Cargando…

A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps

BACKGROUND: Abdominally based free flaps are commonly used in breast reconstruction. A frequent complication is venous congestion, which might contribute to around 40% of flap failures. One way to deal with it is venous supercharging. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the scientific e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansson, Emma, Ramakrishnan, Venkat, Morgan, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38044454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03254-9
_version_ 1785153496875532288
author Hansson, Emma
Ramakrishnan, Venkat
Morgan, Mary
author_facet Hansson, Emma
Ramakrishnan, Venkat
Morgan, Mary
author_sort Hansson, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominally based free flaps are commonly used in breast reconstruction. A frequent complication is venous congestion, which might contribute to around 40% of flap failures. One way to deal with it is venous supercharging. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the scientific evidence for the effects of venous supercharging. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane library. The included articles were critically appraised, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. Most studies had serious study limitations and problems with directness. Three studies report ‘routine’ use of venous supercharging and performed it prophylactically in patients who did not have clinical signs of venous congestion. Seventeen studies report on flap complications, of which one is a randomised controlled trial demonstrating statistically significant lower complication rates in the intervention group. The overall certainty of evidence for the effect of a venous supercharging on flap complications, length of hospital stay and operative time, in patients without clinical signs of venous congestion, is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝), and low on and surgical takebacks (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝). Twenty-one studies presented data on strategies and overall certainty of evidence for using radiological findings, preoperative measurements, and clinical risk factors to make decisions on venous supercharging is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊝ ⊝ ⊝). CONCLUSION: There is little scientific evidence for how to predict in which cases, without clinical signs of venous congestion, venous supercharging should be performed. The complication rate might be lower in patients in which a prophylactic venous anastomosis has been performed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022353591). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03254-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10694990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106949902023-12-05 A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps Hansson, Emma Ramakrishnan, Venkat Morgan, Mary World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Abdominally based free flaps are commonly used in breast reconstruction. A frequent complication is venous congestion, which might contribute to around 40% of flap failures. One way to deal with it is venous supercharging. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the scientific evidence for the effects of venous supercharging. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane library. The included articles were critically appraised, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies were included. Most studies had serious study limitations and problems with directness. Three studies report ‘routine’ use of venous supercharging and performed it prophylactically in patients who did not have clinical signs of venous congestion. Seventeen studies report on flap complications, of which one is a randomised controlled trial demonstrating statistically significant lower complication rates in the intervention group. The overall certainty of evidence for the effect of a venous supercharging on flap complications, length of hospital stay and operative time, in patients without clinical signs of venous congestion, is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝), and low on and surgical takebacks (GRADE ⊕ ⊕ ⊝ ⊝). Twenty-one studies presented data on strategies and overall certainty of evidence for using radiological findings, preoperative measurements, and clinical risk factors to make decisions on venous supercharging is very low (GRADE ⊕ ⊝ ⊝ ⊝). CONCLUSION: There is little scientific evidence for how to predict in which cases, without clinical signs of venous congestion, venous supercharging should be performed. The complication rate might be lower in patients in which a prophylactic venous anastomosis has been performed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022353591). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-03254-9. BioMed Central 2023-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10694990/ /pubmed/38044454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03254-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hansson, Emma
Ramakrishnan, Venkat
Morgan, Mary
A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps
title A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps
title_full A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps
title_fullStr A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps
title_short A systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps
title_sort systematic review of the scientific evidence of venous supercharging in autologous breast reconstruction with abdominally based flaps
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10694990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38044454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03254-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hanssonemma asystematicreviewofthescientificevidenceofvenoussupercharginginautologousbreastreconstructionwithabdominallybasedflaps
AT ramakrishnanvenkat asystematicreviewofthescientificevidenceofvenoussupercharginginautologousbreastreconstructionwithabdominallybasedflaps
AT morganmary asystematicreviewofthescientificevidenceofvenoussupercharginginautologousbreastreconstructionwithabdominallybasedflaps
AT hanssonemma systematicreviewofthescientificevidenceofvenoussupercharginginautologousbreastreconstructionwithabdominallybasedflaps
AT ramakrishnanvenkat systematicreviewofthescientificevidenceofvenoussupercharginginautologousbreastreconstructionwithabdominallybasedflaps
AT morganmary systematicreviewofthescientificevidenceofvenoussupercharginginautologousbreastreconstructionwithabdominallybasedflaps