Cargando…

Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cummerow, Julia, Obst, Katrin, Voltmer, Edgar, Kötter, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IJME 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36870063
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.63de.3840
_version_ 1785153153316945920
author Cummerow, Julia
Obst, Katrin
Voltmer, Edgar
Kötter, Thomas
author_facet Cummerow, Julia
Obst, Katrin
Voltmer, Edgar
Kötter, Thomas
author_sort Cummerow, Julia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping. RESULTS: Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F ((2, 494)) = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F ((2, 494)) = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t ((213)) = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t ((213)) = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t ((213)) = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping. CONCLUSIONS: Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher IJME
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106934022023-12-03 Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study Cummerow, Julia Obst, Katrin Voltmer, Edgar Kötter, Thomas Int J Med Educ Original Research OBJECTIVES: To analyse stress coping styles of medical students at different time points of medical education and to identify predictors of functional coping. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students (N = 497, 361 women and 136 men) before year one (n = 141), after year one (n = 135) and after year five (n = 220). Students answered the Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory, the Work-Related Behaviour and Experience Patterns, the Perceived Medical School Stress Instrument and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multiple regression was used to examine factors associated with functional coping. RESULTS: Single factor ANOVA indicated a significant difference for functional coping between the time points (F ((2, 494)) = 9.52, p < .01), with fifth-year students scoring significantly higher than students before or after year one. There was a significant difference in dysfunctional coping (F ((2, 494)) = 12.37, p < .01), with students before year one and after year five scoring higher than those after year one. Efficacy (β = 0.15, t ((213)) = 4.66, p < .01), emotional distancing (β = 0.04, t ((213)) = 3.50, p < .01) and satisfaction with life (β = 0.06, t ((213)) = 4.87, p < .01) were positive predictors of functional coping. CONCLUSIONS: Scores for both functional and dysfunctional coping vary during medical education. The reasons for low coping scores after year one require further explanation. These findings represent a starting point for investigations into how to promote functional coping during early medical education. IJME 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10693402/ /pubmed/36870063 http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.63de.3840 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Julia Cummerow et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use of work provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
spellingShingle Original Research
Cummerow, Julia
Obst, Katrin
Voltmer, Edgar
Kötter, Thomas
Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study
title Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study
title_full Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study
title_short Medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study
title_sort medical students’ coping with stress and its predictors: a cross-sectional study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36870063
http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.63de.3840
work_keys_str_mv AT cummerowjulia medicalstudentscopingwithstressanditspredictorsacrosssectionalstudy
AT obstkatrin medicalstudentscopingwithstressanditspredictorsacrosssectionalstudy
AT voltmeredgar medicalstudentscopingwithstressanditspredictorsacrosssectionalstudy
AT kotterthomas medicalstudentscopingwithstressanditspredictorsacrosssectionalstudy