Cargando…

The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

INTRODUCTION: Frontoparietal (FPN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) control cognitive functions needed in deductive and inductive reasoning via different functional frameworks. The FPN is a fast intuitive system while the CON is slow and analytical. The default-interventionist model presents a se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seyyed Hashemi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh, Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi, Khosrowabadi, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Neuroscience Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38050565
http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3752.3
_version_ 1785153243458830336
author Seyyed Hashemi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi
Khosrowabadi, Reza
author_facet Seyyed Hashemi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi
Khosrowabadi, Reza
author_sort Seyyed Hashemi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Frontoparietal (FPN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) control cognitive functions needed in deductive and inductive reasoning via different functional frameworks. The FPN is a fast intuitive system while the CON is slow and analytical. The default-interventionist model presents a serial view of the interaction between intuitive and analytic cognitive systems. This study aims to examine the activity pattern of the FPN and CON from the perspective of the default-interventionist model via reasoning. METHODS: We employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate cingulo-opercular and frontoparietal network activities in 24 healthy university students during Raven and Wason reasoning tasks. Due to the different operation times of the CON and FPN, the reaction time was assessed as a behavioral factor. RESULTS: During Raven’s advanced progressive matrices (RAPM) test, both the CON and FPN were activated. Also, with the increase in the difficulty level of the Raven test, a linear increase in response time was observed. In contrast, during the Wason’s selection task (WST) test, only the activity of FPN was observed. CONCLUSION: The results of the study support the hypothesis that the default-interventionist model of dual-process theory provides an accurate explanation of the cognitive mechanisms involved in reasoning. Thus, the response method (intuitive/analytical) determines which cognitive skills and brain regions are involved in responding. HIGHLIGHTS: The cingulo-opercular and fronto-parietal networks (FPNs) control cognitive functions and processes. The frontoparietal network is a fast intuitive system that utilizes short-time attention which is compatible with type 1 processing. In contrast, the cingulo-opercular network (CON) is an analytical time-consuming system that utilizes attention and working memory for a longer time, compatible with type 2 processing. The default-interventionist model of a dual-process theory states that our behaviors are controlled by type 1 processing unless we are confronted with novel and complex problems in which we have no prior experiences. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The present study examined the activity of two task-based brain networks through performing diffrent type of reasoning tasks. Fronto-parietal and Cingulo-opercular are the two task-based brain networks that are responsible for cognitive control. These two brain networks direct the way to use cognitive skills and executive functions which are necessary to perform cognitive tasks especially higher-order ones as reasoning tasks. Since the two types of inductive and deductive reasoning tasks requier two different bottom-up and top-down cognitive control respectively, different cognitive skills would be needed which affect the activity of fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks. Our results showed that through inductive reasoning task which examined by RAVEN, both of the fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks were activated but deductive reasoning task which examined by Wason Selection Card test, just the fronto-parietal brain network was activated. It seems that in the case of deductive reasoninf task, there is a higher probability of errors which lead to giving less correct responses. Based on our results, subjects paid not enough attention to details, so had failure to update informations that leaded to responding with errors. Inactivity of cingulo-opercular network through dedeuctive reasoning task clearly showed that the bottom-up cognitive control did not happen successfully. As a result of that, information processing did not proceed properly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Iranian Neuroscience Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106938092023-12-04 The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Seyyed Hashemi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi Khosrowabadi, Reza Basic Clin Neurosci Research Paper INTRODUCTION: Frontoparietal (FPN) and cingulo-opercular network (CON) control cognitive functions needed in deductive and inductive reasoning via different functional frameworks. The FPN is a fast intuitive system while the CON is slow and analytical. The default-interventionist model presents a serial view of the interaction between intuitive and analytic cognitive systems. This study aims to examine the activity pattern of the FPN and CON from the perspective of the default-interventionist model via reasoning. METHODS: We employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate cingulo-opercular and frontoparietal network activities in 24 healthy university students during Raven and Wason reasoning tasks. Due to the different operation times of the CON and FPN, the reaction time was assessed as a behavioral factor. RESULTS: During Raven’s advanced progressive matrices (RAPM) test, both the CON and FPN were activated. Also, with the increase in the difficulty level of the Raven test, a linear increase in response time was observed. In contrast, during the Wason’s selection task (WST) test, only the activity of FPN was observed. CONCLUSION: The results of the study support the hypothesis that the default-interventionist model of dual-process theory provides an accurate explanation of the cognitive mechanisms involved in reasoning. Thus, the response method (intuitive/analytical) determines which cognitive skills and brain regions are involved in responding. HIGHLIGHTS: The cingulo-opercular and fronto-parietal networks (FPNs) control cognitive functions and processes. The frontoparietal network is a fast intuitive system that utilizes short-time attention which is compatible with type 1 processing. In contrast, the cingulo-opercular network (CON) is an analytical time-consuming system that utilizes attention and working memory for a longer time, compatible with type 2 processing. The default-interventionist model of a dual-process theory states that our behaviors are controlled by type 1 processing unless we are confronted with novel and complex problems in which we have no prior experiences. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The present study examined the activity of two task-based brain networks through performing diffrent type of reasoning tasks. Fronto-parietal and Cingulo-opercular are the two task-based brain networks that are responsible for cognitive control. These two brain networks direct the way to use cognitive skills and executive functions which are necessary to perform cognitive tasks especially higher-order ones as reasoning tasks. Since the two types of inductive and deductive reasoning tasks requier two different bottom-up and top-down cognitive control respectively, different cognitive skills would be needed which affect the activity of fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks. Our results showed that through inductive reasoning task which examined by RAVEN, both of the fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular brain networks were activated but deductive reasoning task which examined by Wason Selection Card test, just the fronto-parietal brain network was activated. It seems that in the case of deductive reasoninf task, there is a higher probability of errors which lead to giving less correct responses. Based on our results, subjects paid not enough attention to details, so had failure to update informations that leaded to responding with errors. Inactivity of cingulo-opercular network through dedeuctive reasoning task clearly showed that the bottom-up cognitive control did not happen successfully. As a result of that, information processing did not proceed properly. Iranian Neuroscience Society 2023 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10693809/ /pubmed/38050565 http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3752.3 Text en Copyright© 2023 Iranian Neuroscience Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research Paper
Seyyed Hashemi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
Tehrani-Doost, Mehdi
Khosrowabadi, Reza
The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
title The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
title_full The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
title_fullStr The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
title_full_unstemmed The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
title_short The Brain Networks Basis for Deductive and Inductive Reasoning: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
title_sort brain networks basis for deductive and inductive reasoning: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38050565
http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2022.3752.3
work_keys_str_mv AT seyyedhashemiseyyedehfatemeh thebrainnetworksbasisfordeductiveandinductivereasoningafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT tehranidoostmehdi thebrainnetworksbasisfordeductiveandinductivereasoningafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT khosrowabadireza thebrainnetworksbasisfordeductiveandinductivereasoningafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT seyyedhashemiseyyedehfatemeh brainnetworksbasisfordeductiveandinductivereasoningafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT tehranidoostmehdi brainnetworksbasisfordeductiveandinductivereasoningafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy
AT khosrowabadireza brainnetworksbasisfordeductiveandinductivereasoningafunctionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudy