Cargando…

2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) can benefit from potentially curative cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 40 months. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hübner, Martin, van Der Speeten, Kurt, Govaerts, Kim, de Hingh, Ignace, Villeneuve, Laurent, Kusamura, Shigeki, Glehen, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14368-5
_version_ 1785154450938134528
author Hübner, Martin
van Der Speeten, Kurt
Govaerts, Kim
de Hingh, Ignace
Villeneuve, Laurent
Kusamura, Shigeki
Glehen, Olivier
author_facet Hübner, Martin
van Der Speeten, Kurt
Govaerts, Kim
de Hingh, Ignace
Villeneuve, Laurent
Kusamura, Shigeki
Glehen, Olivier
author_sort Hübner, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) can benefit from potentially curative cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 40 months. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this evidence-based consensus were to define the indications for HIPEC, to select the preferred HIPEC regimens, and to define research priorities regarding the use of HIPEC for PM-CRC. METHODS: The consensus steering committee elaborated and formulated pertinent clinical questions according to the PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) method and assessed the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Standardized evidence tables were presented to an international expert panel to reach a consensus (4-point, weak and strong positive/negative) on HIPEC regimens and research priorities through a two-round Delphi process. The consensus was defined as ≥ 50% agreement for the 4-point consensus grading or ≥ 70% for either of the two combinations. RESULTS: Evidence was weak or very weak for 9/10 clinical questions. In total, 70/90 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (78%), with a consensus for 10/10 questions on HIPEC regimens. There was strong negative consensus concerning the short duration, high-dose oxaliplatin (OX) protocol (55.7%), and a weak positive vote (53.8–64.3%) in favor of mitomycin-C (MMC)-based HIPEC (preferred choice: Dutch protocol: 35 mg/m(2), 90 min, three fractions), both for primary cytoreduction and recurrence. Determining the role of HIPEC after CRS was considered the most important research question, regarded as essential by 85.7% of the panelists. Furthermore, over 90% of experts suggest performing HIPEC after primary and secondary CRS for recurrence > 1 year after the index surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, despite the negative results of PRODIGE 7, HIPEC could be conditionally recommended to patients with PM-CRC after CRS. While more preclinical and clinical data are eagerly awaited to harmonize the procedure further, the MMC-based Dutch protocol remains the preferred regimen after primary and secondary CRS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-023-14368-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10695877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106958772023-12-06 2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer Hübner, Martin van Der Speeten, Kurt Govaerts, Kim de Hingh, Ignace Villeneuve, Laurent Kusamura, Shigeki Glehen, Olivier Ann Surg Oncol Peritoneal Surface Malignancy BACKGROUND: Selected patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) can benefit from potentially curative cytoreductive surgery (CRS) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 40 months. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this evidence-based consensus were to define the indications for HIPEC, to select the preferred HIPEC regimens, and to define research priorities regarding the use of HIPEC for PM-CRC. METHODS: The consensus steering committee elaborated and formulated pertinent clinical questions according to the PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) method and assessed the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Standardized evidence tables were presented to an international expert panel to reach a consensus (4-point, weak and strong positive/negative) on HIPEC regimens and research priorities through a two-round Delphi process. The consensus was defined as ≥ 50% agreement for the 4-point consensus grading or ≥ 70% for either of the two combinations. RESULTS: Evidence was weak or very weak for 9/10 clinical questions. In total, 70/90 eligible panelists replied to both Delphi rounds (78%), with a consensus for 10/10 questions on HIPEC regimens. There was strong negative consensus concerning the short duration, high-dose oxaliplatin (OX) protocol (55.7%), and a weak positive vote (53.8–64.3%) in favor of mitomycin-C (MMC)-based HIPEC (preferred choice: Dutch protocol: 35 mg/m(2), 90 min, three fractions), both for primary cytoreduction and recurrence. Determining the role of HIPEC after CRS was considered the most important research question, regarded as essential by 85.7% of the panelists. Furthermore, over 90% of experts suggest performing HIPEC after primary and secondary CRS for recurrence > 1 year after the index surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, despite the negative results of PRODIGE 7, HIPEC could be conditionally recommended to patients with PM-CRC after CRS. While more preclinical and clinical data are eagerly awaited to harmonize the procedure further, the MMC-based Dutch protocol remains the preferred regimen after primary and secondary CRS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-023-14368-5. Springer International Publishing 2023-11-08 2024 /pmc/articles/PMC10695877/ /pubmed/37940803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14368-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
Hübner, Martin
van Der Speeten, Kurt
Govaerts, Kim
de Hingh, Ignace
Villeneuve, Laurent
Kusamura, Shigeki
Glehen, Olivier
2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer
title 2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer
title_full 2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer
title_fullStr 2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed 2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer
title_short 2022 Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International Consensus on HIPEC Regimens for Peritoneal Malignancies: Colorectal Cancer
title_sort 2022 peritoneal surface oncology group international consensus on hipec regimens for peritoneal malignancies: colorectal cancer
topic Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14368-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hubnermartin 2022peritonealsurfaceoncologygroupinternationalconsensusonhipecregimensforperitonealmalignanciescolorectalcancer
AT vanderspeetenkurt 2022peritonealsurfaceoncologygroupinternationalconsensusonhipecregimensforperitonealmalignanciescolorectalcancer
AT govaertskim 2022peritonealsurfaceoncologygroupinternationalconsensusonhipecregimensforperitonealmalignanciescolorectalcancer
AT dehinghignace 2022peritonealsurfaceoncologygroupinternationalconsensusonhipecregimensforperitonealmalignanciescolorectalcancer
AT villeneuvelaurent 2022peritonealsurfaceoncologygroupinternationalconsensusonhipecregimensforperitonealmalignanciescolorectalcancer
AT kusamurashigeki 2022peritonealsurfaceoncologygroupinternationalconsensusonhipecregimensforperitonealmalignanciescolorectalcancer
AT glehenolivier 2022peritonealsurfaceoncologygroupinternationalconsensusonhipecregimensforperitonealmalignanciescolorectalcancer