabling the development and implementation of new treatments. The time it takes to commence clinical trials at sites can be long, and ethics and governance approvals are key steps on the pathway to site activation. The goal of this study was to explore factors influencing the times to ethics approval, governance approval and site activation for multi-centre clinical trials. METHODS: This paper assessed the associations of trial characteristics (disease area and trial phase), site characteristics (government or private ownership, country) and characteristics of the ethics and governance processes (scope guidelines, mutual acceptance requirements and triage of projects by risk) with times to approvals and activation. Median times were compared between site initiations that were and were not exposed to each characteristic using non-parametric tests in univariable and multivariable regressions. RESULTS: There were data from 150 site activations done across 91 sites, 16 trials and 5 countries from November 2013 to November 2021. The overall median time to activation was 234 days (range 74 to 657), with ethics approval taking a median of 48 days (0 to 369) and governance approval a median of 34 days (0 to 489). Both the univariable and multivariable analyses identified associations of disease area, particularly oncology (p univariable = 0.012, p multivariable = 0.044), use of scope guidelines (p < 0.001, p = 0.020) and use of a triage process (p < 0.001, 0.043) with shorter median times for governance approval. These characteristics (all p < 0.001) plus early trial phase (p = 0.028) were also predictive of shorter median times for ethics approval in univariable analyses, but none remained predictive in multivariable models (all p > 0.054). The only factors associated with reduced overall time to site activation in both univariable and multivariable analyses were the early trial phase (p < 0.001, p = 0.013) and mutual acceptance of ethics approvals (p = 0.031, p = 0.030). INTERPRETATION: Times to ethics and governance approvals were only one third of total trial start-up time. Factors influencing times to approval and activation were somewhat inconsistent across analyses, but it seems likely that the introduction of selected governance and ethics processes can reduce approval times. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07802-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10693024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106930242023-12-03 Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey Crosby, Sam Malavisi, Adriana Huang, Liping Jan, Stephen Holden, Richard Neal, Bruce Trials Research BACKGROUND: The findings from multi-centre trials are central to the practice of evidence-based medicine, enabling the development and implementation of new treatments. The time it takes to commence clinical trials at sites can be long, and ethics and governance approvals are key steps on the pathway to site activation. The goal of this study was to explore factors influencing the times to ethics approval, governance approval and site activation for multi-centre clinical trials. METHODS: This paper assessed the associations of trial characteristics (disease area and trial phase), site characteristics (government or private ownership, country) and characteristics of the ethics and governance processes (scope guidelines, mutual acceptance requirements and triage of projects by risk) with times to approvals and activation. Median times were compared between site initiations that were and were not exposed to each characteristic using non-parametric tests in univariable and multivariable regressions. RESULTS: There were data from 150 site activations done across 91 sites, 16 trials and 5 countries from November 2013 to November 2021. The overall median time to activation was 234 days (range 74 to 657), with ethics approval taking a median of 48 days (0 to 369) and governance approval a median of 34 days (0 to 489). Both the univariable and multivariable analyses identified associations of disease area, particularly oncology (p univariable = 0.012, p multivariable = 0.044), use of scope guidelines (p < 0.001, p = 0.020) and use of a triage process (p < 0.001, 0.043) with shorter median times for governance approval. These characteristics (all p < 0.001) plus early trial phase (p = 0.028) were also predictive of shorter median times for ethics approval in univariable analyses, but none remained predictive in multivariable models (all p > 0.054). The only factors associated with reduced overall time to site activation in both univariable and multivariable analyses were the early trial phase (p < 0.001, p = 0.013) and mutual acceptance of ethics approvals (p = 0.031, p = 0.030). INTERPRETATION: Times to ethics and governance approvals were only one third of total trial start-up time. Factors influencing times to approval and activation were somewhat inconsistent across analyses, but it seems likely that the introduction of selected governance and ethics processes can reduce approval times. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07802-2. BioMed Central 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10693024/ /pubmed/38041126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07802-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Crosby, Sam Malavisi, Adriana Huang, Liping Jan, Stephen Holden, Richard Neal, Bruce Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey |
title | Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey |
title_full | Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey |
title_short | Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38041126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07802-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crosbysam factorsinfluencingthetimetoethicsandgovernanceapprovalsforclinicaltrialsaretrospectivecrosssectionalsurvey AT malavisiadriana factorsinfluencingthetimetoethicsandgovernanceapprovalsforclinicaltrialsaretrospectivecrosssectionalsurvey AT huangliping factorsinfluencingthetimetoethicsandgovernanceapprovalsforclinicaltrialsaretrospectivecrosssectionalsurvey AT janstephen factorsinfluencingthetimetoethicsandgovernanceapprovalsforclinicaltrialsaretrospectivecrosssectionalsurvey AT holdenrichard factorsinfluencingthetimetoethicsandgovernanceapprovalsforclinicaltrialsaretrospectivecrosssectionalsurvey AT nealbruce factorsinfluencingthetimetoethicsandgovernanceapprovalsforclinicaltrialsaretrospectivecrosssectionalsurvey |