Cargando…

Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries

BACKGROUND: Effective and durable options for infrapopliteal artery revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are limited. METHODS: The SAVAL trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal artery lesions with total le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Overhagen, Hans, Nakamura, Masato, Geraghty, Patrick J, Rao, Sid, Arroyo, Max, Soga, Yoshimitsu, Iida, Osamu, Armstrong, Ehrin, Nakama, Tatsuya, Fujihara, Masahiko, Ansari, Mohammad M, Mathews, Santhosh J, Gouëffic, Yann, Jaff, Michael R, Weinberg, Ido, Pinto, Duane S, Ohura, Norihiko, Couch, Kara, Mustapha, Jihad A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37844137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X231199489
_version_ 1785153226012622848
author van Overhagen, Hans
Nakamura, Masato
Geraghty, Patrick J
Rao, Sid
Arroyo, Max
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Iida, Osamu
Armstrong, Ehrin
Nakama, Tatsuya
Fujihara, Masahiko
Ansari, Mohammad M
Mathews, Santhosh J
Gouëffic, Yann
Jaff, Michael R
Weinberg, Ido
Pinto, Duane S
Ohura, Norihiko
Couch, Kara
Mustapha, Jihad A
author_facet van Overhagen, Hans
Nakamura, Masato
Geraghty, Patrick J
Rao, Sid
Arroyo, Max
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Iida, Osamu
Armstrong, Ehrin
Nakama, Tatsuya
Fujihara, Masahiko
Ansari, Mohammad M
Mathews, Santhosh J
Gouëffic, Yann
Jaff, Michael R
Weinberg, Ido
Pinto, Duane S
Ohura, Norihiko
Couch, Kara
Mustapha, Jihad A
author_sort van Overhagen, Hans
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective and durable options for infrapopliteal artery revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are limited. METHODS: The SAVAL trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal artery lesions with total lesion length ⩽ 140 mm, stenosis ⩾ 70%, and Rutherford category 4–5 assigned 2:1 to treatment with the SAVAL self-expandable paclitaxel drug-eluting stent (DES) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with an uncoated balloon. The primary effectiveness endpoint was primary vessel patency (i.e., core lab-adjudicated duplex ultrasound-based flow at 12 months in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or surgical bypass of the target lesion). The primary safety endpoint was the 12-month major adverse event (MAE)-free rate; MAEs were defined as a composite of above-ankle index limb amputation, major reintervention, and 30-day mortality. The endpoints were prespecified for superiority (effectiveness) and noninferiority (safety) at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment (N = 130 DES, N = 71 PTA). Target lesion length was 68.1 ± 35.2 mm for the DES group and 68.7 ± 49.2 mm for the PTA group, and 31.0% and 27.6% of patients, respectively, had occlusions. The 12-month primary patency rates were 68.0% for the DES group and 76.0% for the PTA group (P(superiority) = 0.8552). The MAE-free rates were 91.6% and 95.3%, respectively (P(noninferiority) = 0.0433). CONCLUSION: The SAVAL trial did not show benefit related to effectiveness and safety with the nitinol DES compared with PTA in infrapopliteal artery lesions up to 140 mm in length. Continued innovation to provide optimal treatments for CLTI is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03551496)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106937342023-12-04 Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries van Overhagen, Hans Nakamura, Masato Geraghty, Patrick J Rao, Sid Arroyo, Max Soga, Yoshimitsu Iida, Osamu Armstrong, Ehrin Nakama, Tatsuya Fujihara, Masahiko Ansari, Mohammad M Mathews, Santhosh J Gouëffic, Yann Jaff, Michael R Weinberg, Ido Pinto, Duane S Ohura, Norihiko Couch, Kara Mustapha, Jihad A Vasc Med Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Effective and durable options for infrapopliteal artery revascularization for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are limited. METHODS: The SAVAL trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal artery lesions with total lesion length ⩽ 140 mm, stenosis ⩾ 70%, and Rutherford category 4–5 assigned 2:1 to treatment with the SAVAL self-expandable paclitaxel drug-eluting stent (DES) or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with an uncoated balloon. The primary effectiveness endpoint was primary vessel patency (i.e., core lab-adjudicated duplex ultrasound-based flow at 12 months in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or surgical bypass of the target lesion). The primary safety endpoint was the 12-month major adverse event (MAE)-free rate; MAEs were defined as a composite of above-ankle index limb amputation, major reintervention, and 30-day mortality. The endpoints were prespecified for superiority (effectiveness) and noninferiority (safety) at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment (N = 130 DES, N = 71 PTA). Target lesion length was 68.1 ± 35.2 mm for the DES group and 68.7 ± 49.2 mm for the PTA group, and 31.0% and 27.6% of patients, respectively, had occlusions. The 12-month primary patency rates were 68.0% for the DES group and 76.0% for the PTA group (P(superiority) = 0.8552). The MAE-free rates were 91.6% and 95.3%, respectively (P(noninferiority) = 0.0433). CONCLUSION: The SAVAL trial did not show benefit related to effectiveness and safety with the nitinol DES compared with PTA in infrapopliteal artery lesions up to 140 mm in length. Continued innovation to provide optimal treatments for CLTI is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03551496) SAGE Publications 2023-10-16 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10693734/ /pubmed/37844137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X231199489 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
van Overhagen, Hans
Nakamura, Masato
Geraghty, Patrick J
Rao, Sid
Arroyo, Max
Soga, Yoshimitsu
Iida, Osamu
Armstrong, Ehrin
Nakama, Tatsuya
Fujihara, Masahiko
Ansari, Mohammad M
Mathews, Santhosh J
Gouëffic, Yann
Jaff, Michael R
Weinberg, Ido
Pinto, Duane S
Ohura, Norihiko
Couch, Kara
Mustapha, Jihad A
Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries
title Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries
title_full Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries
title_fullStr Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries
title_full_unstemmed Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries
title_short Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries
title_sort primary results of the saval randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37844137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1358863X231199489
work_keys_str_mv AT vanoverhagenhans primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT nakamuramasato primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT geraghtypatrickj primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT raosid primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT arroyomax primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT sogayoshimitsu primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT iidaosamu primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT armstrongehrin primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT nakamatatsuya primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT fujiharamasahiko primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT ansarimohammadm primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT mathewssanthoshj primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT gouefficyann primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT jaffmichaelr primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT weinbergido primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT pintoduanes primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT ohuranorihiko primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT couchkara primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries
AT mustaphajihada primaryresultsofthesavalrandomizedtrialofapaclitaxelelutingnitinolstentversuspercutaneoustransluminalangioplastyininfrapoplitealarteries