Cargando…
Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology
The use of robot-assisted technology has been widely adopted in urological oncological surgery and its benefits have been well established. In recent years, robotic technology has also been used in several functional reconstructive and neuro-urology (FRNU) procedures. The aim of this review was to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231213727 |
_version_ | 1785153111811162112 |
---|---|
author | Tsoi, Hermione Elnasharty, Sameh F. Culha, Mehmet Gokhan De Cillis, Sabrina Guillot-Tantay, Cyrille Hervé, François Hüesch, Tanja Raison, Nicholas Phé, Véronique Osman, Nadir I. |
author_facet | Tsoi, Hermione Elnasharty, Sameh F. Culha, Mehmet Gokhan De Cillis, Sabrina Guillot-Tantay, Cyrille Hervé, François Hüesch, Tanja Raison, Nicholas Phé, Véronique Osman, Nadir I. |
author_sort | Tsoi, Hermione |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of robot-assisted technology has been widely adopted in urological oncological surgery and its benefits have been well established. In recent years, robotic technology has also been used in several functional reconstructive and neuro-urology (FRNU) procedures. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current evidence in the use of robotic technology in the field of FRNU. We performed a PubMed-based literature search between July and August 2022. The keywords we included were ‘robotic assisted’, ‘ureteric reimplantation’, ‘cystoplasty’, ‘ileal conduit’, ‘neobladder’, ‘sacrocolpopexy’, ‘colposuspension’, ‘artificial urinary sphincter’, ‘genitourinary fistula’ and ‘posterior urethral stenoses’. We identified the latest available evidence in the use of robotic technology in specific FRNU procedures such as the reconstruction of the ureters, bladder and urinary sphincter, urinary diversion, and repair of genitourinary prolapse and fistula. We found that there is a lack of prospective studies to assess the robotic-assisted approach in the field of FRNU. Despite this, the advantages that robotic technology can bring to the field of FRNU are evident, including better ergonomics and visual field, less blood loss and shorter hospital stays. There is therefore a need for further prospective studies with larger patient numbers and longer follow-up periods to establish the reproducibility of these results and the long-term efficacy of the procedures, as well as the impact on patient outcomes. Common index procedures and a standardized approach to these procedures should be identified to enhance training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10693211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106932112023-12-03 Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology Tsoi, Hermione Elnasharty, Sameh F. Culha, Mehmet Gokhan De Cillis, Sabrina Guillot-Tantay, Cyrille Hervé, François Hüesch, Tanja Raison, Nicholas Phé, Véronique Osman, Nadir I. Ther Adv Urol Review The use of robot-assisted technology has been widely adopted in urological oncological surgery and its benefits have been well established. In recent years, robotic technology has also been used in several functional reconstructive and neuro-urology (FRNU) procedures. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current evidence in the use of robotic technology in the field of FRNU. We performed a PubMed-based literature search between July and August 2022. The keywords we included were ‘robotic assisted’, ‘ureteric reimplantation’, ‘cystoplasty’, ‘ileal conduit’, ‘neobladder’, ‘sacrocolpopexy’, ‘colposuspension’, ‘artificial urinary sphincter’, ‘genitourinary fistula’ and ‘posterior urethral stenoses’. We identified the latest available evidence in the use of robotic technology in specific FRNU procedures such as the reconstruction of the ureters, bladder and urinary sphincter, urinary diversion, and repair of genitourinary prolapse and fistula. We found that there is a lack of prospective studies to assess the robotic-assisted approach in the field of FRNU. Despite this, the advantages that robotic technology can bring to the field of FRNU are evident, including better ergonomics and visual field, less blood loss and shorter hospital stays. There is therefore a need for further prospective studies with larger patient numbers and longer follow-up periods to establish the reproducibility of these results and the long-term efficacy of the procedures, as well as the impact on patient outcomes. Common index procedures and a standardized approach to these procedures should be identified to enhance training. SAGE Publications 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10693211/ /pubmed/38046941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231213727 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Tsoi, Hermione Elnasharty, Sameh F. Culha, Mehmet Gokhan De Cillis, Sabrina Guillot-Tantay, Cyrille Hervé, François Hüesch, Tanja Raison, Nicholas Phé, Véronique Osman, Nadir I. Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
title | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
title_full | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
title_fullStr | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
title_full_unstemmed | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
title_short | Current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
title_sort | current evidence of robotic-assisted surgery use in functional reconstructive and neuro-urology |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38046941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231213727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsoihermione currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT elnashartysamehf currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT culhamehmetgokhan currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT decillissabrina currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT guillottantaycyrille currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT hervefrancois currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT hueschtanja currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT raisonnicholas currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT pheveronique currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology AT osmannadiri currentevidenceofroboticassistedsurgeryuseinfunctionalreconstructiveandneurourology |