Cargando…

Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi

OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 214 patients with un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhaolin, Xie, Tianpeng, Li, Fangzhi, Wang, Xiaoning, Liu, Folin, Jiang, Bo, Zou, Xiaofeng, Zhang, Guoxi, Yuan, Yuanhu, Xiao, Rihai, Wu, Gengqing, Qian, Biao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37821778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w
_version_ 1785153177763446784
author Zhang, Zhaolin
Xie, Tianpeng
Li, Fangzhi
Wang, Xiaoning
Liu, Folin
Jiang, Bo
Zou, Xiaofeng
Zhang, Guoxi
Yuan, Yuanhu
Xiao, Rihai
Wu, Gengqing
Qian, Biao
author_facet Zhang, Zhaolin
Xie, Tianpeng
Li, Fangzhi
Wang, Xiaoning
Liu, Folin
Jiang, Bo
Zou, Xiaofeng
Zhang, Guoxi
Yuan, Yuanhu
Xiao, Rihai
Wu, Gengqing
Qian, Biao
author_sort Zhang, Zhaolin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 214 patients with unilateral renal calculi treated by NTFS-UAS (n = 102) and T-UAS (n = 112) combined with flexible ureteroscope from August 2021 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), hospitalization time and complication rate (CR) were analyzed. RESULT: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, intraoperative CR, and hospitalization time. The operative time of NTFS-UAS group was significantly shorter than T-UAS group (55.25 ± 11.42 min vs. 59.36 ± 15.59 min; P = 0.028). The NTFS-UAS group obtained significantly higher SFR on 1 day postoperatively (86.3% vs. 75.0%; P = 0.038), and higher SFR on 30 days postoperatively than T-UAS group (91.2% vs. 81.3%; P = 0.037). The hemoglobin loss of NTFS-UAS group (− 0.54 ± 0.69 g/dl) was significantly lower than T-UAS group (− 0.83 ± 0.66 g/dl; P = 0.002). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall CR (11.8% vs. 22.3%; P = 0.041), and infectious CR (8.8% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.037) in the NTFS-UAS group. CONCLUSION: Compared to T-UAS combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi, NTFS-UAS had superiority in higher SFR on 1 day and 30 days postoperatively. Shorter operation time, lower hemoglobin loss, lower incidences of overall and infectious CR were observed in NTFS-UAS group. REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: ChiCTR2300070210; April 5, 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106935132023-12-04 Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi Zhang, Zhaolin Xie, Tianpeng Li, Fangzhi Wang, Xiaoning Liu, Folin Jiang, Bo Zou, Xiaofeng Zhang, Guoxi Yuan, Yuanhu Xiao, Rihai Wu, Gengqing Qian, Biao World J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath (NTFS-UAS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data of 214 patients with unilateral renal calculi treated by NTFS-UAS (n = 102) and T-UAS (n = 112) combined with flexible ureteroscope from August 2021 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), hospitalization time and complication rate (CR) were analyzed. RESULT: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, intraoperative CR, and hospitalization time. The operative time of NTFS-UAS group was significantly shorter than T-UAS group (55.25 ± 11.42 min vs. 59.36 ± 15.59 min; P = 0.028). The NTFS-UAS group obtained significantly higher SFR on 1 day postoperatively (86.3% vs. 75.0%; P = 0.038), and higher SFR on 30 days postoperatively than T-UAS group (91.2% vs. 81.3%; P = 0.037). The hemoglobin loss of NTFS-UAS group (− 0.54 ± 0.69 g/dl) was significantly lower than T-UAS group (− 0.83 ± 0.66 g/dl; P = 0.002). There was a significantly lower incidence of overall CR (11.8% vs. 22.3%; P = 0.041), and infectious CR (8.8% vs. 18.8%; P = 0.037) in the NTFS-UAS group. CONCLUSION: Compared to T-UAS combined with flexible ureteroscope for treating unilateral renal calculi, NTFS-UAS had superiority in higher SFR on 1 day and 30 days postoperatively. Shorter operation time, lower hemoglobin loss, lower incidences of overall and infectious CR were observed in NTFS-UAS group. REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: ChiCTR2300070210; April 5, 2023. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-10-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10693513/ /pubmed/37821778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Zhaolin
Xie, Tianpeng
Li, Fangzhi
Wang, Xiaoning
Liu, Folin
Jiang, Bo
Zou, Xiaofeng
Zhang, Guoxi
Yuan, Yuanhu
Xiao, Rihai
Wu, Gengqing
Qian, Biao
Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
title Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
title_full Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
title_fullStr Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
title_short Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
title_sort comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37821778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhaolin comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT xietianpeng comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT lifangzhi comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT wangxiaoning comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT liufolin comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT jiangbo comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT zouxiaofeng comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT zhangguoxi comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT yuanyuanhu comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT xiaorihai comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT wugengqing comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi
AT qianbiao comparisonoftraditionalandnoveltipflexiblesuctioningureteralaccesssheathcombinedwithflexibleureteroscopetotreatunilateralrenalcalculi