Cargando…

Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock

OBJECTIVES: Compliance with the fluid bonus component of the SEP-1 (severe sepsis and septic shock management) bundle remains poor due to concerns for iatrogenic harm from fluid overload. We sought to assess whether patients who received focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) and were found to be fluid to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prevalska, Ina G., Tucker, Ryan V., England, Peter C., Fung, Christopher M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695585/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001015
_version_ 1785153598163779584
author Prevalska, Ina G.
Tucker, Ryan V.
England, Peter C.
Fung, Christopher M.
author_facet Prevalska, Ina G.
Tucker, Ryan V.
England, Peter C.
Fung, Christopher M.
author_sort Prevalska, Ina G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Compliance with the fluid bonus component of the SEP-1 (severe sepsis and septic shock management) bundle remains poor due to concerns for iatrogenic harm from fluid overload. We sought to assess whether patients who received focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) and were found to be fluid tolerant (FT) were more likely to receive the recommended 30 mL/kg fluid bolus within 3 hours of sepsis identification. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated, tertiary-care hospital in the United States. PATIENTS: Emergency department patients presenting with septic shock from 2018 to 2021. The primary exposure was receipt of FCU with identification of fluid tolerance 3 hours from onset of septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two of 1,024 patients with septic shock received FCU within 3 hours of sepsis onset. One hundred seventy-seven were determined to be FT. One hundred fifteen patients were determined to have poor fluid tolerance (pFT). FT patients were more likely to reach the recommended 30 mL/kg fluid bolus amount compared with pFT (FT 52.0% vs. pFT 31.3%, risk difference: 20.7%, [95% CI, 9.4–31.9]). Patients who did not receive FCU met the bolus requirement 34.3% of the time. FT patients received more fluid within 3 hours (FT 2,271 mL vs. pFT 1,646 mL, mean difference 625 mL [95% CI, 330–919]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between fluid tolerance FCU findings and compliance with 30 mL/kg bolus after adjustment for patient characteristics and markers of hemodynamic instability. FT with associated with a higher likelihood of meeting bolus requirement (odds ratio 2.17 [1.52–3.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients found to be FT by FCU were more likely to receive the recommended 30 mL/kg bolus in the SEP-1 bundle when compared with patients found with pFT or those that did not receive FCU. There was no difference between groups in 28-day mortality, vasopressor requirement, or need for mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106955852023-12-05 Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock Prevalska, Ina G. Tucker, Ryan V. England, Peter C. Fung, Christopher M. Crit Care Explor Observational Study OBJECTIVES: Compliance with the fluid bonus component of the SEP-1 (severe sepsis and septic shock management) bundle remains poor due to concerns for iatrogenic harm from fluid overload. We sought to assess whether patients who received focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) and were found to be fluid tolerant (FT) were more likely to receive the recommended 30 mL/kg fluid bolus within 3 hours of sepsis identification. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated, tertiary-care hospital in the United States. PATIENTS: Emergency department patients presenting with septic shock from 2018 to 2021. The primary exposure was receipt of FCU with identification of fluid tolerance 3 hours from onset of septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two of 1,024 patients with septic shock received FCU within 3 hours of sepsis onset. One hundred seventy-seven were determined to be FT. One hundred fifteen patients were determined to have poor fluid tolerance (pFT). FT patients were more likely to reach the recommended 30 mL/kg fluid bolus amount compared with pFT (FT 52.0% vs. pFT 31.3%, risk difference: 20.7%, [95% CI, 9.4–31.9]). Patients who did not receive FCU met the bolus requirement 34.3% of the time. FT patients received more fluid within 3 hours (FT 2,271 mL vs. pFT 1,646 mL, mean difference 625 mL [95% CI, 330–919]). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between fluid tolerance FCU findings and compliance with 30 mL/kg bolus after adjustment for patient characteristics and markers of hemodynamic instability. FT with associated with a higher likelihood of meeting bolus requirement (odds ratio 2.17 [1.52–3.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients found to be FT by FCU were more likely to receive the recommended 30 mL/kg bolus in the SEP-1 bundle when compared with patients found with pFT or those that did not receive FCU. There was no difference between groups in 28-day mortality, vasopressor requirement, or need for mechanical ventilation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10695585/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001015 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Prevalska, Ina G.
Tucker, Ryan V.
England, Peter C.
Fung, Christopher M.
Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock
title Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock
title_full Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock
title_fullStr Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock
title_short Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Findings of Fluid Tolerance and Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock
title_sort focused cardiac ultrasound findings of fluid tolerance and fluid resuscitation in septic shock
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695585/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001015
work_keys_str_mv AT prevalskainag focusedcardiacultrasoundfindingsoffluidtoleranceandfluidresuscitationinsepticshock
AT tuckerryanv focusedcardiacultrasoundfindingsoffluidtoleranceandfluidresuscitationinsepticshock
AT englandpeterc focusedcardiacultrasoundfindingsoffluidtoleranceandfluidresuscitationinsepticshock
AT fungchristopherm focusedcardiacultrasoundfindingsoffluidtoleranceandfluidresuscitationinsepticshock