Cargando…

Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are the most common fractures among older adults, with most patients undergoing surgery. The debate regarding the type of anesthetic technique for hip fracture surgery is still ongoing. This meta‐analysis aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of spin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hua, Zhu, Ying, Ren, Cheng, Ma, Teng, Li, Ming, Li, Zhong, Xu, Yibo, Wang, Qian, Hu, Jing, Zhang, Kun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13895
_version_ 1785153279212126208
author Lin, Hua
Zhu, Ying
Ren, Cheng
Ma, Teng
Li, Ming
Li, Zhong
Xu, Yibo
Wang, Qian
Hu, Jing
Zhang, Kun
author_facet Lin, Hua
Zhu, Ying
Ren, Cheng
Ma, Teng
Li, Ming
Li, Zhong
Xu, Yibo
Wang, Qian
Hu, Jing
Zhang, Kun
author_sort Lin, Hua
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are the most common fractures among older adults, with most patients undergoing surgery. The debate regarding the type of anesthetic technique for hip fracture surgery is still ongoing. This meta‐analysis aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: Eligible studies that compared the effects of spinal and general anesthesia were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until May 27, 2022. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of the two anesthesia techniques were compared. Quality assessment, heterogeneity analysis, and publication bias of the studies were also assessed. RESULTS: Nine articles of methodological quality were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled results revealed that there were significant differences in hypotension (risk ratio [RR] (95% confidence interval [CI]) = 0.81 (0.68, 0.97), p = 0.02) and ephedrine dose (weighted mean difference [WMD] [95%CI] = −20.94 [−37.50, −4.37] mg, p = 0.01) between the spinal and general anesthesia groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the use of ephedrine (RR [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.19, 3.05]), blood loss (WMD [95%CI] = −34.38 [−89.56, 20.80) mL], myocardial infarction (RR [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.31, 1.94] mL), heart failure (RR [95% CI] = 0.87 [0.17, 4.36] mL), stroke (RR [95%CI) = 0.65 [0.22, 1.95] mL), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.17, 4.35] mL), delirium (RR [95% CI] = 1.08 [0.89, 1.31] mL), and mortality (RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [0.72, 1.68] mL) (all p < 0.05). No publication bias was observed in any of the included studies. CONCLUSION: Compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative hypotension and lower doses of ephedrine in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10693995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106939952023-12-05 Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Lin, Hua Zhu, Ying Ren, Cheng Ma, Teng Li, Ming Li, Zhong Xu, Yibo Wang, Qian Hu, Jing Zhang, Kun Orthop Surg Research Articles OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are the most common fractures among older adults, with most patients undergoing surgery. The debate regarding the type of anesthetic technique for hip fracture surgery is still ongoing. This meta‐analysis aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. METHODS: Eligible studies that compared the effects of spinal and general anesthesia were systematically searched from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until May 27, 2022. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of the two anesthesia techniques were compared. Quality assessment, heterogeneity analysis, and publication bias of the studies were also assessed. RESULTS: Nine articles of methodological quality were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled results revealed that there were significant differences in hypotension (risk ratio [RR] (95% confidence interval [CI]) = 0.81 (0.68, 0.97), p = 0.02) and ephedrine dose (weighted mean difference [WMD] [95%CI] = −20.94 [−37.50, −4.37] mg, p = 0.01) between the spinal and general anesthesia groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the use of ephedrine (RR [95% CI] = 0.77 [0.19, 3.05]), blood loss (WMD [95%CI] = −34.38 [−89.56, 20.80) mL], myocardial infarction (RR [95% CI] = 0.78 [0.31, 1.94] mL), heart failure (RR [95% CI] = 0.87 [0.17, 4.36] mL), stroke (RR [95%CI) = 0.65 [0.22, 1.95] mL), postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.17, 4.35] mL), delirium (RR [95% CI] = 1.08 [0.89, 1.31] mL), and mortality (RR [95% CI] = 1.10 [0.72, 1.68] mL) (all p < 0.05). No publication bias was observed in any of the included studies. CONCLUSION: Compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative hypotension and lower doses of ephedrine in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10693995/ /pubmed/37753546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13895 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Lin, Hua
Zhu, Ying
Ren, Cheng
Ma, Teng
Li, Ming
Li, Zhong
Xu, Yibo
Wang, Qian
Hu, Jing
Zhang, Kun
Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_short Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_sort comparing the effect of spinal and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in older patients: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37753546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.13895
work_keys_str_mv AT linhua comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT zhuying comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT rencheng comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT mateng comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT liming comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT lizhong comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT xuyibo comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT wangqian comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT hujing comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT zhangkun comparingtheeffectofspinalandgeneralanesthesiaforhipfracturesurgeryinolderpatientsametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials