Cargando…
Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor
BACKGROUND: The rapid evolution of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) products warrants surveillance of the differences in exposure across device types—modifiable devices (MODs), cartridge (“pod”)-containing devices (PODs), disposable PODs (d-PODs)—and flavors of the products available on the market...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Environmental Health Perspectives
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38048100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP11921 |
_version_ | 1785153534982881280 |
---|---|
author | Aherrera, Angela Lin, Joyce Jy Chen, Rui Tehrani, Mina Schultze, Andrew Borole, Aryan Tanda, Stefan Goessler, Walter Rule, Ana M. |
author_facet | Aherrera, Angela Lin, Joyce Jy Chen, Rui Tehrani, Mina Schultze, Andrew Borole, Aryan Tanda, Stefan Goessler, Walter Rule, Ana M. |
author_sort | Aherrera, Angela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The rapid evolution of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) products warrants surveillance of the differences in exposure across device types—modifiable devices (MODs), cartridge (“pod”)-containing devices (PODs), disposable PODs (d-PODs)—and flavors of the products available on the market. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure and compare metal aerosol concentrations by device type and common flavors. METHODS: We collected aerosol from 104 MODs, 67 PODs (four brands: JUUL, Bo, Suorin, PHIX), and 23 d-PODs (three brands: ZPOD, Bidi, Stig) via droplet deposition in a series of conical pipette tips. Metals and metalloids [aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), tin (Sn), and zinc (Zn)] were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), results were log-transformed for statistical analysis, and concentrations are reported in aerosol units ([Formula: see text]). RESULTS: Of the 12 elements analyzed, concentrations were statistically significantly higher in MOD devices, except for Co and Ni, which were higher in PODs and d-PODs. Of the POD brands analyzed, PHIX had the highest median concentrations among four metals (Al, Ni, Pb, and Sn) compared to the rest of the POD brands. According to POD flavor, seven metals were three to seven orders of magnitude higher in tobacco-flavored aerosol compared to those in mint and mango flavors. Among the d-POD brands, concentrations of four metals (Al, Cu, Ni, and Pb) were higher in the ZPOD brand than in Bidi Stick and Stig devices. According to d-POD flavor, only Cr concentrations were found to be statistically significantly higher in mint than tobacco-flavored d-PODs. DISCUSSION: We observed wide variability in aerosol metal concentrations within and between the different e-cigarette device types, brands, and flavors. Overall, MOD devices generated aerosols with higher metal concentrations than PODs and d-PODs, and tobacco-flavored aerosols contained the highest metal concentrations. Continued research is needed to evaluate additional factors (i.e., nicotine type) that contribute to metal exposure from new and emerging e-cigarette devices in order to inform policy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11921 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10695266 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Environmental Health Perspectives |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106952662023-12-05 Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor Aherrera, Angela Lin, Joyce Jy Chen, Rui Tehrani, Mina Schultze, Andrew Borole, Aryan Tanda, Stefan Goessler, Walter Rule, Ana M. Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: The rapid evolution of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) products warrants surveillance of the differences in exposure across device types—modifiable devices (MODs), cartridge (“pod”)-containing devices (PODs), disposable PODs (d-PODs)—and flavors of the products available on the market. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure and compare metal aerosol concentrations by device type and common flavors. METHODS: We collected aerosol from 104 MODs, 67 PODs (four brands: JUUL, Bo, Suorin, PHIX), and 23 d-PODs (three brands: ZPOD, Bidi, Stig) via droplet deposition in a series of conical pipette tips. Metals and metalloids [aluminum (Al), arsenic (As), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), tin (Sn), and zinc (Zn)] were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), results were log-transformed for statistical analysis, and concentrations are reported in aerosol units ([Formula: see text]). RESULTS: Of the 12 elements analyzed, concentrations were statistically significantly higher in MOD devices, except for Co and Ni, which were higher in PODs and d-PODs. Of the POD brands analyzed, PHIX had the highest median concentrations among four metals (Al, Ni, Pb, and Sn) compared to the rest of the POD brands. According to POD flavor, seven metals were three to seven orders of magnitude higher in tobacco-flavored aerosol compared to those in mint and mango flavors. Among the d-POD brands, concentrations of four metals (Al, Cu, Ni, and Pb) were higher in the ZPOD brand than in Bidi Stick and Stig devices. According to d-POD flavor, only Cr concentrations were found to be statistically significantly higher in mint than tobacco-flavored d-PODs. DISCUSSION: We observed wide variability in aerosol metal concentrations within and between the different e-cigarette device types, brands, and flavors. Overall, MOD devices generated aerosols with higher metal concentrations than PODs and d-PODs, and tobacco-flavored aerosols contained the highest metal concentrations. Continued research is needed to evaluate additional factors (i.e., nicotine type) that contribute to metal exposure from new and emerging e-cigarette devices in order to inform policy. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11921 Environmental Health Perspectives 2023-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10695266/ /pubmed/38048100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP11921 Text en https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/about-ehp/licenseEHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. |
spellingShingle | Research Aherrera, Angela Lin, Joyce Jy Chen, Rui Tehrani, Mina Schultze, Andrew Borole, Aryan Tanda, Stefan Goessler, Walter Rule, Ana M. Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor |
title | Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor |
title_full | Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor |
title_fullStr | Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor |
title_full_unstemmed | Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor |
title_short | Metal Concentrations in E-Cigarette Aerosol Samples: A Comparison by Device Type and Flavor |
title_sort | metal concentrations in e-cigarette aerosol samples: a comparison by device type and flavor |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695266/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38048100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP11921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aherreraangela metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT linjoycejy metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT chenrui metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT tehranimina metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT schultzeandrew metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT borolearyan metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT tandastefan metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT goesslerwalter metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor AT ruleanam metalconcentrationsinecigaretteaerosolsamplesacomparisonbydevicetypeandflavor |