Cargando…
In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments
Qualitative assessments of researchers are resource-intensive, untenable in nonmeritocratic settings, and error-prone. Although often derided, quantitative metrics could help improve research practices if they are rigorous, field-adjusted, and centralized.
Autores principales: | Ioannidis, John P. A., Maniadis, Zacharias |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38048328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002408 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The credibility crisis in research: Can economics tools help?
por: Gall, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize
por: Ioannidis, John P. A., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Sugar concentration in nectar: a quantitative metric of crop attractiveness for refined pollinator risk assessments
por: Knopper, Loren D, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Metrics that matter for assessing the ocean biological carbon pump
por: Buesseler, Ken O., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing children’s defense mechanisms with the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Q-sort for Children
por: Di Giuseppe, Mariagrazia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)