Cargando…
Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study
Reconstruction of scalp defects is a complicated and challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons. This retrospective observational study assessed the effectiveness of using platelet-rich gel (PRG) versus the external tissue expansion technique (TET) in reconstructing scalp defects. The clinica...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695493/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036305 |
_version_ | 1785153576899706880 |
---|---|
author | Ai, Tao Wang, Jianbai Xu, Yanan |
author_facet | Ai, Tao Wang, Jianbai Xu, Yanan |
author_sort | Ai, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reconstruction of scalp defects is a complicated and challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons. This retrospective observational study assessed the effectiveness of using platelet-rich gel (PRG) versus the external tissue expansion technique (TET) in reconstructing scalp defects. The clinical data of 24 patients with scalp defects treated with PRG or external TET were collected from September 2018 to March 2022. Data on the wound characteristics, wound healing time, cost of treatment, visual analog scale, and observed wound healing status were collected. The mean wound healing times in the PRG and TET groups were 25.00 ± 5.77 and 13.58 ± 9.68 days, respectively (P < .05). The PRG group was significantly more cost-effective than the TET group (P < .05). TET treatment significantly increased patients’ postoperative pain, which decreased over time (P < .05), while PRG treatment caused no significant change in pain (P > .05). The 2 groups showed no tissue depression or color change after wound healing at follow-up, but the hair growth in the TET group was significantly better than that in the PRG group (P < .05). Compared with TET treatment of scalp defects, PRG is not only simple and painless but also has a low treatment cost and, more importantly, does not involve the risk of surgery and anesthesia. However, using TET to treat scalp defects requires the careful selection of appropriate cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10695493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106954932023-12-05 Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study Ai, Tao Wang, Jianbai Xu, Yanan Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Reconstruction of scalp defects is a complicated and challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons. This retrospective observational study assessed the effectiveness of using platelet-rich gel (PRG) versus the external tissue expansion technique (TET) in reconstructing scalp defects. The clinical data of 24 patients with scalp defects treated with PRG or external TET were collected from September 2018 to March 2022. Data on the wound characteristics, wound healing time, cost of treatment, visual analog scale, and observed wound healing status were collected. The mean wound healing times in the PRG and TET groups were 25.00 ± 5.77 and 13.58 ± 9.68 days, respectively (P < .05). The PRG group was significantly more cost-effective than the TET group (P < .05). TET treatment significantly increased patients’ postoperative pain, which decreased over time (P < .05), while PRG treatment caused no significant change in pain (P > .05). The 2 groups showed no tissue depression or color change after wound healing at follow-up, but the hair growth in the TET group was significantly better than that in the PRG group (P < .05). Compared with TET treatment of scalp defects, PRG is not only simple and painless but also has a low treatment cost and, more importantly, does not involve the risk of surgery and anesthesia. However, using TET to treat scalp defects requires the careful selection of appropriate cases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10695493/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036305 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 7100 Ai, Tao Wang, Jianbai Xu, Yanan Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study |
title | Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study |
title_full | Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study |
title_short | Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study |
title_sort | platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: a retrospective study |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695493/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aitao plateletrichgelversusexternaltissueexpansiontechniqueintreatingscalpdefectsaretrospectivestudy AT wangjianbai plateletrichgelversusexternaltissueexpansiontechniqueintreatingscalpdefectsaretrospectivestudy AT xuyanan plateletrichgelversusexternaltissueexpansiontechniqueintreatingscalpdefectsaretrospectivestudy |