Cargando…

Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study

STUDY QUESTION: Does the transfer of single low-grade blastocysts result in acceptable reproductive and perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of single good-grade blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER: The transfer of single low-grade blastocysts resulted in a reduced live birth rate of around 30% (14%...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zou, Haowen, Kemper, James M, Hammond, Elizabeth R, Xu, Fengqin, Liu, Gensheng, Xue, Lintao, Bai, Xiaohong, Liao, Hongqing, Xue, Songguo, Zhao, Shuqin, Xia, Lan, Scott, Jean, Chapple, Vincent, Afnan, Masoud, Morbeck, Dean E, Mol, Ben W J, Liu, Yanhe, Wang, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead212
_version_ 1785153368603230208
author Zou, Haowen
Kemper, James M
Hammond, Elizabeth R
Xu, Fengqin
Liu, Gensheng
Xue, Lintao
Bai, Xiaohong
Liao, Hongqing
Xue, Songguo
Zhao, Shuqin
Xia, Lan
Scott, Jean
Chapple, Vincent
Afnan, Masoud
Morbeck, Dean E
Mol, Ben W J
Liu, Yanhe
Wang, Rui
author_facet Zou, Haowen
Kemper, James M
Hammond, Elizabeth R
Xu, Fengqin
Liu, Gensheng
Xue, Lintao
Bai, Xiaohong
Liao, Hongqing
Xue, Songguo
Zhao, Shuqin
Xia, Lan
Scott, Jean
Chapple, Vincent
Afnan, Masoud
Morbeck, Dean E
Mol, Ben W J
Liu, Yanhe
Wang, Rui
author_sort Zou, Haowen
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: Does the transfer of single low-grade blastocysts result in acceptable reproductive and perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of single good-grade blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER: The transfer of single low-grade blastocysts resulted in a reduced live birth rate of around 30% (14% for very low-grade blastocysts) compared to 44% for single good-grade blastocysts, but does not lead to more adverse perinatal outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is known that low-grade blastocysts can result in live births. However, the current studies are limited by relatively small sample sizes and single-centre designs. Furthermore, evidence on perinatal outcomes after transferring low-grade blastocysts is limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a multi-centre, multi-national retrospective cohort study of 10 018 women undergoing 10 964 single blastocyst transfer cycles between 2009 and 2020 from 14 clinics across Australia, China, and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Blastocysts were graded individually based on assessment of the morphology and development of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE), and were grouped into three quality categories: good- (AB, AB, or BA), moderate- (BB), and low-grade (grade C for ICM or TE) blastocysts. CC blastocysts were individually grouped as very low-grade blastocysts. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was used to analyse the association between blastocyst quality and live birth as well as other reproductive outcomes. Binomial, multinomial logistic, or linear regression was used to investigate the association between blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes. Odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR (aOR), adjusted regression coefficient, and their 95% CIs are presented. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 4386 good-grade blastocysts, 3735 moderate-grade blastocysts, and 2843 low-grade blastocysts were included in the analysis, for which the live birth rates were 44.4%, 38.6%, and 30.2%, respectively. Compared to good-grade blastocysts, the live birth rate of low-grade blastocysts was significantly lower (aOR of 0.48 (0.41–0.55)). Very low-grade blastocysts were associated with an even lower live birth rate (aOR 0.30 (0.18–0.52)) and their absolute live birth rate was 13.7%. There were 4132 singleton live births included in the analysis of perinatal outcomes. Compared with good-grade blastocysts, low-grade blastocysts had comparable preterm birth rates (<37 weeks, aOR 1.00 (0.65–1.54)), birthweight Z-scores (adjusted regression coefficient 0.02 (0.09–0.14)), and rates of very low birth weight (<1500 g, aOR 0.84 (0.22–3.25)), low birth weight (1500–2500 g, aOR 0.96 (0.56–1.65)), high birth weight (>4500 g, aOR 0.93 (0.37–2.32)), small for gestational age (aOR 1.63 (0.91–2.93)), and large for gestational age (aOR 1.28 (0.97–1.70)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the nature of the retrospective design, residual confounding could not be excluded. In addition, the number of events for some perinatal outcomes was small. Between-operator and between-laboratory variations in blastocyst assessment were difficult to control. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Patients undergoing IVF should be informed that low-grade blastocysts result in a lower live birth rate, however they do not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Further research should focus on the criteria for embryos that should not be transferred and on the follow-up of long-term outcomes of offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): H.Z. is supported by a Monash Research Scholarship. B.W.J.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). R.W. is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator grant (2009767). B.W.J.M. reports consultancy, travel support, and research funding from Merck. The other authors do not have competing interests to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10694400
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106944002023-12-05 Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study Zou, Haowen Kemper, James M Hammond, Elizabeth R Xu, Fengqin Liu, Gensheng Xue, Lintao Bai, Xiaohong Liao, Hongqing Xue, Songguo Zhao, Shuqin Xia, Lan Scott, Jean Chapple, Vincent Afnan, Masoud Morbeck, Dean E Mol, Ben W J Liu, Yanhe Wang, Rui Hum Reprod Original Article STUDY QUESTION: Does the transfer of single low-grade blastocysts result in acceptable reproductive and perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of single good-grade blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER: The transfer of single low-grade blastocysts resulted in a reduced live birth rate of around 30% (14% for very low-grade blastocysts) compared to 44% for single good-grade blastocysts, but does not lead to more adverse perinatal outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is known that low-grade blastocysts can result in live births. However, the current studies are limited by relatively small sample sizes and single-centre designs. Furthermore, evidence on perinatal outcomes after transferring low-grade blastocysts is limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted a multi-centre, multi-national retrospective cohort study of 10 018 women undergoing 10 964 single blastocyst transfer cycles between 2009 and 2020 from 14 clinics across Australia, China, and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Blastocysts were graded individually based on assessment of the morphology and development of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE), and were grouped into three quality categories: good- (AB, AB, or BA), moderate- (BB), and low-grade (grade C for ICM or TE) blastocysts. CC blastocysts were individually grouped as very low-grade blastocysts. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was used to analyse the association between blastocyst quality and live birth as well as other reproductive outcomes. Binomial, multinomial logistic, or linear regression was used to investigate the association between blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes. Odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR (aOR), adjusted regression coefficient, and their 95% CIs are presented. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 4386 good-grade blastocysts, 3735 moderate-grade blastocysts, and 2843 low-grade blastocysts were included in the analysis, for which the live birth rates were 44.4%, 38.6%, and 30.2%, respectively. Compared to good-grade blastocysts, the live birth rate of low-grade blastocysts was significantly lower (aOR of 0.48 (0.41–0.55)). Very low-grade blastocysts were associated with an even lower live birth rate (aOR 0.30 (0.18–0.52)) and their absolute live birth rate was 13.7%. There were 4132 singleton live births included in the analysis of perinatal outcomes. Compared with good-grade blastocysts, low-grade blastocysts had comparable preterm birth rates (<37 weeks, aOR 1.00 (0.65–1.54)), birthweight Z-scores (adjusted regression coefficient 0.02 (0.09–0.14)), and rates of very low birth weight (<1500 g, aOR 0.84 (0.22–3.25)), low birth weight (1500–2500 g, aOR 0.96 (0.56–1.65)), high birth weight (>4500 g, aOR 0.93 (0.37–2.32)), small for gestational age (aOR 1.63 (0.91–2.93)), and large for gestational age (aOR 1.28 (0.97–1.70)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Due to the nature of the retrospective design, residual confounding could not be excluded. In addition, the number of events for some perinatal outcomes was small. Between-operator and between-laboratory variations in blastocyst assessment were difficult to control. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Patients undergoing IVF should be informed that low-grade blastocysts result in a lower live birth rate, however they do not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Further research should focus on the criteria for embryos that should not be transferred and on the follow-up of long-term outcomes of offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): H.Z. is supported by a Monash Research Scholarship. B.W.J.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). R.W. is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator grant (2009767). B.W.J.M. reports consultancy, travel support, and research funding from Merck. The other authors do not have competing interests to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10694400/ /pubmed/37877423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead212 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zou, Haowen
Kemper, James M
Hammond, Elizabeth R
Xu, Fengqin
Liu, Gensheng
Xue, Lintao
Bai, Xiaohong
Liao, Hongqing
Xue, Songguo
Zhao, Shuqin
Xia, Lan
Scott, Jean
Chapple, Vincent
Afnan, Masoud
Morbeck, Dean E
Mol, Ben W J
Liu, Yanhe
Wang, Rui
Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study
title Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study
title_full Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study
title_fullStr Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study
title_full_unstemmed Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study
title_short Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study
title_sort blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694400/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead212
work_keys_str_mv AT zouhaowen blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT kemperjamesm blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT hammondelizabethr blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT xufengqin blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT liugensheng blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT xuelintao blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT baixiaohong blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT liaohongqing blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT xuesongguo blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT zhaoshuqin blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT xialan blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT scottjean blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT chapplevincent blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT afnanmasoud blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT morbeckdeane blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT molbenwj blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT liuyanhe blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy
AT wangrui blastocystqualityandreproductiveandperinataloutcomesamultinationalmulticentreobservationalstudy