Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-containing dressings are recommended to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and other catheter-related infections. This study compared the effect of 2 CHG dressings on CLABSI, cost of care, and contact dermatitis. A retrospective analysis wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Yuefeng, Griffin, Leah, Bernatchez, Stéphanie F., Hommes, Joseph, Kärpänen, Tarja, Palka-Santini, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580231214751
_version_ 1785153115353251840
author Hou, Yuefeng
Griffin, Leah
Bernatchez, Stéphanie F.
Hommes, Joseph
Kärpänen, Tarja
Palka-Santini, Maria
author_facet Hou, Yuefeng
Griffin, Leah
Bernatchez, Stéphanie F.
Hommes, Joseph
Kärpänen, Tarja
Palka-Santini, Maria
author_sort Hou, Yuefeng
collection PubMed
description Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-containing dressings are recommended to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and other catheter-related infections. This study compared the effect of 2 CHG dressings on CLABSI, cost of care, and contact dermatitis. A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database of hospitalized patients (n = 53 149) with central venous catheters (CVCs) and receiving either a transparent CHG gel dressing (n = 14 488) or an opaque CHG sponge dressing (n = 38 661) between January 2019 and September 2020. Two cohorts (n = 14 488 each), CHG-Gel and CHG-Sponge, were matched 1:1 using a propensity score method on 33 patient and facility characteristics. CLABSI and contact dermatitis rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs were compared using mixed-effect multiple regression. This approach effectively controlled for random clustering effects across hospitals and patients’ Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) classifications. CHG gel dressings were associated with a 41% decrease in CLABSI rates (P = .0008) compared to CHG sponge dressings (0.35%vs 0.60%). A 0.4-day shorter LOS (9.53vs 9.90 days, P = .0001) and a cost saving of $3576 per hospital stay ($40 197 vs $43 774, P = .0179) was observed with CHG gel dressing use. There was no statistically significant difference in contact dermatitis rates (P = .7854) between the CHG-Gel and CHG-Sponge cohorts. The findings of this study suggest that the use of CHG gel dressings may be more effective in reducing the risk of CLABSIs and associated clinical costs compared to CHG sponge dressings in hospitalized patients. Moreover, there appears to be no significant discrepancy in contact dermatitis rates between CHG gel and CHG sponge dressings. Healthcare providers may consider using CHG gel dressings as a standard practice for patients with CVCs to reduce the risk of infections and improve patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106932262023-12-03 Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs Hou, Yuefeng Griffin, Leah Bernatchez, Stéphanie F. Hommes, Joseph Kärpänen, Tarja Palka-Santini, Maria Inquiry Original Research Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-containing dressings are recommended to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and other catheter-related infections. This study compared the effect of 2 CHG dressings on CLABSI, cost of care, and contact dermatitis. A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database of hospitalized patients (n = 53 149) with central venous catheters (CVCs) and receiving either a transparent CHG gel dressing (n = 14 488) or an opaque CHG sponge dressing (n = 38 661) between January 2019 and September 2020. Two cohorts (n = 14 488 each), CHG-Gel and CHG-Sponge, were matched 1:1 using a propensity score method on 33 patient and facility characteristics. CLABSI and contact dermatitis rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs were compared using mixed-effect multiple regression. This approach effectively controlled for random clustering effects across hospitals and patients’ Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) classifications. CHG gel dressings were associated with a 41% decrease in CLABSI rates (P = .0008) compared to CHG sponge dressings (0.35%vs 0.60%). A 0.4-day shorter LOS (9.53vs 9.90 days, P = .0001) and a cost saving of $3576 per hospital stay ($40 197 vs $43 774, P = .0179) was observed with CHG gel dressing use. There was no statistically significant difference in contact dermatitis rates (P = .7854) between the CHG-Gel and CHG-Sponge cohorts. The findings of this study suggest that the use of CHG gel dressings may be more effective in reducing the risk of CLABSIs and associated clinical costs compared to CHG sponge dressings in hospitalized patients. Moreover, there appears to be no significant discrepancy in contact dermatitis rates between CHG gel and CHG sponge dressings. Healthcare providers may consider using CHG gel dressings as a standard practice for patients with CVCs to reduce the risk of infections and improve patient outcomes. SAGE Publications 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10693226/ /pubmed/38037829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580231214751 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Hou, Yuefeng
Griffin, Leah
Bernatchez, Stéphanie F.
Hommes, Joseph
Kärpänen, Tarja
Palka-Santini, Maria
Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs
title Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs
title_sort comparative effectiveness of 2 chlorhexidine gluconate-containing dressings in reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections, hospital stay, and costs
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580231214751
work_keys_str_mv AT houyuefeng comparativeeffectivenessof2chlorhexidinegluconatecontainingdressingsinreducingcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionshospitalstayandcosts
AT griffinleah comparativeeffectivenessof2chlorhexidinegluconatecontainingdressingsinreducingcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionshospitalstayandcosts
AT bernatchezstephanief comparativeeffectivenessof2chlorhexidinegluconatecontainingdressingsinreducingcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionshospitalstayandcosts
AT hommesjoseph comparativeeffectivenessof2chlorhexidinegluconatecontainingdressingsinreducingcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionshospitalstayandcosts
AT karpanentarja comparativeeffectivenessof2chlorhexidinegluconatecontainingdressingsinreducingcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionshospitalstayandcosts
AT palkasantinimaria comparativeeffectivenessof2chlorhexidinegluconatecontainingdressingsinreducingcentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfectionshospitalstayandcosts