Cargando…
The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review
Body mass index (BMI) is an anthropometric index that is commonly used in the medical setting and is a factor in assessing various disease risks but its origins are unknown by many. More importantly, BMI does not properly assess body fat percentage and muscle mass or distinguish abdominal fat from g...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38050494 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48230 |
_version_ | 1785153264198615040 |
---|---|
author | Pray, Rachel Riskin, Suzanne |
author_facet | Pray, Rachel Riskin, Suzanne |
author_sort | Pray, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Body mass index (BMI) is an anthropometric index that is commonly used in the medical setting and is a factor in assessing various disease risks but its origins are unknown by many. More importantly, BMI does not properly assess body fat percentage and muscle mass or distinguish abdominal fat from gluteofemoral fat, which is important to note because abdominal fat is associated with insulin resistance, metabolic disease, and cardiovascular complications. Using a less accurate index to assess the relationship between weight and disease risk is conceptually invalid because the use of BMI ultimately trickles into patient treatment, preventive medicine, and overall health outcomes. Several different anthropometric indices that more accurately assess abdominal adiposity through the incorporation of waist circumference exist and have been extensively studied, such as waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, and a body shape index. It is important that we consider replacing BMI’s usage in the healthcare setting with a different anthropometric index: one that considers height, sex, and race differences, accounts for abdominal adiposity, and more accurately predicts the relationship between obesity, mortality, and diseases such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, insulin resistance, and diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10693914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106939142023-12-04 The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review Pray, Rachel Riskin, Suzanne Cureus Preventive Medicine Body mass index (BMI) is an anthropometric index that is commonly used in the medical setting and is a factor in assessing various disease risks but its origins are unknown by many. More importantly, BMI does not properly assess body fat percentage and muscle mass or distinguish abdominal fat from gluteofemoral fat, which is important to note because abdominal fat is associated with insulin resistance, metabolic disease, and cardiovascular complications. Using a less accurate index to assess the relationship between weight and disease risk is conceptually invalid because the use of BMI ultimately trickles into patient treatment, preventive medicine, and overall health outcomes. Several different anthropometric indices that more accurately assess abdominal adiposity through the incorporation of waist circumference exist and have been extensively studied, such as waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, and a body shape index. It is important that we consider replacing BMI’s usage in the healthcare setting with a different anthropometric index: one that considers height, sex, and race differences, accounts for abdominal adiposity, and more accurately predicts the relationship between obesity, mortality, and diseases such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, insulin resistance, and diabetes. Cureus 2023-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10693914/ /pubmed/38050494 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48230 Text en Copyright © 2023, Pray et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Preventive Medicine Pray, Rachel Riskin, Suzanne The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review |
title | The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review |
title_full | The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review |
title_short | The History and Faults of the Body Mass Index and Where to Look Next: A Literature Review |
title_sort | history and faults of the body mass index and where to look next: a literature review |
topic | Preventive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38050494 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prayrachel thehistoryandfaultsofthebodymassindexandwheretolooknextaliteraturereview AT riskinsuzanne thehistoryandfaultsofthebodymassindexandwheretolooknextaliteraturereview AT prayrachel historyandfaultsofthebodymassindexandwheretolooknextaliteraturereview AT riskinsuzanne historyandfaultsofthebodymassindexandwheretolooknextaliteraturereview |