Cargando…
Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology
Analytical verification and validation of immunohistochemical (IHC) tests and their equipment are common practices for today’s anatomic pathology laboratories. Few references or guidelines are available on how this should be performed. The study of Sciensano (the Belgian national competent authority...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2024
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695338/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001165 |
_version_ | 1785153545958326272 |
---|---|
author | Verbeke, Hannelien Van Hecke, Donald Bauraing, Caroline Dierick, Anne Marie Colleye, Orphal Dalle, Ignace Dewachter, Kathleen Guiot, Yves Lequeu, Raphael Vanderheyden, Nancy Zwaenepoel, Karen Croes, Romaric |
author_facet | Verbeke, Hannelien Van Hecke, Donald Bauraing, Caroline Dierick, Anne Marie Colleye, Orphal Dalle, Ignace Dewachter, Kathleen Guiot, Yves Lequeu, Raphael Vanderheyden, Nancy Zwaenepoel, Karen Croes, Romaric |
author_sort | Verbeke, Hannelien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Analytical verification and validation of immunohistochemical (IHC) tests and their equipment are common practices for today’s anatomic pathology laboratories. Few references or guidelines are available on how this should be performed. The study of Sciensano (the Belgian national competent authority regarding licensing of medical laboratories) performed in 2016, demonstrated a significant interlaboratory variation in validation procedures of IHC tests among Belgian laboratories. These results suggest the unavailability of practical information on the approach to the verification and validation of these tests. The existing Belgian Practice Guideline for the implementation of a quality management system in anatomic pathology laboratories has been reviewed to meet this demand and, in addition, to prepare the laboratories for the EU—IVD revised regulations (IVDR). This paper describes Belgian recommendations for the verification and validation of IHC tests before implementation, for ongoing validation, and for revalidation. For each type of test (according to the IVDR classification and the origin) and its intended use (purpose), it addresses how to perform analytical verification/validation by recommending: (1) the number of cases in the validation set, (2) the performance characteristics to be evaluated, (3) the objective acceptance criteria, (4) the evaluation method for the obtained results, and (5) how and when to revalidate. A literature study and a risk analysis taking into account the majority of variables regarding verification/validation of methods have been performed, resulting in an expert consensus recommendation that is a compromise among achievability, affordability, and patient safety. This new consensus recommendation has been incorporated in the aforementioned ISO 15189:2012–based Practice Guideline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10695338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106953382023-12-05 Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology Verbeke, Hannelien Van Hecke, Donald Bauraing, Caroline Dierick, Anne Marie Colleye, Orphal Dalle, Ignace Dewachter, Kathleen Guiot, Yves Lequeu, Raphael Vanderheyden, Nancy Zwaenepoel, Karen Croes, Romaric Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Review Article Analytical verification and validation of immunohistochemical (IHC) tests and their equipment are common practices for today’s anatomic pathology laboratories. Few references or guidelines are available on how this should be performed. The study of Sciensano (the Belgian national competent authority regarding licensing of medical laboratories) performed in 2016, demonstrated a significant interlaboratory variation in validation procedures of IHC tests among Belgian laboratories. These results suggest the unavailability of practical information on the approach to the verification and validation of these tests. The existing Belgian Practice Guideline for the implementation of a quality management system in anatomic pathology laboratories has been reviewed to meet this demand and, in addition, to prepare the laboratories for the EU—IVD revised regulations (IVDR). This paper describes Belgian recommendations for the verification and validation of IHC tests before implementation, for ongoing validation, and for revalidation. For each type of test (according to the IVDR classification and the origin) and its intended use (purpose), it addresses how to perform analytical verification/validation by recommending: (1) the number of cases in the validation set, (2) the performance characteristics to be evaluated, (3) the objective acceptance criteria, (4) the evaluation method for the obtained results, and (5) how and when to revalidate. A literature study and a risk analysis taking into account the majority of variables regarding verification/validation of methods have been performed, resulting in an expert consensus recommendation that is a compromise among achievability, affordability, and patient safety. This new consensus recommendation has been incorporated in the aforementioned ISO 15189:2012–based Practice Guideline. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2024-01 2023-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10695338/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001165 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Review Article Verbeke, Hannelien Van Hecke, Donald Bauraing, Caroline Dierick, Anne Marie Colleye, Orphal Dalle, Ignace Dewachter, Kathleen Guiot, Yves Lequeu, Raphael Vanderheyden, Nancy Zwaenepoel, Karen Croes, Romaric Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology |
title | Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology |
title_full | Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology |
title_fullStr | Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology |
title_full_unstemmed | Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology |
title_short | Belgian Recommendations for Analytical Verification and Validation of Immunohistochemical Tests in Laboratories of Anatomic Pathology |
title_sort | belgian recommendations for analytical verification and validation of immunohistochemical tests in laboratories of anatomic pathology |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695338/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verbekehannelien belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT vanheckedonald belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT bauraingcaroline belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT dierickannemarie belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT colleyeorphal belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT dalleignace belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT dewachterkathleen belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT guiotyves belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT lequeuraphael belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT vanderheydennancy belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT zwaenepoelkaren belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology AT croesromaric belgianrecommendationsforanalyticalverificationandvalidationofimmunohistochemicaltestsinlaboratoriesofanatomicpathology |