Cargando…

Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study

BACKGROUND: In the present study, the effects of distalizations of one and two molars with different step distances and attachment designs have been analyzed. METHODS: A 3D finite element analysis model has been developed in order to determine the tendency of tooth displacement and stress distributi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Jie, Guo, Donghui, Zhang, Xu, Cheng, Yuxun, Zhang, Hao, Xu, Yuerong, Jin, Zuolin, Ma, Yanning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38044352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00493-0
_version_ 1785153303020044288
author Gao, Jie
Guo, Donghui
Zhang, Xu
Cheng, Yuxun
Zhang, Hao
Xu, Yuerong
Jin, Zuolin
Ma, Yanning
author_facet Gao, Jie
Guo, Donghui
Zhang, Xu
Cheng, Yuxun
Zhang, Hao
Xu, Yuerong
Jin, Zuolin
Ma, Yanning
author_sort Gao, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the present study, the effects of distalizations of one and two molars with different step distances and attachment designs have been analyzed. METHODS: A 3D finite element analysis model has been developed in order to determine the tendency of tooth displacement and stress distribution with clear aligner treatment. RESULTS: Under the condition of single-molar distalization, when the step distance was set to 0.25 mm, the total displacement was 0.086 mm for central incisors, 0.080 mm for lateral incisors, 0.084 mm for canines, 0.102 mm for the first premolar and 0.076 mm for the second premolar. The von Mises stress of roots and the principal stress of the periodontal ligament was slightly lower than in the control group when the step distance was set to 0.130 mm. Under the condition of two-molar distalization, when the step distance was set to 0.130 mm, the total displacements for central incisors, lateral incisors and canines as well as both the first and second maxillary molars were basically the same as with a distance of 0.250 mm for one-molar distalization. In addition, when the step distance was 0.130 mm with two-molar distalization, the rotation center of the first and second molar was closer to the apex of the root indicating that the smaller step distance led to more bodily movement during the two-molar distalization. However, displacement tendencies of the first molar and the second molar were basically the same whether horizontal or vertical rectangular attachments were added. CONCLUSIONS: A step distance of moving two molars to 0.130 mm can achieve the same reaction force on the anterior teeth as moving one molar 0.250 mm without effects on horizontal or vertical rectangular attachments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results provide a theoretical basis and guidance for simultaneously moving two molars backward in clinical practice using a clear aligner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10694119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106941192023-12-05 Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study Gao, Jie Guo, Donghui Zhang, Xu Cheng, Yuxun Zhang, Hao Xu, Yuerong Jin, Zuolin Ma, Yanning Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: In the present study, the effects of distalizations of one and two molars with different step distances and attachment designs have been analyzed. METHODS: A 3D finite element analysis model has been developed in order to determine the tendency of tooth displacement and stress distribution with clear aligner treatment. RESULTS: Under the condition of single-molar distalization, when the step distance was set to 0.25 mm, the total displacement was 0.086 mm for central incisors, 0.080 mm for lateral incisors, 0.084 mm for canines, 0.102 mm for the first premolar and 0.076 mm for the second premolar. The von Mises stress of roots and the principal stress of the periodontal ligament was slightly lower than in the control group when the step distance was set to 0.130 mm. Under the condition of two-molar distalization, when the step distance was set to 0.130 mm, the total displacements for central incisors, lateral incisors and canines as well as both the first and second maxillary molars were basically the same as with a distance of 0.250 mm for one-molar distalization. In addition, when the step distance was 0.130 mm with two-molar distalization, the rotation center of the first and second molar was closer to the apex of the root indicating that the smaller step distance led to more bodily movement during the two-molar distalization. However, displacement tendencies of the first molar and the second molar were basically the same whether horizontal or vertical rectangular attachments were added. CONCLUSIONS: A step distance of moving two molars to 0.130 mm can achieve the same reaction force on the anterior teeth as moving one molar 0.250 mm without effects on horizontal or vertical rectangular attachments. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results provide a theoretical basis and guidance for simultaneously moving two molars backward in clinical practice using a clear aligner. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10694119/ /pubmed/38044352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00493-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Gao, Jie
Guo, Donghui
Zhang, Xu
Cheng, Yuxun
Zhang, Hao
Xu, Yuerong
Jin, Zuolin
Ma, Yanning
Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study
title Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study
title_full Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study
title_fullStr Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study
title_short Biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study
title_sort biomechanical effects of different staging and attachment designs in maxillary molar distalization with clear aligner: a finite element study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38044352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00493-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gaojie biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy
AT guodonghui biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy
AT zhangxu biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy
AT chengyuxun biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy
AT zhanghao biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy
AT xuyuerong biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy
AT jinzuolin biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy
AT mayanning biomechanicaleffectsofdifferentstagingandattachmentdesignsinmaxillarymolardistalizationwithclearalignerafiniteelementstudy