Cargando…
The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Back pain during pregnancy is often considered as an unavoidable problem and can reduce the quality of life or disability of pregnant women. The aim of this study is to determine the global prevalence of back pain in pregnancy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06151-x |
_version_ | 1785153082776092672 |
---|---|
author | Salari, Nader Mohammadi, Aida Hemmati, Mahvan Hasheminezhad, Razie Kani, Salim Shohaimi, Shamarina Mohammadi, Masoud |
author_facet | Salari, Nader Mohammadi, Aida Hemmati, Mahvan Hasheminezhad, Razie Kani, Salim Shohaimi, Shamarina Mohammadi, Masoud |
author_sort | Salari, Nader |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Back pain during pregnancy is often considered as an unavoidable problem and can reduce the quality of life or disability of pregnant women. The aim of this study is to determine the global prevalence of back pain in pregnancy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In this study, Researchers systematically searched electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar search engines for studies until September 2023. To analyze data, the random effects model was used, and the heterogeneity of the studies was checked with the I2 index. Data analysis was performed by software (Version 2 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis). RESULTS: In the review of 28 studies with a sample size of 12,908 people, the I(2) heterogeneity test showed high heterogeneity (I(2): 98.4). Based on this, the random effects method was used to analyze the results. Therefore, the meta-analysis reported the global prevalence of back pain at 40.5 (95% CI: 33–48.4) during pregnancy. Also, according to the meta-analysis, the global prevalence of back pain in the first trimester of pregnancy is 28.3 (95%CI: 10.5–57.1), in the second trimester is 36.8 (95%CI: 30.4–43.7) and in the third trimester of pregnancy was reported as 47.8 (95% CI: 37.2–58.6). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, the overall prevalence of back pain in pregnant women was reported to be significant, so it is necessary for health policymakers to pay more attention to complications during pregnancy, in addition to increasing society's awareness of pregnant mothers, with timely diagnosis and treatment of such disorders, it can lead to improvement; and reduction in Complications caused by pregnancy and becoming more pleasant during pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10693090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106930902023-12-03 The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis Salari, Nader Mohammadi, Aida Hemmati, Mahvan Hasheminezhad, Razie Kani, Salim Shohaimi, Shamarina Mohammadi, Masoud BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Back pain during pregnancy is often considered as an unavoidable problem and can reduce the quality of life or disability of pregnant women. The aim of this study is to determine the global prevalence of back pain in pregnancy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In this study, Researchers systematically searched electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar search engines for studies until September 2023. To analyze data, the random effects model was used, and the heterogeneity of the studies was checked with the I2 index. Data analysis was performed by software (Version 2 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis). RESULTS: In the review of 28 studies with a sample size of 12,908 people, the I(2) heterogeneity test showed high heterogeneity (I(2): 98.4). Based on this, the random effects method was used to analyze the results. Therefore, the meta-analysis reported the global prevalence of back pain at 40.5 (95% CI: 33–48.4) during pregnancy. Also, according to the meta-analysis, the global prevalence of back pain in the first trimester of pregnancy is 28.3 (95%CI: 10.5–57.1), in the second trimester is 36.8 (95%CI: 30.4–43.7) and in the third trimester of pregnancy was reported as 47.8 (95% CI: 37.2–58.6). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, the overall prevalence of back pain in pregnant women was reported to be significant, so it is necessary for health policymakers to pay more attention to complications during pregnancy, in addition to increasing society's awareness of pregnant mothers, with timely diagnosis and treatment of such disorders, it can lead to improvement; and reduction in Complications caused by pregnancy and becoming more pleasant during pregnancy. BioMed Central 2023-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10693090/ /pubmed/38042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06151-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Salari, Nader Mohammadi, Aida Hemmati, Mahvan Hasheminezhad, Razie Kani, Salim Shohaimi, Shamarina Mohammadi, Masoud The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06151-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salarinader theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohammadiaida theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hemmatimahvan theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hasheminezhadrazie theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kanisalim theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shohaimishamarina theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohammadimasoud theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salarinader globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohammadiaida globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hemmatimahvan globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hasheminezhadrazie globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kanisalim globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shohaimishamarina globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohammadimasoud globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |