Cargando…

Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing

Estimation of biophysical vegetation variables is of interest for diverse applications, such as monitoring of crop growth and health or yield prediction. However, remote estimation of these variables remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of plant architecture, biology and surrounding en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlier, Alexis, Dandrifosse, Sébastien, Dumont, Benjamin, Mercatoris, Benoit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694231/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1204791
_version_ 1785153329141121024
author Carlier, Alexis
Dandrifosse, Sébastien
Dumont, Benjamin
Mercatoris, Benoit
author_facet Carlier, Alexis
Dandrifosse, Sébastien
Dumont, Benjamin
Mercatoris, Benoit
author_sort Carlier, Alexis
collection PubMed
description Estimation of biophysical vegetation variables is of interest for diverse applications, such as monitoring of crop growth and health or yield prediction. However, remote estimation of these variables remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of plant architecture, biology and surrounding environment, and the need for features engineering. Recent advancements in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNN), offer promising solutions to address this challenge. Unfortunately, the limited availability of labeled data has hindered the exploration of CNNs for regression tasks, especially in the frame of crop phenotyping. In this study, the effectiveness of various CNN models in predicting wheat dry matter, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen concentration from RGB and multispectral images taken from tillering to maturity was examined. To overcome the scarcity of labeled data, a training pipeline was devised. This pipeline involves transfer learning, pseudo-labeling of unlabeled data and temporal relationship correction. The results demonstrated that CNN models significantly benefit from the pseudolabeling method, while the machine learning approach employing a PLSr did not show comparable performance. Among the models evaluated, EfficientNetB4 achieved the highest accuracy for predicting above-ground biomass, with an R² value of 0.92. In contrast, Resnet50 demonstrated superior performance in predicting LAI, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen concentration, with R² values of 0.82, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively. Moreover, the study explored multi-output models to predict the distribution of dry matter and nitrogen uptake between stem, inferior leaves, flag leaf, and ear. The findings indicate that CNNs hold promise as accessible and promising tools for phenotyping quantitative biophysical variables of crops. However, further research is required to harness their full potential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10694231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106942312023-12-05 Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing Carlier, Alexis Dandrifosse, Sébastien Dumont, Benjamin Mercatoris, Benoit Front Plant Sci Plant Science Estimation of biophysical vegetation variables is of interest for diverse applications, such as monitoring of crop growth and health or yield prediction. However, remote estimation of these variables remains challenging due to the inherent complexity of plant architecture, biology and surrounding environment, and the need for features engineering. Recent advancements in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNN), offer promising solutions to address this challenge. Unfortunately, the limited availability of labeled data has hindered the exploration of CNNs for regression tasks, especially in the frame of crop phenotyping. In this study, the effectiveness of various CNN models in predicting wheat dry matter, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen concentration from RGB and multispectral images taken from tillering to maturity was examined. To overcome the scarcity of labeled data, a training pipeline was devised. This pipeline involves transfer learning, pseudo-labeling of unlabeled data and temporal relationship correction. The results demonstrated that CNN models significantly benefit from the pseudolabeling method, while the machine learning approach employing a PLSr did not show comparable performance. Among the models evaluated, EfficientNetB4 achieved the highest accuracy for predicting above-ground biomass, with an R² value of 0.92. In contrast, Resnet50 demonstrated superior performance in predicting LAI, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen concentration, with R² values of 0.82, 0.73, and 0.80, respectively. Moreover, the study explored multi-output models to predict the distribution of dry matter and nitrogen uptake between stem, inferior leaves, flag leaf, and ear. The findings indicate that CNNs hold promise as accessible and promising tools for phenotyping quantitative biophysical variables of crops. However, further research is required to harness their full potential. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10694231/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1204791 Text en Copyright © 2023 Carlier, Dandrifosse, Dumont and Mercatoris https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Carlier, Alexis
Dandrifosse, Sébastien
Dumont, Benjamin
Mercatoris, Benoit
Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing
title Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing
title_full Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing
title_fullStr Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing
title_full_unstemmed Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing
title_short Comparing CNNs and PLSr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing
title_sort comparing cnns and plsr for estimating wheat organs biophysical variables using proximal sensing
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694231/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1204791
work_keys_str_mv AT carlieralexis comparingcnnsandplsrforestimatingwheatorgansbiophysicalvariablesusingproximalsensing
AT dandrifossesebastien comparingcnnsandplsrforestimatingwheatorgansbiophysicalvariablesusingproximalsensing
AT dumontbenjamin comparingcnnsandplsrforestimatingwheatorgansbiophysicalvariablesusingproximalsensing
AT mercatorisbenoit comparingcnnsandplsrforestimatingwheatorgansbiophysicalvariablesusingproximalsensing