Cargando…
A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discussing treatment wishes and limitations during medical consultations aims to enable patients to define goals and preferences for future care. Patients and physicians, however, face multiple barriers, resulting in postponing or avoiding the conversation. The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38041103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10342-9 |
_version_ | 1785153095841349632 |
---|---|
author | Briedé, S. Brandwijk, O. N. van Charldorp, T. C. Kaasjager, H. A. H. |
author_facet | Briedé, S. Brandwijk, O. N. van Charldorp, T. C. Kaasjager, H. A. H. |
author_sort | Briedé, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discussing treatment wishes and limitations during medical consultations aims to enable patients to define goals and preferences for future care. Patients and physicians, however, face multiple barriers, resulting in postponing or avoiding the conversation. The aim of this study was to explore an internal medicine outpatient clinic population’s perception on (discussing) treatment wishes and limitations. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in two rounds with 44 internal medicine outpatient clinic patients at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, a tertiary care teaching medical centre in the Netherlands. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed with a phenomenological approach and inductive, data-driven coding. RESULTS: Four themes were identified, two (1–2) represent a deep conviction, two (3–4) are practically oriented: (1) patients associate treatment wishes and limitations with the end-of-life, making it sensitive and currently irrelevant, (2) patients assume this process leads to fixed choices, whilst their wishes might be situation dependent, (3) treatment wishes and limitations are about balancing whether a treatment ‘is worth it’, in which several subthemes carry weight, (4) the physician is assigned a key role. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The themes provide starting points for future interventions. It should be emphasized that care decisions are a continuous, dynamic process, relevant at any time in any circumstance and the physician should be aware of his/her key role. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10342-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10693144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106931442023-12-03 A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study Briedé, S. Brandwijk, O. N. van Charldorp, T. C. Kaasjager, H. A. H. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discussing treatment wishes and limitations during medical consultations aims to enable patients to define goals and preferences for future care. Patients and physicians, however, face multiple barriers, resulting in postponing or avoiding the conversation. The aim of this study was to explore an internal medicine outpatient clinic population’s perception on (discussing) treatment wishes and limitations. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in two rounds with 44 internal medicine outpatient clinic patients at the University Medical Centre Utrecht, a tertiary care teaching medical centre in the Netherlands. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed with a phenomenological approach and inductive, data-driven coding. RESULTS: Four themes were identified, two (1–2) represent a deep conviction, two (3–4) are practically oriented: (1) patients associate treatment wishes and limitations with the end-of-life, making it sensitive and currently irrelevant, (2) patients assume this process leads to fixed choices, whilst their wishes might be situation dependent, (3) treatment wishes and limitations are about balancing whether a treatment ‘is worth it’, in which several subthemes carry weight, (4) the physician is assigned a key role. CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The themes provide starting points for future interventions. It should be emphasized that care decisions are a continuous, dynamic process, relevant at any time in any circumstance and the physician should be aware of his/her key role. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10342-9. BioMed Central 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10693144/ /pubmed/38041103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10342-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Briedé, S. Brandwijk, O. N. van Charldorp, T. C. Kaasjager, H. A. H. A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study |
title | A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study |
title_full | A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr | A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study |
title_short | A patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study |
title_sort | patient’s perspective on care decisions: a qualitative interview study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38041103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10342-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT briedes apatientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT brandwijkon apatientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT vancharldorptc apatientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT kaasjagerhah apatientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT briedes patientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT brandwijkon patientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT vancharldorptc patientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT kaasjagerhah patientsperspectiveoncaredecisionsaqualitativeinterviewstudy |