Cargando…

Effect of changing the acquisition trajectory of the 3D C-arm (CBCT) on image quality in spine surgery: experimental study using an artificial bone model

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative 3D imaging using cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides improved assessment of implant position and reduction in spine surgery, is used for navigated surgical techniques, and therefore leads to improved quality of care. However, in some cases the image quality is not sufficient to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Privalov, Maxim, Bullert, Benno, Gierse, Jula, Mandelka, Eric, Vetter, Sven Y., Franke, Jochen, Grützner, Paul A., Swartman, Benedict
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38044441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04394-0
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Intraoperative 3D imaging using cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides improved assessment of implant position and reduction in spine surgery, is used for navigated surgical techniques, and therefore leads to improved quality of care. However, in some cases the image quality is not sufficient to correctly assess pedicle screw position and reduction, especially due to metal artifacts. The aim of this study was to investigate whether changing the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT in relation to the pedicle screw position during dorsal instrumentation of the spine can reduce metal artifacts and consequently improve image quality as well as clinical assessability on the artificial bone model. METHODS: An artificial bone model was instrumented with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine region (Th10 to L5). Then, the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT (Cios Spin, Siemens, Germany) to the pedicle screws was systematically changed in 5° steps in angulation (− 30° to + 30°) and swivel (− 30° to + 30°). Subsequently, radiological evaluation was performed by three blinded, qualified raters on image quality using 9 questions (including anatomical structures, implant position, appearance of artifacts) with a score (1–5 points). For statistical evaluation, the image quality of the different acquisition trajectories was compared to the standard acquisition trajectory and checked for significant differences. RESULTS: The angulated acquisition trajectory increased the score for subjective image quality (p < 0.001) as well as the clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p < 0.001) highly significant with particularly strong effects on subjective image quality in the vertebral pedicle region (d = 1.06). Swivel of the acquisition trajectory significantly improved all queried domains of subjective image quality (p < 0.001) as well as clinical assessability of pedicle screw position (p < 0.001). The data show that maximizing the angulation or swivel angle toward 30° provides the best tested subjective image quality. SUMMARY: Angulation and swivel of the acquisition trajectory result in a clinically relevant improvement in image quality in intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) during dorsal instrumentation of the spine.