Cargando…

Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication

INTRODUCTION: Duplication of the appendix is a very rare presentation. According to the Cave–Wallbridge classification, there are three types of duplicate appendix. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 43 year old female presented with classical symptoms of acute appendicitis, with unremarkable inflammatory mark...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clymo, Jonathon, Courtney, Alona, Carrington, Emma V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37979553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109044
_version_ 1785153341018341376
author Clymo, Jonathon
Courtney, Alona
Carrington, Emma V.
author_facet Clymo, Jonathon
Courtney, Alona
Carrington, Emma V.
author_sort Clymo, Jonathon
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Duplication of the appendix is a very rare presentation. According to the Cave–Wallbridge classification, there are three types of duplicate appendix. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 43 year old female presented with classical symptoms of acute appendicitis, with unremarkable inflammatory markers. The diagnosis was confirmed on pre-operative computer tomography (CT). During laparoscopy two tubular structures were identified: one arising from the tenia libera of the caecum adjacent to the terminal ileum and one retrocaecally at the confluence of the teniae. Both structures were excised using a laparoscopic linear stapler. Histopathological analysis demonstrated the accessory structure to be a microscopically unremarkable blind-ended tubular structure. The other specimen demonstrated acute gangrenous inflammation of the appendix. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home the following day. DISCUSSION: Appendix duplication is rare; however, failure to recognise it in a patient with acute appendicitis could result in a retained source of sepsis, requiring subsequent re-exploration of the abdomen. The case presented here represents a Type B2 according to the Cave-Wallbridge classification and is the most susceptible to inadvertent error due to having appendixes in both typical and atypical anatomical locations. This case also highlights the probability of this diagnosis being missed on pre-operative CT. CONCLUSION: This case report presents a unique opportunity for surgical trainees to review intra-operative laparoscopic images of a duplicate appendix, both to allow them to recognise this pathology if encountered in the future, and to embed the importance of ruling it out with thorough intra-operative examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10694281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106942812023-12-05 Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication Clymo, Jonathon Courtney, Alona Carrington, Emma V. Int J Surg Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Duplication of the appendix is a very rare presentation. According to the Cave–Wallbridge classification, there are three types of duplicate appendix. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 43 year old female presented with classical symptoms of acute appendicitis, with unremarkable inflammatory markers. The diagnosis was confirmed on pre-operative computer tomography (CT). During laparoscopy two tubular structures were identified: one arising from the tenia libera of the caecum adjacent to the terminal ileum and one retrocaecally at the confluence of the teniae. Both structures were excised using a laparoscopic linear stapler. Histopathological analysis demonstrated the accessory structure to be a microscopically unremarkable blind-ended tubular structure. The other specimen demonstrated acute gangrenous inflammation of the appendix. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home the following day. DISCUSSION: Appendix duplication is rare; however, failure to recognise it in a patient with acute appendicitis could result in a retained source of sepsis, requiring subsequent re-exploration of the abdomen. The case presented here represents a Type B2 according to the Cave-Wallbridge classification and is the most susceptible to inadvertent error due to having appendixes in both typical and atypical anatomical locations. This case also highlights the probability of this diagnosis being missed on pre-operative CT. CONCLUSION: This case report presents a unique opportunity for surgical trainees to review intra-operative laparoscopic images of a duplicate appendix, both to allow them to recognise this pathology if encountered in the future, and to embed the importance of ruling it out with thorough intra-operative examination. Elsevier 2023-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10694281/ /pubmed/37979553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109044 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Clymo, Jonathon
Courtney, Alona
Carrington, Emma V.
Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication
title Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication
title_full Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication
title_fullStr Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication
title_full_unstemmed Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication
title_short Case report: Acute appendicitis in appendix duplication
title_sort case report: acute appendicitis in appendix duplication
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37979553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.109044
work_keys_str_mv AT clymojonathon casereportacuteappendicitisinappendixduplication
AT courtneyalona casereportacuteappendicitisinappendixduplication
AT carringtonemmav casereportacuteappendicitisinappendixduplication