Cargando…

Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments

The abilities to predict, explain, and control might arise out of operations on a common underlying representation or, conversely, from independent cognitive processes. We developed a novel experimental paradigm to explore how individuals might use probabilistic mental models in these three tasks, u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tikhonov, Roman, DeDeo, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695676/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00112
_version_ 1785153615571189760
author Tikhonov, Roman
DeDeo, Simon
author_facet Tikhonov, Roman
DeDeo, Simon
author_sort Tikhonov, Roman
collection PubMed
description The abilities to predict, explain, and control might arise out of operations on a common underlying representation or, conversely, from independent cognitive processes. We developed a novel experimental paradigm to explore how individuals might use probabilistic mental models in these three tasks, under varying levels of complexity and uncertainty. Participants interacted with a simple chatbot defined by a finite-state machine, and were then tested on their ability to predict, explain, and control the chatbot’s responses. When full information was available, performance varied significantly across the tasks, with control proving most robust to increased complexity, and explanation being the most challenging. In the presence of hidden information, however, performance across tasks equalized, and participants demonstrated an alternative neglect bias, i.e., a tendency to ignore less likely possibilities. A second, within-subject experimental design then looked for correlations between abilities. We did not find strong correlations, but the challenges of the task for the subjects limited our statistical power. To understand these effects better, a final experiment investigated the possibility of cross-training, skill transfer, or “zero-shot” performance: how well a participant, explicitly trained on one of the three tasks, could perform on the others without additional training. Here we found strong asymmetries: participants trained to control gained generalizable abilities to both predict and explain, while training on either prediction or explanation did not lead to transfer. This cross-training experiment also revealed correlations in performance; most notably between control and prediction. Our findings highlight the complex role of mental models, in contrast to task-specific heuristics, when information is partially hidden, and suggest new avenues for research into situations where the acquisition of general purpose mental models may provide a unifying explanation for a variety of cognitive abilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106956762023-12-05 Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments Tikhonov, Roman DeDeo, Simon Open Mind (Camb) Research Article The abilities to predict, explain, and control might arise out of operations on a common underlying representation or, conversely, from independent cognitive processes. We developed a novel experimental paradigm to explore how individuals might use probabilistic mental models in these three tasks, under varying levels of complexity and uncertainty. Participants interacted with a simple chatbot defined by a finite-state machine, and were then tested on their ability to predict, explain, and control the chatbot’s responses. When full information was available, performance varied significantly across the tasks, with control proving most robust to increased complexity, and explanation being the most challenging. In the presence of hidden information, however, performance across tasks equalized, and participants demonstrated an alternative neglect bias, i.e., a tendency to ignore less likely possibilities. A second, within-subject experimental design then looked for correlations between abilities. We did not find strong correlations, but the challenges of the task for the subjects limited our statistical power. To understand these effects better, a final experiment investigated the possibility of cross-training, skill transfer, or “zero-shot” performance: how well a participant, explicitly trained on one of the three tasks, could perform on the others without additional training. Here we found strong asymmetries: participants trained to control gained generalizable abilities to both predict and explain, while training on either prediction or explanation did not lead to transfer. This cross-training experiment also revealed correlations in performance; most notably between control and prediction. Our findings highlight the complex role of mental models, in contrast to task-specific heuristics, when information is partially hidden, and suggest new avenues for research into situations where the acquisition of general purpose mental models may provide a unifying explanation for a variety of cognitive abilities. MIT Press 2023-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10695676/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00112 Text en © 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For a full description of the license, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tikhonov, Roman
DeDeo, Simon
Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments
title Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments
title_full Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments
title_fullStr Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments
title_full_unstemmed Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments
title_short Prediction, Explanation, and Control: The Use of Mental Models in Dynamic Environments
title_sort prediction, explanation, and control: the use of mental models in dynamic environments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695676/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00112
work_keys_str_mv AT tikhonovroman predictionexplanationandcontroltheuseofmentalmodelsindynamicenvironments
AT dedeosimon predictionexplanationandcontroltheuseofmentalmodelsindynamicenvironments