Sequential Correction versus Conventional Correction for Severe and Rigid Kyphoscoliosis: A Retrospective Case Control Study

OBJECTIVE: Conventional correction techniques were challenging and of high risk of neurological complications for the correction of severe and rigid kyphoscoliosis. A new technical note we developed and named as sequential correction, was used to treat severe and rigid kyphoscoliosis. The present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of sequential correction versus conventional correction for the treatment of severe and rigid kyphoscoliosis. METHODS: This is a respectively case–control study. Between January 2014 and December 2019, 36 adults underwent the surgical correction of severe and rigid kyphoscoliosis and were included in the present study. Among them, 20 adults underwent conventional correction, 16 adults underwent sequential correction. Major curve Cobb angle, kyphotic angle, coronal imbalance, and sagittal vertical axis were compared between two groups. The patient‐reported health‐related quality of life outcomes, including the Oswestry disability index score, and SRS‐22 questionnaire, were recorded. Independent samples t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed‐rank test, were used to compare the differences between two groups according to the results of normal distribution test. RESULTS: In conventional correction group, the mean major curve Cobb angle was 122.50° preoperatively, 40.35° immediately after surgery, and 43.95° at final follow‐up postoperatively; the mean kyphotic angle was 97.45° preoperatively, 34.45° immediately after surgery, and 38.30° at final follow‐up postoperatively. In the sequential correction group, the mean major angle was 134.44° preoperatively, 44.56° immediately after surgery, and 46.25° at final follow‐up postoperatively; the mean kyphotic angle was 112.31° preoperatively, 39.00° immediately after surgery, and 40.38° at final follow‐up postoperatively. The mean major curve Cobb angle and kyphotic angle of both groups were improved significantly, while there were no significant differences between two groups (p > 0.001). Improved self‐reported quality of life scores were achieved postoperatively and at final follow‐up postoperatively, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. The total complication rate of the patients underwent conventional correction was 55%, and the total complication rate of the patients underwent sequential correction was 43.75%. The complication rate of the two groups showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential correction is an excellent and safe treatment for severe and rigid kyphoscoliosis in adults, with similar clinical outcomes with conventional correction. The total complication rate of the patients who underwent sequential correction was slightly lower than conventional correction.