Cargando…
Benchmarking Aspects of Ab Initio Fragment Models for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces
[Image: see text] While Coupled-Cluster methods have been proven to provide an accurate description of excited electronic states, the scaling of the computational costs with the system size limits the degree for which these methods can be applied. In this work different aspects of fragment-based app...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37236166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00104 |
_version_ | 1785153462624845824 |
---|---|
author | Barcza, Bónis Szirmai, Ádám B. Tajti, Attila Stanton, John F. Szalay, Péter G. |
author_facet | Barcza, Bónis Szirmai, Ádám B. Tajti, Attila Stanton, John F. Szalay, Péter G. |
author_sort | Barcza, Bónis |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] While Coupled-Cluster methods have been proven to provide an accurate description of excited electronic states, the scaling of the computational costs with the system size limits the degree for which these methods can be applied. In this work different aspects of fragment-based approaches are studied on noncovalently bound molecular complexes with interacting chromophores of the fragments, such as π-stacked nucleobases. The interaction of the fragments is considered at two distinct steps. First, the states localized on the fragments are described in the presence of the other fragment(s); for this we test two approaches. One method is founded on QM/MM principles, only including the electrostatic interaction between the fragments in the electronic structure calculation with Pauli repulsion and dispersion effects added separately. The other model, a Projection-based Embedding (PbE) using the Huzinaga equation, includes both electrostatic and Pauli repulsion and only needs to be augmented by dispersion interactions. In both schemes the extended Effective Fragment Potential (EFP2) method of Gordon et al. was found to provide an adequate correction for the missing terms. In the second step, the interaction of the localized chromophores is modeled for a proper description of the excitonic coupling. Here the inclusion of purely electrostatic contributions appears to be sufficient: it is found that the Coulomb part of the coupling provides accurate splitting of the energies of interacting chromophores that are separated by more than 4 Å. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10694823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106948232023-12-05 Benchmarking Aspects of Ab Initio Fragment Models for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces Barcza, Bónis Szirmai, Ádám B. Tajti, Attila Stanton, John F. Szalay, Péter G. J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] While Coupled-Cluster methods have been proven to provide an accurate description of excited electronic states, the scaling of the computational costs with the system size limits the degree for which these methods can be applied. In this work different aspects of fragment-based approaches are studied on noncovalently bound molecular complexes with interacting chromophores of the fragments, such as π-stacked nucleobases. The interaction of the fragments is considered at two distinct steps. First, the states localized on the fragments are described in the presence of the other fragment(s); for this we test two approaches. One method is founded on QM/MM principles, only including the electrostatic interaction between the fragments in the electronic structure calculation with Pauli repulsion and dispersion effects added separately. The other model, a Projection-based Embedding (PbE) using the Huzinaga equation, includes both electrostatic and Pauli repulsion and only needs to be augmented by dispersion interactions. In both schemes the extended Effective Fragment Potential (EFP2) method of Gordon et al. was found to provide an adequate correction for the missing terms. In the second step, the interaction of the localized chromophores is modeled for a proper description of the excitonic coupling. Here the inclusion of purely electrostatic contributions appears to be sufficient: it is found that the Coulomb part of the coupling provides accurate splitting of the energies of interacting chromophores that are separated by more than 4 Å. American Chemical Society 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10694823/ /pubmed/37236166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00104 Text en © 2023 American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Barcza, Bónis Szirmai, Ádám B. Tajti, Attila Stanton, John F. Szalay, Péter G. Benchmarking Aspects of Ab Initio Fragment Models for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces |
title | Benchmarking Aspects
of Ab Initio Fragment Models
for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces |
title_full | Benchmarking Aspects
of Ab Initio Fragment Models
for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking Aspects
of Ab Initio Fragment Models
for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking Aspects
of Ab Initio Fragment Models
for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces |
title_short | Benchmarking Aspects
of Ab Initio Fragment Models
for Accurate Excimer Potential Energy Surfaces |
title_sort | benchmarking aspects
of ab initio fragment models
for accurate excimer potential energy surfaces |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37236166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barczabonis benchmarkingaspectsofabinitiofragmentmodelsforaccurateexcimerpotentialenergysurfaces AT szirmaiadamb benchmarkingaspectsofabinitiofragmentmodelsforaccurateexcimerpotentialenergysurfaces AT tajtiattila benchmarkingaspectsofabinitiofragmentmodelsforaccurateexcimerpotentialenergysurfaces AT stantonjohnf benchmarkingaspectsofabinitiofragmentmodelsforaccurateexcimerpotentialenergysurfaces AT szalaypeterg benchmarkingaspectsofabinitiofragmentmodelsforaccurateexcimerpotentialenergysurfaces |