Cargando…
Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review
BACKGROUND: The exploration and monitoring of the personal values, wishes, and needs (VWN) of patients in the palliative phase by hospital clinicians is essential for guiding appropriate palliative care. OBJECTIVE: To explore the barriers and facilitators concerning communication with patients in th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38044932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231212510 |
_version_ | 1785153115609104384 |
---|---|
author | de Vries, Sita Verhoef, Mary-Joanne Vervoort, Sigrid Cornelia Johanna Maria van der Linden, Yvette Milene Teunissen, Saskia Cornelia Constantia Maria de Graaf, Everlien |
author_facet | de Vries, Sita Verhoef, Mary-Joanne Vervoort, Sigrid Cornelia Johanna Maria van der Linden, Yvette Milene Teunissen, Saskia Cornelia Constantia Maria de Graaf, Everlien |
author_sort | de Vries, Sita |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The exploration and monitoring of the personal values, wishes, and needs (VWN) of patients in the palliative phase by hospital clinicians is essential for guiding appropriate palliative care. OBJECTIVE: To explore the barriers and facilitators concerning communication with patients in the palliative phase about their VWN as perceived by hospital clinicians. DESIGN: A mixed-methods systematic review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for mixed-method systematic reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021216693). DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: Eight databases, including PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL, were searched without time restrictions. The search string was built using the search Palliative cAre Literature rEview iTeraTive mEthod (PALETTE) framework. Eligible studies focused on (1) hospital clinicians and (2) perceived barriers and facilitators regarding the exploration and monitoring of the VWN of adult patients in the palliative phase. Two researchers independently selected articles and evaluated the quality. Findings were synthesized using a convergent integrated approach. RESULTS: In total, 29 studies were included: 14 quantitative, 13 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods. Five synthesized findings were identified: (1) the clinician’s professional manners, (2) the image formed of the patient and loved ones, (3) the human aspect of being a clinician, (4) the multidisciplinary collaboration, and (5) the contextual preconditions. Most studies seemed focused on communication about treatment decision making. CONCLUSION: A patient-centered approach seems lacking when clinicians discuss the patient’s VWN, since most studies focused on treatment decision making rather than on the exploration and monitoring of the multidimensional well-being of patients. This review emphasizes the need for the development and integration of a systematic approach to explore and monitor the patients’ VWN to improve appropriate palliative care in hospitals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10693227 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106932272023-12-03 Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review de Vries, Sita Verhoef, Mary-Joanne Vervoort, Sigrid Cornelia Johanna Maria van der Linden, Yvette Milene Teunissen, Saskia Cornelia Constantia Maria de Graaf, Everlien Palliat Care Soc Pract Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The exploration and monitoring of the personal values, wishes, and needs (VWN) of patients in the palliative phase by hospital clinicians is essential for guiding appropriate palliative care. OBJECTIVE: To explore the barriers and facilitators concerning communication with patients in the palliative phase about their VWN as perceived by hospital clinicians. DESIGN: A mixed-methods systematic review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for mixed-method systematic reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021216693). DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: Eight databases, including PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL, were searched without time restrictions. The search string was built using the search Palliative cAre Literature rEview iTeraTive mEthod (PALETTE) framework. Eligible studies focused on (1) hospital clinicians and (2) perceived barriers and facilitators regarding the exploration and monitoring of the VWN of adult patients in the palliative phase. Two researchers independently selected articles and evaluated the quality. Findings were synthesized using a convergent integrated approach. RESULTS: In total, 29 studies were included: 14 quantitative, 13 qualitative, and 2 mixed methods. Five synthesized findings were identified: (1) the clinician’s professional manners, (2) the image formed of the patient and loved ones, (3) the human aspect of being a clinician, (4) the multidisciplinary collaboration, and (5) the contextual preconditions. Most studies seemed focused on communication about treatment decision making. CONCLUSION: A patient-centered approach seems lacking when clinicians discuss the patient’s VWN, since most studies focused on treatment decision making rather than on the exploration and monitoring of the multidimensional well-being of patients. This review emphasizes the need for the development and integration of a systematic approach to explore and monitor the patients’ VWN to improve appropriate palliative care in hospitals. SAGE Publications 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10693227/ /pubmed/38044932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231212510 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review de Vries, Sita Verhoef, Mary-Joanne Vervoort, Sigrid Cornelia Johanna Maria van der Linden, Yvette Milene Teunissen, Saskia Cornelia Constantia Maria de Graaf, Everlien Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review |
title | Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_full | Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_fullStr | Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_short | Barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review |
title_sort | barriers and facilitators that hospital clinicians perceive to discuss the personal values, wishes, and needs of patients in palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38044932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231212510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devriessita barriersandfacilitatorsthathospitalcliniciansperceivetodiscussthepersonalvalueswishesandneedsofpatientsinpalliativecareamixedmethodssystematicreview AT verhoefmaryjoanne barriersandfacilitatorsthathospitalcliniciansperceivetodiscussthepersonalvalueswishesandneedsofpatientsinpalliativecareamixedmethodssystematicreview AT vervoortsigridcorneliajohannamaria barriersandfacilitatorsthathospitalcliniciansperceivetodiscussthepersonalvalueswishesandneedsofpatientsinpalliativecareamixedmethodssystematicreview AT vanderlindenyvettemilene barriersandfacilitatorsthathospitalcliniciansperceivetodiscussthepersonalvalueswishesandneedsofpatientsinpalliativecareamixedmethodssystematicreview AT teunissensaskiacorneliaconstantiamaria barriersandfacilitatorsthathospitalcliniciansperceivetodiscussthepersonalvalueswishesandneedsofpatientsinpalliativecareamixedmethodssystematicreview AT degraafeverlien barriersandfacilitatorsthathospitalcliniciansperceivetodiscussthepersonalvalueswishesandneedsofpatientsinpalliativecareamixedmethodssystematicreview |