Cargando…
Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy
PURPOSE: The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S436062 |
_version_ | 1785153523016531968 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Zhikai Wang, Jiongliang Wu, Tianqing He, Minrui Wang, Juncheng Pan, Yangxun Chen, Jinbin Hu, Dandan Xu, Li Zhang, Yaojun Chen, Minshan Zhou, Zhongguo |
author_facet | Zheng, Zhikai Wang, Jiongliang Wu, Tianqing He, Minrui Wang, Juncheng Pan, Yangxun Chen, Jinbin Hu, Dandan Xu, Li Zhang, Yaojun Chen, Minshan Zhou, Zhongguo |
author_sort | Zheng, Zhikai |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC. METHODS: A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0–17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8–18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3–35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9–9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0–9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0–15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8–14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10695128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106951282023-12-05 Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Zheng, Zhikai Wang, Jiongliang Wu, Tianqing He, Minrui Wang, Juncheng Pan, Yangxun Chen, Jinbin Hu, Dandan Xu, Li Zhang, Yaojun Chen, Minshan Zhou, Zhongguo J Hepatocell Carcinoma Original Research PURPOSE: The efficacy of entecavir (ETV) versus tenofovir (TDF) on the prognosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent FOLFOX-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) remains unclear. In this study, we compared the outcomes between ETV and TDF in HBV-related advanced HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC. METHODS: A total of 683 patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC and received TDF or ETV between January 2016 and December 2021 were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), HBV reactivation, and liver function of patients were compared between the ETV and TDF groups by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In the PSM cohort, for all patients and patients with ≥ 4 cycles of FOLFOX-HAIC, the median OS in the ETV group (15.2 months, 95% CI: 13.0–17.4 months; 16.6 months, 95% CI: 14.8–18.5 months; respectively) was shorter than that in the TDF group (23.0 months, 95% CI: 10.3–35.6 months; 27.3 months, 95% CI: 16.5-NA months; p=0.024, p=0.028; respectively). The median PFS in the ETV group (8.7 months, 95% CI: 7.9–9.5 months; 8.9 months, 95% CI: 8.0–9.8 months; respectively) was also shorter than that in the TDF group (11.8 months, 95% CI: 8.0–15.6 months; 12.7 months, 95% CI: 10.8–14.6 months; p=0.036, p=0.025; respectively). The rate of HBV reactivation in the ETV group was higher than that in the TDF group (12.3% vs 6.3%, p=0.040; 16.5% vs 6.2%, p=0.037, respectively). For liver function, the rate of ALBI grade that remained stable or improved in the ETV group was lower than that in the TDF group (44.6% vs 57.6%, p=0.006; 37.2% vs 53.8%, p=0.019, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a better prognosis, lower proportion of HBV reactivation, and better preservation of liver function in advanced HBV-HCC patients who underwent FOLFOX-HAIC, especially those who received ≥ 4 cycles. Dove 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10695128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S436062 Text en © 2023 Zheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zheng, Zhikai Wang, Jiongliang Wu, Tianqing He, Minrui Wang, Juncheng Pan, Yangxun Chen, Jinbin Hu, Dandan Xu, Li Zhang, Yaojun Chen, Minshan Zhou, Zhongguo Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy |
title | Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy |
title_full | Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy |
title_short | Tenofovir versus Entecavir on Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After FOLFOX-Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy |
title_sort | tenofovir versus entecavir on outcomes of hepatitis b virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after folfox-hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695128/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S436062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengzhikai tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT wangjiongliang tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT wutianqing tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT heminrui tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT wangjuncheng tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT panyangxun tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT chenjinbin tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT hudandan tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT xuli tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT zhangyaojun tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT chenminshan tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy AT zhouzhongguo tenofovirversusentecavironoutcomesofhepatitisbvirusrelatedhepatocellularcarcinomaafterfolfoxhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapy |