Cargando…

Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures

BACKGROUND: Unlike other conventional neck bridge stents, when using the PulseRider (PR), it is not necessary to introduce a microcatheter for stent delivery into the daughter branches from the neck, and it has less intraluminal metal. However, in some cases, securely introducing both leaflets into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanazawa, Ryuzaburo, Uchida, Takanori, Higashida, Tetsuhiro, Watanabe, Saiko, Kono, Takao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695450/
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_656_2023
_version_ 1785153567438405632
author Kanazawa, Ryuzaburo
Uchida, Takanori
Higashida, Tetsuhiro
Watanabe, Saiko
Kono, Takao
author_facet Kanazawa, Ryuzaburo
Uchida, Takanori
Higashida, Tetsuhiro
Watanabe, Saiko
Kono, Takao
author_sort Kanazawa, Ryuzaburo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unlike other conventional neck bridge stents, when using the PulseRider (PR), it is not necessary to introduce a microcatheter for stent delivery into the daughter branches from the neck, and it has less intraluminal metal. However, in some cases, securely introducing both leaflets into daughter vessels may be difficult, leading to coil herniation. This study aimed to present some technical issues in PR deployment. METHODS: Fourteen PR procedures were performed in our institution between August 2021 and June 2023, and T-type PRs were used in all procedures. Four technical points during PR procedures are presented from our experience, as “technical options (Options 1-4)”. All procedures were carried out with T-type PR implants. RESULTS: The PR was successfully placed in all interventions; however, in seven cases (50%), some technique trials were necessary because the leaflets did not unfold in the optimal directions. In Option 1, an introduction procedure with transposition of the daughter artery using a microcatheter is presented. In Option 2, the method for correction of the unfolded leaflet angle is demonstrated. In Option 3, another method for correction of the leaflets is shown. In Option 4, an effective method for neck protection during PR procedures is shown. CONCLUSION: Various options should be considered to achieve appropriate apposition of PR leaflets. These technical options may be safe and effective for successful PR deployment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106954502023-12-05 Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures Kanazawa, Ryuzaburo Uchida, Takanori Higashida, Tetsuhiro Watanabe, Saiko Kono, Takao Surg Neurol Int Technical Notes BACKGROUND: Unlike other conventional neck bridge stents, when using the PulseRider (PR), it is not necessary to introduce a microcatheter for stent delivery into the daughter branches from the neck, and it has less intraluminal metal. However, in some cases, securely introducing both leaflets into daughter vessels may be difficult, leading to coil herniation. This study aimed to present some technical issues in PR deployment. METHODS: Fourteen PR procedures were performed in our institution between August 2021 and June 2023, and T-type PRs were used in all procedures. Four technical points during PR procedures are presented from our experience, as “technical options (Options 1-4)”. All procedures were carried out with T-type PR implants. RESULTS: The PR was successfully placed in all interventions; however, in seven cases (50%), some technique trials were necessary because the leaflets did not unfold in the optimal directions. In Option 1, an introduction procedure with transposition of the daughter artery using a microcatheter is presented. In Option 2, the method for correction of the unfolded leaflet angle is demonstrated. In Option 3, another method for correction of the leaflets is shown. In Option 4, an effective method for neck protection during PR procedures is shown. CONCLUSION: Various options should be considered to achieve appropriate apposition of PR leaflets. These technical options may be safe and effective for successful PR deployment. Scientific Scholar 2023-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10695450/ http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_656_2023 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Kanazawa, Ryuzaburo
Uchida, Takanori
Higashida, Tetsuhiro
Watanabe, Saiko
Kono, Takao
Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures
title Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures
title_full Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures
title_fullStr Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures
title_full_unstemmed Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures
title_short Some technical options for successful PulseRider procedures
title_sort some technical options for successful pulserider procedures
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695450/
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_656_2023
work_keys_str_mv AT kanazawaryuzaburo sometechnicaloptionsforsuccessfulpulseriderprocedures
AT uchidatakanori sometechnicaloptionsforsuccessfulpulseriderprocedures
AT higashidatetsuhiro sometechnicaloptionsforsuccessfulpulseriderprocedures
AT watanabesaiko sometechnicaloptionsforsuccessfulpulseriderprocedures
AT konotakao sometechnicaloptionsforsuccessfulpulseriderprocedures