Cargando…
Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 214 patients with un...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37821778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w |
_version_ | 1785153177763446784 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zhaolin Xie, Tianpeng Li, Fangzhi Wang, Xiaoning Liu, Folin Jiang, Bo Zou, Xiaofeng Zhang, Guoxi Yuan, Yuanhu Xiao, Rihai Wu, Gengqing Qian, Biao |
author_facet | Zhang, Zhaolin Xie, Tianpeng Li, Fangzhi Wang, Xiaoning Liu, Folin Jiang, Bo Zou, Xiaofeng Zhang, Guoxi Yuan, Yuanhu Xiao, Rihai Wu, Gengqing Qian, Biao |
author_sort | Zhang, Zhaolin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 214 patients with unilateral renal calculi treated by NTFS-UAS (n = 102) and T-UAS (n = 112) combined with flexible ureteroscope from August 2021 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), hospitalization time and complication rate (CR) were analyzed. RESULT: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, intraoperative CR, and hospitalization time. The operative time of NTFS-UAS group was significantly shorter than T-UAS group (55.25 ± 11.42 min vs. 59.36 ± 15.59 min; P = 0.028). The NTFS-UAS group obtained significantly higher SFR on 1 day postoperatively (86.3% vs. 75.0%; P = 0.038), and higher SFR on 30 days postoperatively than T-UAS group (91.2% vs. 81.3%; P = 0.037). The hemoglobin loss of NTFS-UAS group (− 0.54 ± 0.69 g/dl) was significantly lower than T-UAS group (− 0.83 ± 0.66 g/dl; P = 0.002). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall CR (11.8% vs. 22.3%; P = 0.041), and infectious CR (8.8% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.037) in the NTFS-UAS group. CONCLUSION: Compared to T-UAS combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi, NTFS-UAS had superiority in higher SFR on 1 day and 30 days postoperatively. Shorter operation time, lower hemoglobin loss, lower incidences of overall and infectious CR were observed in NTFS-UAS group. REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: ChiCTR2300070210; April 5, 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10693513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106935132023-12-04 Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi Zhang, Zhaolin Xie, Tianpeng Li, Fangzhi Wang, Xiaoning Liu, Folin Jiang, Bo Zou, Xiaofeng Zhang, Guoxi Yuan, Yuanhu Xiao, Rihai Wu, Gengqing Qian, Biao World J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 214 patients with unilateral renal calculi treated by NTFS-UAS (n = 102) and T-UAS (n = 112) combined with flexible ureteroscope from August 2021 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), hospitalization time and complication rate (CR) were analyzed. RESULT: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, intraoperative CR, and hospitalization time. The operative time of NTFS-UAS group was significantly shorter than T-UAS group (55.25 ± 11.42 min vs. 59.36 ± 15.59 min; P = 0.028). The NTFS-UAS group obtained significantly higher SFR on 1 day postoperatively (86.3% vs. 75.0%; P = 0.038), and higher SFR on 30 days postoperatively than T-UAS group (91.2% vs. 81.3%; P = 0.037). The hemoglobin loss of NTFS-UAS group (− 0.54 ± 0.69 g/dl) was significantly lower than T-UAS group (− 0.83 ± 0.66 g/dl; P = 0.002). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall CR (11.8% vs. 22.3%; P = 0.041), and infectious CR (8.8% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.037) in the NTFS-UAS group. CONCLUSION: Compared to T-UAS combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi, NTFS-UAS had superiority in higher SFR on 1 day and 30 days postoperatively. Shorter operation time, lower hemoglobin loss, lower incidences of overall and infectious CR were observed in NTFS-UAS group. REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: ChiCTR2300070210; April 5, 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10693513/ /pubmed/37821778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Zhaolin Xie, Tianpeng Li, Fangzhi Wang, Xiaoning Liu, Folin Jiang, Bo Zou, Xiaofeng Zhang, Guoxi Yuan, Yuanhu Xiao, Rihai Wu, Gengqing Qian, Biao Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi |
title | Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi |
title_full | Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi |
title_fullStr | Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi |
title_short | Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi |
title_sort | comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37821778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzhaolin comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT xietianpeng comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT lifangzhi comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT wangxiaoning comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT liufolin comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT jiangbo comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT zouxiaofeng comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT zhangguoxi comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT yuanyuanhu comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT xiaorihai comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT wugengqing comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi AT qianbiao comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi |