Cargando…

Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Zhikai, Wang, Jiongliang, Wu, Tianqing, He, Minrui, Wang, Juncheng, Pan, Yangxun, Chen, Jinbin, Hu, Dandan, Xu, Li, Zhang, Yaojun, Chen, Minshan, Zhou, Zhongguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695128/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S436062
_version_ 1785153523016531968
author Zheng, Zhikai
Wang, Jiongliang
Wu, Tianqing
He, Minrui
Wang, Juncheng
Pan, Yangxun
Chen, Jinbin
Hu, Dandan
Xu, Li
Zhang, Yaojun
Chen, Minshan
Zhou, Zhongguo
author_facet Zheng, Zhikai
Wang, Jiongliang
Wu, Tianqing
He, Minrui
Wang, Juncheng
Pan, Yangxun
Chen, Jinbin
Hu, Dandan
Xu, Li
Zhang, Yaojun
Chen, Minshan
Zhou, Zhongguo
author_sort Zheng, Zhikai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC. METHODS: A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0–17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8–18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3–35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9–9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0–9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0–15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8–14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106951282023-12-05 Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Zheng, Zhikai Wang, Jiongliang Wu, Tianqing He, Minrui Wang, Juncheng Pan, Yangxun Chen, Jinbin Hu, Dandan Xu, Li Zhang, Yaojun Chen, Minshan Zhou, Zhongguo J Hepatocell Carcinoma Original Research PURPOSE: The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC. METHODS: A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0–17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8–18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3–35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9–9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0–9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0–15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8–14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles. Dove 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10695128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S436062 Text en © 2023 Zheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zheng, Zhikai
Wang, Jiongliang
Wu, Tianqing
He, Minrui
Wang, Juncheng
Pan, Yangxun
Chen, Jinbin
Hu, Dandan
Xu, Li
Zhang, Yaojun
Chen, Minshan
Zhou, Zhongguo
Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy
title Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy
title_full Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy
title_fullStr Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy
title_short Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy
title_sort tenofovir versus entecavir on outcomes of hepatitis b virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after folfox-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695128/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S436062
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengzhikai tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT wangjiongliang tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT wutianqing tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT heminrui tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT wangjuncheng tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT panyangxun tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT chenjinbin tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT hudandan tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT xuli tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT zhangyaojun tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT chenminshan tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy
AT zhouzhongguo tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy