Cargando…

The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Back pain during pregnancy is often considered as an unavoidable problem and can reduce the quality of life or disability of pregnant women. The aim of this study is to determine the global prevalence of back pain in pregnancy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salari, Nader, Mohammadi, Aida, Hemmati, Mahvan, Hasheminezhad, Razie, Kani, Salim, Shohaimi, Shamarina, Mohammadi, Masoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06151-x
_version_ 1785153082776092672
author Salari, Nader
Mohammadi, Aida
Hemmati, Mahvan
Hasheminezhad, Razie
Kani, Salim
Shohaimi, Shamarina
Mohammadi, Masoud
author_facet Salari, Nader
Mohammadi, Aida
Hemmati, Mahvan
Hasheminezhad, Razie
Kani, Salim
Shohaimi, Shamarina
Mohammadi, Masoud
author_sort Salari, Nader
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Back pain during pregnancy is often considered as an unavoidable problem and can reduce the quality of life or disability of pregnant women. The aim of this study is to determine the global prevalence of back pain in pregnancy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In this study, Researchers systematically searched electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar search engines for studies until September 2023. To analyze data, the random effects model was used, and the heterogeneity of the studies was checked with the I2 index. Data analysis was performed by software (Version 2 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis). RESULTS: In the review of 28 studies with a sample size of 12,908 people, the I(2) heterogeneity test showed high heterogeneity (I(2): 98.4). Based on this, the random effects method was used to analyze the results. Therefore, the meta-analysis reported the global prevalence of back pain at 40.5 (95% CI: 33–48.4) during pregnancy. Also, according to the meta-analysis, the global prevalence of back pain in the first trimester of pregnancy is 28.3 (95%CI: 10.5–57.1), in the second trimester is 36.8 (95%CI: 30.4–43.7) and in the third trimester of pregnancy was reported as 47.8 (95% CI: 37.2–58.6). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, the overall prevalence of back pain in pregnant women was reported to be significant, so it is necessary for health policymakers to pay more attention to complications during pregnancy, in addition to increasing society's awareness of pregnant mothers, with timely diagnosis and treatment of such disorders, it can lead to improvement; and reduction in Complications caused by pregnancy and becoming more pleasant during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106930902023-12-03 The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis Salari, Nader Mohammadi, Aida Hemmati, Mahvan Hasheminezhad, Razie Kani, Salim Shohaimi, Shamarina Mohammadi, Masoud BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Back pain during pregnancy is often considered as an unavoidable problem and can reduce the quality of life or disability of pregnant women. The aim of this study is to determine the global prevalence of back pain in pregnancy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: In this study, Researchers systematically searched electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar search engines for studies until September 2023. To analyze data, the random effects model was used, and the heterogeneity of the studies was checked with the I2 index. Data analysis was performed by software (Version 2 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis). RESULTS: In the review of 28 studies with a sample size of 12,908 people, the I(2) heterogeneity test showed high heterogeneity (I(2): 98.4). Based on this, the random effects method was used to analyze the results. Therefore, the meta-analysis reported the global prevalence of back pain at 40.5 (95% CI: 33–48.4) during pregnancy. Also, according to the meta-analysis, the global prevalence of back pain in the first trimester of pregnancy is 28.3 (95%CI: 10.5–57.1), in the second trimester is 36.8 (95%CI: 30.4–43.7) and in the third trimester of pregnancy was reported as 47.8 (95% CI: 37.2–58.6). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, the overall prevalence of back pain in pregnant women was reported to be significant, so it is necessary for health policymakers to pay more attention to complications during pregnancy, in addition to increasing society's awareness of pregnant mothers, with timely diagnosis and treatment of such disorders, it can lead to improvement; and reduction in Complications caused by pregnancy and becoming more pleasant during pregnancy. BioMed Central 2023-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10693090/ /pubmed/38042815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06151-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Salari, Nader
Mohammadi, Aida
Hemmati, Mahvan
Hasheminezhad, Razie
Kani, Salim
Shohaimi, Shamarina
Mohammadi, Masoud
The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
title The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort global prevalence of low back pain in pregnancy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06151-x
work_keys_str_mv AT salarinader theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammadiaida theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hemmatimahvan theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hasheminezhadrazie theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kanisalim theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shohaimishamarina theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammadimasoud theglobalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT salarinader globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammadiaida globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hemmatimahvan globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hasheminezhadrazie globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kanisalim globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shohaimishamarina globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mohammadimasoud globalprevalenceoflowbackpaininpregnancyacomprehensivesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis