Cargando…

Development of a novel artificial intelligence algorithm to detect pulmonary nodules on chest radiography

Background: In this study, we aimed to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to support pulmonary nodule detection, which will enable physicians to efficiently interpret chest radiographs for lung cancer diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed chest X-ray images obtained from a health exami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Higuchi, Mitsunori, Nagata, Takeshi, Iwabuchi, Kohei, Sano, Akira, Maekawa, Hidemasa, Idaka, Takayuki, Yamasaki, Manabu, Seko, Chihiro, Sato, Atsushi, Suzuki, Junzo, Anzai, Yoshiyuki, Yabuki, Takashi, Saito, Takuro, Suzuki, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Fukushima Society of Medical Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37853640
http://dx.doi.org/10.5387/fms.2023-14
Descripción
Sumario:Background: In this study, we aimed to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to support pulmonary nodule detection, which will enable physicians to efficiently interpret chest radiographs for lung cancer diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed chest X-ray images obtained from a health examination center in Fukushima and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Chest X-ray 14 dataset. We categorized these data into two types: type A included both Fukushima and NIH datasets, and type B included only the Fukushima dataset. We also demonstrated pulmonary nodules in the form of a heatmap display on each chest radiograph and calculated the positive probability score as an index value. Results: Our novel AI algorithms had a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74, a sensitivity of 0.75, and a specificity of 0.60 for the type A dataset. For the type B dataset, the respective values were 0.79, 0.72, and 0.74. The algorithms in both the type A and B datasets were superior to the accuracy of radiologists and similar to previous studies. Conclusions: The proprietary AI algorithms had a similar accuracy for interpreting chest radiographs when compared with previous studies and radiologists. Especially, we could train a high quality AI algorithm, even with our small type B data set. However, further studies are needed to improve and further validate the accuracy of our AI algorithm.