Cargando…

Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room

To explore the application effect of plan, do, check, action (PDCA) cycle on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscope room. Ninety patients who received digestive endoscopy care before undergoing PDCA circulation mode risk control from January 2022 to April 2022 were select...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yan, Shi, Chunhua, Liu, Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695484/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035885
_version_ 1785153574800457728
author Xu, Yan
Shi, Chunhua
Liu, Yun
author_facet Xu, Yan
Shi, Chunhua
Liu, Yun
author_sort Xu, Yan
collection PubMed
description To explore the application effect of plan, do, check, action (PDCA) cycle on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscope room. Ninety patients who received digestive endoscopy care before undergoing PDCA circulation mode risk control from January 2022 to April 2022 were selected as the Common group. From May 2022 to December 2022, 156 patients who underwent digestive endoscopy care after undergoing PDCA cycle mode risk control were selected as the PDCA group. Compare the infection status of patients in the endoscope room and the qualification of the air in the endoscope room before and after PDCA circulation management. Compare the respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and nursing satisfaction of patients in the Common group and the PDCA group. Compare the qualified rate of endoscopic cavity disinfection before and after PDCA cycle management, the qualified rate of endoscopic external disinfection, and the management score. Four patients in the Common group developed infection, with an infection rate of 4.44%. One case of infection occurred in the PDCA group, with an infection rate of 0.64%. The qualified rate of the endoscope room air in the Common group was 92.22%, while the qualified rate of the endoscope room air in the PDCA group was 98.72%. Compared with the Common group, the infection rate of patients in the PDCA group significantly decreased, and the qualified rate of air in the endoscope room significantly increased. The respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, nursing errors, and nursing complaint rates of patients in the PDCA group were significantly lower than those in the Common group, and nursing satisfaction was significantly higher than those in the Common group. The qualified rate of endoscopic cavity disinfection and endoscopic external disinfection in the PDCA group were significantly higher than those in the Common group. Compared with before management, the scores of post management, nursing safety, disinfection and isolation, instruments, theoretical tests, and operational tests of nursing personnel after management increased significantly. The PDCA cycle is well applied in nursing quality management and risk control in the digestive endoscope room.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106954842023-12-05 Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room Xu, Yan Shi, Chunhua Liu, Yun Medicine (Baltimore) 5400 To explore the application effect of plan, do, check, action (PDCA) cycle on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscope room. Ninety patients who received digestive endoscopy care before undergoing PDCA circulation mode risk control from January 2022 to April 2022 were selected as the Common group. From May 2022 to December 2022, 156 patients who underwent digestive endoscopy care after undergoing PDCA cycle mode risk control were selected as the PDCA group. Compare the infection status of patients in the endoscope room and the qualification of the air in the endoscope room before and after PDCA circulation management. Compare the respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and nursing satisfaction of patients in the Common group and the PDCA group. Compare the qualified rate of endoscopic cavity disinfection before and after PDCA cycle management, the qualified rate of endoscopic external disinfection, and the management score. Four patients in the Common group developed infection, with an infection rate of 4.44%. One case of infection occurred in the PDCA group, with an infection rate of 0.64%. The qualified rate of the endoscope room air in the Common group was 92.22%, while the qualified rate of the endoscope room air in the PDCA group was 98.72%. Compared with the Common group, the infection rate of patients in the PDCA group significantly decreased, and the qualified rate of air in the endoscope room significantly increased. The respiratory rate, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, nursing errors, and nursing complaint rates of patients in the PDCA group were significantly lower than those in the Common group, and nursing satisfaction was significantly higher than those in the Common group. The qualified rate of endoscopic cavity disinfection and endoscopic external disinfection in the PDCA group were significantly higher than those in the Common group. Compared with before management, the scores of post management, nursing safety, disinfection and isolation, instruments, theoretical tests, and operational tests of nursing personnel after management increased significantly. The PDCA cycle is well applied in nursing quality management and risk control in the digestive endoscope room. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10695484/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035885 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 5400
Xu, Yan
Shi, Chunhua
Liu, Yun
Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room
title Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room
title_full Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room
title_fullStr Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room
title_full_unstemmed Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room
title_short Application effect of PDCA circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room
title_sort application effect of pdca circulation on nursing quality management and risk control in digestive endoscopy room
topic 5400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695484/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035885
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyan applicationeffectofpdcacirculationonnursingqualitymanagementandriskcontrolindigestiveendoscopyroom
AT shichunhua applicationeffectofpdcacirculationonnursingqualitymanagementandriskcontrolindigestiveendoscopyroom
AT liuyun applicationeffectofpdcacirculationonnursingqualitymanagementandriskcontrolindigestiveendoscopyroom