Cargando…

Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis

BACKGROUND: To better understand the biomechanical profile of direct head impacts and the game scenarios in which they occur in Rugby Union, there is a need for an on-field validation of a new instrumented mouthguard (IMG) against the reference standard. This study considers the potential of a combi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Field, Byron, Waddington, Gordon, McKune, Andrew, Goecke, Roland, Gardner, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694248/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1230202
_version_ 1785153333197012992
author Field, Byron
Waddington, Gordon
McKune, Andrew
Goecke, Roland
Gardner, Andrew J.
author_facet Field, Byron
Waddington, Gordon
McKune, Andrew
Goecke, Roland
Gardner, Andrew J.
author_sort Field, Byron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To better understand the biomechanical profile of direct head impacts and the game scenarios in which they occur in Rugby Union, there is a need for an on-field validation of a new instrumented mouthguard (IMG) against the reference standard. This study considers the potential of a combined biomechanical (IMG) and video analysis approach to direct head impact recognition, both of which in isolation have limitations. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between an instrumented mouthguard and video analysis in detection of direct head impacts in rugby union. DESIGN: Pilot Study - Observational Cohort design METHODS: The instrumented mouthguard was worn by ten (3 backs, 7 forwards) professional Rugby Union players during the 2020–21 Gallagher Premiership (UK) season. Game-day video was synchronized with timestamped head acceleration events captured from the instrumented mouthguard. Direct Head Impacts were recorded in a 2 × 2 contingency table to determine sensitivity. Impact characteristics were also collected for all verified head impacts to further the understanding of head biomechanics during the game. RESULTS: There were 2018 contact events that were reviewed using video analysis. Of those 655 were categorized as direct head impacts which also correlated with a head acceleration event captured by the IMG. Sensitivity analysis showed an overall sensitivity of 93.6% and a positive predictive value (PPV of 92.4%). When false positives were excluded due to ball out of play, mouthguard removal or handling after a scoring situation or stoppage, PPV was improved (98.3%). Most verified head impacts occurred in and around the ruck contest (31.2%) followed by impacts to the primary tackler (28.4%). CONCLUSION: This pilot validation study demonstrates that this IMG provides a highly accurate measurement device that could be used to complement video verification in the recognition of on-field direct head impacts. The frequency and magnitude of direct head impacts derived from specific game scenarios has been described and allows for greater recognition of high-risk situations. Further studies with larger sample sizes and in different populations of Rugby Union players are required to develop our understanding of head impact and enable strategies for injury mitigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10694248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106942482023-12-05 Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis Field, Byron Waddington, Gordon McKune, Andrew Goecke, Roland Gardner, Andrew J. Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living BACKGROUND: To better understand the biomechanical profile of direct head impacts and the game scenarios in which they occur in Rugby Union, there is a need for an on-field validation of a new instrumented mouthguard (IMG) against the reference standard. This study considers the potential of a combined biomechanical (IMG) and video analysis approach to direct head impact recognition, both of which in isolation have limitations. The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between an instrumented mouthguard and video analysis in detection of direct head impacts in rugby union. DESIGN: Pilot Study - Observational Cohort design METHODS: The instrumented mouthguard was worn by ten (3 backs, 7 forwards) professional Rugby Union players during the 2020–21 Gallagher Premiership (UK) season. Game-day video was synchronized with timestamped head acceleration events captured from the instrumented mouthguard. Direct Head Impacts were recorded in a 2 × 2 contingency table to determine sensitivity. Impact characteristics were also collected for all verified head impacts to further the understanding of head biomechanics during the game. RESULTS: There were 2018 contact events that were reviewed using video analysis. Of those 655 were categorized as direct head impacts which also correlated with a head acceleration event captured by the IMG. Sensitivity analysis showed an overall sensitivity of 93.6% and a positive predictive value (PPV of 92.4%). When false positives were excluded due to ball out of play, mouthguard removal or handling after a scoring situation or stoppage, PPV was improved (98.3%). Most verified head impacts occurred in and around the ruck contest (31.2%) followed by impacts to the primary tackler (28.4%). CONCLUSION: This pilot validation study demonstrates that this IMG provides a highly accurate measurement device that could be used to complement video verification in the recognition of on-field direct head impacts. The frequency and magnitude of direct head impacts derived from specific game scenarios has been described and allows for greater recognition of high-risk situations. Further studies with larger sample sizes and in different populations of Rugby Union players are required to develop our understanding of head impact and enable strategies for injury mitigation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10694248/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1230202 Text en © 2023 Field, Waddington, McKune, Goecke and Gardner. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Field, Byron
Waddington, Gordon
McKune, Andrew
Goecke, Roland
Gardner, Andrew J.
Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis
title Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis
title_full Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis
title_fullStr Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis
title_short Validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis
title_sort validation of an instrumented mouthguard in rugby union—a pilot study comparing impact sensor technology to video analysis
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694248/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1230202
work_keys_str_mv AT fieldbyron validationofaninstrumentedmouthguardinrugbyunionapilotstudycomparingimpactsensortechnologytovideoanalysis
AT waddingtongordon validationofaninstrumentedmouthguardinrugbyunionapilotstudycomparingimpactsensortechnologytovideoanalysis
AT mckuneandrew validationofaninstrumentedmouthguardinrugbyunionapilotstudycomparingimpactsensortechnologytovideoanalysis
AT goeckeroland validationofaninstrumentedmouthguardinrugbyunionapilotstudycomparingimpactsensortechnologytovideoanalysis
AT gardnerandrewj validationofaninstrumentedmouthguardinrugbyunionapilotstudycomparingimpactsensortechnologytovideoanalysis