Cargando…

Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study

Reconstruction of scalp defects is a complicated and challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons. This retrospective observational study assessed the effectiveness of using platelet-rich gel (PRG) versus the external tissue expansion technique (TET) in reconstructing scalp defects. The clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ai, Tao, Wang, Jianbai, Xu, Yanan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695493/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036305
_version_ 1785153576899706880
author Ai, Tao
Wang, Jianbai
Xu, Yanan
author_facet Ai, Tao
Wang, Jianbai
Xu, Yanan
author_sort Ai, Tao
collection PubMed
description Reconstruction of scalp defects is a complicated and challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons. This retrospective observational study assessed the effectiveness of using platelet-rich gel (PRG) versus the external tissue expansion technique (TET) in reconstructing scalp defects. The clinical data of 24 patients with scalp defects treated with PRG or external TET were collected from September 2018 to March 2022. Data on the wound characteristics, wound healing time, cost of treatment, visual analog scale, and observed wound healing status were collected. The mean wound healing times in the PRG and TET groups were 25.00 ± 5.77 and 13.58 ± 9.68 days, respectively (P < .05). The PRG group was significantly more cost-effective than the TET group (P < .05). TET treatment significantly increased patients’ postoperative pain, which decreased over time (P < .05), while PRG treatment caused no significant change in pain (P > .05). The 2 groups showed no tissue depression or color change after wound healing at follow-up, but the hair growth in the TET group was significantly better than that in the PRG group (P < .05). Compared with TET treatment of scalp defects, PRG is not only simple and painless but also has a low treatment cost and, more importantly, does not involve the risk of surgery and anesthesia. However, using TET to treat scalp defects requires the careful selection of appropriate cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106954932023-12-05 Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study Ai, Tao Wang, Jianbai Xu, Yanan Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Reconstruction of scalp defects is a complicated and challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons. This retrospective observational study assessed the effectiveness of using platelet-rich gel (PRG) versus the external tissue expansion technique (TET) in reconstructing scalp defects. The clinical data of 24 patients with scalp defects treated with PRG or external TET were collected from September 2018 to March 2022. Data on the wound characteristics, wound healing time, cost of treatment, visual analog scale, and observed wound healing status were collected. The mean wound healing times in the PRG and TET groups were 25.00 ± 5.77 and 13.58 ± 9.68 days, respectively (P < .05). The PRG group was significantly more cost-effective than the TET group (P < .05). TET treatment significantly increased patients’ postoperative pain, which decreased over time (P < .05), while PRG treatment caused no significant change in pain (P > .05). The 2 groups showed no tissue depression or color change after wound healing at follow-up, but the hair growth in the TET group was significantly better than that in the PRG group (P < .05). Compared with TET treatment of scalp defects, PRG is not only simple and painless but also has a low treatment cost and, more importantly, does not involve the risk of surgery and anesthesia. However, using TET to treat scalp defects requires the careful selection of appropriate cases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10695493/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036305 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 7100
Ai, Tao
Wang, Jianbai
Xu, Yanan
Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study
title Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study
title_full Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study
title_short Platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: A retrospective study
title_sort platelet-rich gel versus external tissue expansion technique in treating scalp defects: a retrospective study
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695493/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036305
work_keys_str_mv AT aitao plateletrichgelversusexternaltissueexpansiontechniqueintreatingscalpdefectsaretrospectivestudy
AT wangjianbai plateletrichgelversusexternaltissueexpansiontechniqueintreatingscalpdefectsaretrospectivestudy
AT xuyanan plateletrichgelversusexternaltissueexpansiontechniqueintreatingscalpdefectsaretrospectivestudy