Cargando…

Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?

In recent years, the Royal College of Psychiatrists has been engaged in activities to ensure parity of esteem for mental health within the National Health Service, seeking to bring resources and services more in line with those available for physical health conditions. Central to this has been the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Reilly, Jo, Gibbons, Rachel, Heyland, Simon, Yakeley, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.62
_version_ 1785153436302442496
author O'Reilly, Jo
Gibbons, Rachel
Heyland, Simon
Yakeley, Jessica
author_facet O'Reilly, Jo
Gibbons, Rachel
Heyland, Simon
Yakeley, Jessica
author_sort O'Reilly, Jo
collection PubMed
description In recent years, the Royal College of Psychiatrists has been engaged in activities to ensure parity of esteem for mental health within the National Health Service, seeking to bring resources and services more in line with those available for physical health conditions. Central to this has been the promotion of psychiatry as a profession that takes a biopsychosocial approach, considering all aspects of the patient's presentation and history in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. However, there has been a drift away from considering the psychological aspects of the patient's difficulties in recent years. This potentially has profoundly negative consequences for clinical care, training, workforce retention and the perception of our identity as psychiatrists by our colleagues, our patients and the general public. This editorial describes this issue, considers its causes and suggests potential remedies. It arises from an overarching strategy originating in the Royal College of Psychiatrists Medical Psychotherapy Faculty to ensure parity of esteem for the psychological within the biopsychosocial model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10694692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106946922023-12-05 Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? O'Reilly, Jo Gibbons, Rachel Heyland, Simon Yakeley, Jessica BJPsych Bull Editorial In recent years, the Royal College of Psychiatrists has been engaged in activities to ensure parity of esteem for mental health within the National Health Service, seeking to bring resources and services more in line with those available for physical health conditions. Central to this has been the promotion of psychiatry as a profession that takes a biopsychosocial approach, considering all aspects of the patient's presentation and history in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. However, there has been a drift away from considering the psychological aspects of the patient's difficulties in recent years. This potentially has profoundly negative consequences for clinical care, training, workforce retention and the perception of our identity as psychiatrists by our colleagues, our patients and the general public. This editorial describes this issue, considers its causes and suggests potential remedies. It arises from an overarching strategy originating in the Royal College of Psychiatrists Medical Psychotherapy Faculty to ensure parity of esteem for the psychological within the biopsychosocial model. Cambridge University Press 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10694692/ /pubmed/37578042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.62 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
O'Reilly, Jo
Gibbons, Rachel
Heyland, Simon
Yakeley, Jessica
Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
title Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
title_full Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
title_fullStr Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
title_full_unstemmed Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
title_short Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
title_sort parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.62
work_keys_str_mv AT oreillyjo parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession
AT gibbonsrachel parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession
AT heylandsimon parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession
AT yakeleyjessica parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession