Cargando…
Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession?
In recent years, the Royal College of Psychiatrists has been engaged in activities to ensure parity of esteem for mental health within the National Health Service, seeking to bring resources and services more in line with those available for physical health conditions. Central to this has been the p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.62 |
_version_ | 1785153436302442496 |
---|---|
author | O'Reilly, Jo Gibbons, Rachel Heyland, Simon Yakeley, Jessica |
author_facet | O'Reilly, Jo Gibbons, Rachel Heyland, Simon Yakeley, Jessica |
author_sort | O'Reilly, Jo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, the Royal College of Psychiatrists has been engaged in activities to ensure parity of esteem for mental health within the National Health Service, seeking to bring resources and services more in line with those available for physical health conditions. Central to this has been the promotion of psychiatry as a profession that takes a biopsychosocial approach, considering all aspects of the patient's presentation and history in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. However, there has been a drift away from considering the psychological aspects of the patient's difficulties in recent years. This potentially has profoundly negative consequences for clinical care, training, workforce retention and the perception of our identity as psychiatrists by our colleagues, our patients and the general public. This editorial describes this issue, considers its causes and suggests potential remedies. It arises from an overarching strategy originating in the Royal College of Psychiatrists Medical Psychotherapy Faculty to ensure parity of esteem for the psychological within the biopsychosocial model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10694692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106946922023-12-05 Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? O'Reilly, Jo Gibbons, Rachel Heyland, Simon Yakeley, Jessica BJPsych Bull Editorial In recent years, the Royal College of Psychiatrists has been engaged in activities to ensure parity of esteem for mental health within the National Health Service, seeking to bring resources and services more in line with those available for physical health conditions. Central to this has been the promotion of psychiatry as a profession that takes a biopsychosocial approach, considering all aspects of the patient's presentation and history in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. However, there has been a drift away from considering the psychological aspects of the patient's difficulties in recent years. This potentially has profoundly negative consequences for clinical care, training, workforce retention and the perception of our identity as psychiatrists by our colleagues, our patients and the general public. This editorial describes this issue, considers its causes and suggests potential remedies. It arises from an overarching strategy originating in the Royal College of Psychiatrists Medical Psychotherapy Faculty to ensure parity of esteem for the psychological within the biopsychosocial model. Cambridge University Press 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10694692/ /pubmed/37578042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.62 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial O'Reilly, Jo Gibbons, Rachel Heyland, Simon Yakeley, Jessica Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? |
title | Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? |
title_full | Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? |
title_fullStr | Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? |
title_full_unstemmed | Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? |
title_short | Parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? |
title_sort | parity of esteem within the biopsychosocial model: is psychiatry still a psychological profession? |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37578042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2023.62 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oreillyjo parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession AT gibbonsrachel parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession AT heylandsimon parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession AT yakeleyjessica parityofesteemwithinthebiopsychosocialmodelispsychiatrystillapsychologicalprofession |