Cargando…

Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review

BACKGROUND: Ethnobotanical knowledge about the role of plants in fisheries provides valuable ecological information vital for sustainable management of local resources; however, it is diluted and understudied globally. This literature review aims to map the knowledge of plant use within traditional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendoza, Jimlea Nadezhda, Hanazaki, Natalia, Prūse, Baiba, Martini, Agnese, Bittner, Maria Viktoria, Kochalski, Sophia, Macusi, Edison, Ciriaco, Aimee, Mattalia, Giulia, Sõukand, Renata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00630-3
_version_ 1785153220932272128
author Mendoza, Jimlea Nadezhda
Hanazaki, Natalia
Prūse, Baiba
Martini, Agnese
Bittner, Maria Viktoria
Kochalski, Sophia
Macusi, Edison
Ciriaco, Aimee
Mattalia, Giulia
Sõukand, Renata
author_facet Mendoza, Jimlea Nadezhda
Hanazaki, Natalia
Prūse, Baiba
Martini, Agnese
Bittner, Maria Viktoria
Kochalski, Sophia
Macusi, Edison
Ciriaco, Aimee
Mattalia, Giulia
Sõukand, Renata
author_sort Mendoza, Jimlea Nadezhda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ethnobotanical knowledge about the role of plants in fisheries provides valuable ecological information vital for sustainable management of local resources; however, it is diluted and understudied globally. This literature review aims to map the knowledge of plant use within traditional fishing communities. METHODS: Through the PRISMA method, we identified and selected 34 articles reporting the use of plants in fisheries, and including 344 taxa of plants and algae. Uses of plants and algae were grouped into different categories. RESULTS: In the novel categorization of fishery-related uses we proposed, the most mentioned were for fishing and building/repair of fishing artifacts and habitat-related uses, while the records of plants related to fiber uses, providing aid in fishing management and species causing problems, were among the least mentioned. Semi-structured interview is most commonly used with local resource users, especially fishery experts, in exploring perceptions on plant use within traditional fishing communities. Diversity was high in all the recorded families, but most were reported locally. CONCLUSION: Ethnobotanical studies with fishers are not common in the documented literature but they provide a large number of use reports. On the basis this review, in most of the world, the information is of a casual and sporadic nature. Fishers can provide information on aquatic plants and algae that create problems and aid in fishing management, which are crucial in understanding the ecosystem of a region experiencing environmental challenges. This knowledge is greatly understudied globally and undergoing a rapid decline, as highlighted in several of the reviewed articles. Thus, further systematic research on fishery-related uses of plants by fisherfolk is needed considering its potential contribution to the sustainable management of fishery resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00630-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106937122023-12-04 Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review Mendoza, Jimlea Nadezhda Hanazaki, Natalia Prūse, Baiba Martini, Agnese Bittner, Maria Viktoria Kochalski, Sophia Macusi, Edison Ciriaco, Aimee Mattalia, Giulia Sõukand, Renata J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Review BACKGROUND: Ethnobotanical knowledge about the role of plants in fisheries provides valuable ecological information vital for sustainable management of local resources; however, it is diluted and understudied globally. This literature review aims to map the knowledge of plant use within traditional fishing communities. METHODS: Through the PRISMA method, we identified and selected 34 articles reporting the use of plants in fisheries, and including 344 taxa of plants and algae. Uses of plants and algae were grouped into different categories. RESULTS: In the novel categorization of fishery-related uses we proposed, the most mentioned were for fishing and building/repair of fishing artifacts and habitat-related uses, while the records of plants related to fiber uses, providing aid in fishing management and species causing problems, were among the least mentioned. Semi-structured interview is most commonly used with local resource users, especially fishery experts, in exploring perceptions on plant use within traditional fishing communities. Diversity was high in all the recorded families, but most were reported locally. CONCLUSION: Ethnobotanical studies with fishers are not common in the documented literature but they provide a large number of use reports. On the basis this review, in most of the world, the information is of a casual and sporadic nature. Fishers can provide information on aquatic plants and algae that create problems and aid in fishing management, which are crucial in understanding the ecosystem of a region experiencing environmental challenges. This knowledge is greatly understudied globally and undergoing a rapid decline, as highlighted in several of the reviewed articles. Thus, further systematic research on fishery-related uses of plants by fisherfolk is needed considering its potential contribution to the sustainable management of fishery resources. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13002-023-00630-3. BioMed Central 2023-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10693712/ /pubmed/38042774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00630-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Mendoza, Jimlea Nadezhda
Hanazaki, Natalia
Prūse, Baiba
Martini, Agnese
Bittner, Maria Viktoria
Kochalski, Sophia
Macusi, Edison
Ciriaco, Aimee
Mattalia, Giulia
Sõukand, Renata
Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review
title Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review
title_full Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review
title_fullStr Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review
title_full_unstemmed Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review
title_short Ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review
title_sort ethnobotanical contributions to global fishing communities: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13002-023-00630-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mendozajimleanadezhda ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT hanazakinatalia ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT prusebaiba ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT martiniagnese ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT bittnermariaviktoria ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT kochalskisophia ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT macusiedison ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT ciriacoaimee ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT mattaliagiulia ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview
AT soukandrenata ethnobotanicalcontributionstoglobalfishingcommunitiesareview