Cargando…

Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China

PURPOSE: The efficacy of mortality risk prediction models among older patients in China remains uncertain. We aimed to validate and compare the performances of the Walter Index, Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and FRAIL Scale in predicting 1-year all-cause mortali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yuanyuan, Liu, Xiaohong, Kang, Lin, Li, Jiaojiao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695131/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S429769
_version_ 1785153523502022656
author Li, Yuanyuan
Liu, Xiaohong
Kang, Lin
Li, Jiaojiao
author_facet Li, Yuanyuan
Liu, Xiaohong
Kang, Lin
Li, Jiaojiao
author_sort Li, Yuanyuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The efficacy of mortality risk prediction models among older patients in China remains uncertain. We aimed to validate and compare the performances of the Walter Index, Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and FRAIL Scale in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality post-discharge in geriatric inpatients in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted at a geriatric ward of a tertiary Hospital in Beijing, including patients aged 70 years or older with a documented comprehensive geriatric assessment, discharged between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patients with a hospital stay ≤24 h or >60 days were excluded. All-cause mortality data within one year of discharge were collected from medical files and telephone interviews between August 2022 and February 2023. Multiple imputation, Logistic regression analysis, Brier scores, C-statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit-test, and calibration plots were employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We included 832 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 77 (74–82) years. One-hundred patients (12.0%) died within one year. After adjusting for covariates—marital status, social support, cigarette use, length of stay, number of medications, hemoglobin levels, handgrip strength, and Short Physical Performance Battery—CCI scores of 3–4 and >4, and increased Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale scores were significantly associated with 1-year mortality risk. The Brier scores varied from 0.07 (Walter Index) to 0.10 (FRAIL Scale). The C-statistic ranged from 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.78) for FRAIL Scale to 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.91) for the Walter Index. Calibration curves showed that the Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale were well calibrated, while the CCI was poor. CONCLUSION: Combining the Brier score, discrimination and calibration, the Walter Index was confirmed for the first time to be the best model to predict the 1-year mortality risk of geriatric inpatients in China among the four models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106951312023-12-05 Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China Li, Yuanyuan Liu, Xiaohong Kang, Lin Li, Jiaojiao Clin Interv Aging Original Research PURPOSE: The efficacy of mortality risk prediction models among older patients in China remains uncertain. We aimed to validate and compare the performances of the Walter Index, Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and FRAIL Scale in predicting 1-year all-cause mortality post-discharge in geriatric inpatients in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted at a geriatric ward of a tertiary Hospital in Beijing, including patients aged 70 years or older with a documented comprehensive geriatric assessment, discharged between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Patients with a hospital stay ≤24 h or >60 days were excluded. All-cause mortality data within one year of discharge were collected from medical files and telephone interviews between August 2022 and February 2023. Multiple imputation, Logistic regression analysis, Brier scores, C-statistics, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit-test, and calibration plots were employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: We included 832 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 77 (74–82) years. One-hundred patients (12.0%) died within one year. After adjusting for covariates—marital status, social support, cigarette use, length of stay, number of medications, hemoglobin levels, handgrip strength, and Short Physical Performance Battery—CCI scores of 3–4 and >4, and increased Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale scores were significantly associated with 1-year mortality risk. The Brier scores varied from 0.07 (Walter Index) to 0.10 (FRAIL Scale). The C-statistic ranged from 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.69–0.78) for FRAIL Scale to 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.91) for the Walter Index. Calibration curves showed that the Walter Index, GPI, and FRAIL Scale were well calibrated, while the CCI was poor. CONCLUSION: Combining the Brier score, discrimination and calibration, the Walter Index was confirmed for the first time to be the best model to predict the 1-year mortality risk of geriatric inpatients in China among the four models. Dove 2023-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10695131/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S429769 Text en © 2023 Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Yuanyuan
Liu, Xiaohong
Kang, Lin
Li, Jiaojiao
Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China
title Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China
title_full Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China
title_fullStr Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China
title_full_unstemmed Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China
title_short Validation and Comparison of Four Mortality Prediction Models in a Geriatric Ward in China
title_sort validation and comparison of four mortality prediction models in a geriatric ward in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695131/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S429769
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuanyuan validationandcomparisonoffourmortalitypredictionmodelsinageriatricwardinchina
AT liuxiaohong validationandcomparisonoffourmortalitypredictionmodelsinageriatricwardinchina
AT kanglin validationandcomparisonoffourmortalitypredictionmodelsinageriatricwardinchina
AT lijiaojiao validationandcomparisonoffourmortalitypredictionmodelsinageriatricwardinchina