Cargando…

Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies

AIMS: Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dantas, Pedro, Gonçalves, Sergio R., Grenho, André, Mascarenhas, Vasco, Martins, Jorge, Tavares da Silva, Miguel, Gonçalves, Sergio B., Guimarães Consciência, José
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38043570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1212.BJR-2022-0461.R2
_version_ 1785153266851512320
author Dantas, Pedro
Gonçalves, Sergio R.
Grenho, André
Mascarenhas, Vasco
Martins, Jorge
Tavares da Silva, Miguel
Gonçalves, Sergio B.
Guimarães Consciência, José
author_facet Dantas, Pedro
Gonçalves, Sergio R.
Grenho, André
Mascarenhas, Vasco
Martins, Jorge
Tavares da Silva, Miguel
Gonçalves, Sergio B.
Guimarães Consciência, José
author_sort Dantas, Pedro
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature for hip contact pressures and force in cadaver and in vivo studies, and how joint loading, labral status, and femoral and acetabular morphology can affect these biomechanical parameters. METHODS: We used the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews for this literature search in three databases. After screening, 16 studies were included for the final analysis. RESULTS: The studies assessed different hip conditions like labrum status, the biomechanical effect of the cam, femoral version, acetabular coverage, and the effect of rim trimming. The testing and loading conditions were also quite diverse, and this disparity limits direct comparisons between the different researches. With normal anatomy the mean contact pressures ranged from 1.54 to 4.4 MPa, and the average peak contact pressures ranged from 2 to 9.3 MPa. Labral tear or resection showed an increase in contact pressures that diminished after repair or reconstruction of the labrum. Complete cam resection also decreased the contact pressure, and acetabular rim resection of 6 mm increased the contact pressure at the acetabular base. CONCLUSION: To date there is no standardized methodology to access hip contact biomechanics in hip arthroscopy, or with the preservation of the periarticular soft-tissues. A tendency towards improved biomechanics (lower contact pressures) was seen with labral repair and reconstruction techniques as well as with cam correction. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(12):712–721.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106939372023-12-04 Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies Dantas, Pedro Gonçalves, Sergio R. Grenho, André Mascarenhas, Vasco Martins, Jorge Tavares da Silva, Miguel Gonçalves, Sergio B. Guimarães Consciência, José Bone Joint Res Systematic Review AIMS: Research on hip biomechanics has analyzed femoroacetabular contact pressures and forces in distinct hip conditions, with different procedures, and used diverse loading and testing conditions. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and summarize the available evidence in the literature for hip contact pressures and force in cadaver and in vivo studies, and how joint loading, labral status, and femoral and acetabular morphology can affect these biomechanical parameters. METHODS: We used the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews for this literature search in three databases. After screening, 16 studies were included for the final analysis. RESULTS: The studies assessed different hip conditions like labrum status, the biomechanical effect of the cam, femoral version, acetabular coverage, and the effect of rim trimming. The testing and loading conditions were also quite diverse, and this disparity limits direct comparisons between the different researches. With normal anatomy the mean contact pressures ranged from 1.54 to 4.4 MPa, and the average peak contact pressures ranged from 2 to 9.3 MPa. Labral tear or resection showed an increase in contact pressures that diminished after repair or reconstruction of the labrum. Complete cam resection also decreased the contact pressure, and acetabular rim resection of 6 mm increased the contact pressure at the acetabular base. CONCLUSION: To date there is no standardized methodology to access hip contact biomechanics in hip arthroscopy, or with the preservation of the periarticular soft-tissues. A tendency towards improved biomechanics (lower contact pressures) was seen with labral repair and reconstruction techniques as well as with cam correction. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(12):712–721. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10693937/ /pubmed/38043570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1212.BJR-2022-0461.R2 Text en © 2023 Dantas et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDMThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Dantas, Pedro
Gonçalves, Sergio R.
Grenho, André
Mascarenhas, Vasco
Martins, Jorge
Tavares da Silva, Miguel
Gonçalves, Sergio B.
Guimarães Consciência, José
Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies
title Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies
title_full Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies
title_fullStr Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies
title_full_unstemmed Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies
title_short Hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies
title_sort hip joint contact pressure and force: a scoping review of in vivo and cadaver studies
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38043570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1212.BJR-2022-0461.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT dantaspedro hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies
AT goncalvessergior hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies
AT grenhoandre hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies
AT mascarenhasvasco hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies
AT martinsjorge hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies
AT tavaresdasilvamiguel hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies
AT goncalvessergiob hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies
AT guimaraesconscienciajose hipjointcontactpressureandforceascopingreviewofinvivoandcadaverstudies