Cargando…
Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making
BACKGROUND: Whereas the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria restrict germline-genetic testing (GGT) to a subset of breast cancer (BC) patients, the American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends universal GGT. Although the yield of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in unselected B...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14394-3 |
_version_ | 1785154451398459392 |
---|---|
author | Shelton, Charles Ruiz, Antonio Shelton, Lauren Montgomery, Hannah Freas, Karen Ellsworth, Rachel E. Poll, Sarah Pineda-Alvarez, Daniel Heald, Brandie Esplin, Edward D. Nielsen, Sarah M. |
author_facet | Shelton, Charles Ruiz, Antonio Shelton, Lauren Montgomery, Hannah Freas, Karen Ellsworth, Rachel E. Poll, Sarah Pineda-Alvarez, Daniel Heald, Brandie Esplin, Edward D. Nielsen, Sarah M. |
author_sort | Shelton, Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whereas the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria restrict germline-genetic testing (GGT) to a subset of breast cancer (BC) patients, the American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends universal GGT. Although the yield of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in unselected BC patients has been studied, the practicality and utility of incorporating universal GGT into routine cancer care in community and rural settings is understudied. This study reports real-world implementation of universal GGT for patients with breast cancer and genetics-informed, treatment decision-making in a rural, community practice with limited resources. METHODS: From 2019 to 2022, all patients with breast cancer at a small, rural hospital were offered GGT, using a genetics-extender model. Statistical analyses included Fisher’s exact test, t-tests, and calculation of odds ratios. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 210 patients with breast cancer who were offered GGT, 192 (91.4%) underwent testing with 104 (54.2%) in-criteria (IC) and 88 (45.8%) out-of-criteria (OOC) with NCCN guidelines. Pathogenic germline variants were identified in 25 patients (13.0%), with PGV frequencies of 15 of 104 (14.4%) in IC and ten of 88 (11.4%) in OOC patients (p = 0.495). GGT informed treatment for 129 of 185 (69.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Universal GGT was successfully implemented in a rural, community practice with > 90% uptake. Treatment was enhanced or de-escalated in those with and without clinically actionable PGVs, respectively. Universal GGT for patients with breast cancer is feasible within rural populations, enabling optimization of clinical care to patients’ genetic profile, and may reduce unnecessary healthcare, resource utilization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-023-14394-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10695880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106958802023-12-06 Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making Shelton, Charles Ruiz, Antonio Shelton, Lauren Montgomery, Hannah Freas, Karen Ellsworth, Rachel E. Poll, Sarah Pineda-Alvarez, Daniel Heald, Brandie Esplin, Edward D. Nielsen, Sarah M. Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Whereas the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria restrict germline-genetic testing (GGT) to a subset of breast cancer (BC) patients, the American Society of Breast Surgeons recommends universal GGT. Although the yield of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in unselected BC patients has been studied, the practicality and utility of incorporating universal GGT into routine cancer care in community and rural settings is understudied. This study reports real-world implementation of universal GGT for patients with breast cancer and genetics-informed, treatment decision-making in a rural, community practice with limited resources. METHODS: From 2019 to 2022, all patients with breast cancer at a small, rural hospital were offered GGT, using a genetics-extender model. Statistical analyses included Fisher’s exact test, t-tests, and calculation of odds ratios. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of 210 patients with breast cancer who were offered GGT, 192 (91.4%) underwent testing with 104 (54.2%) in-criteria (IC) and 88 (45.8%) out-of-criteria (OOC) with NCCN guidelines. Pathogenic germline variants were identified in 25 patients (13.0%), with PGV frequencies of 15 of 104 (14.4%) in IC and ten of 88 (11.4%) in OOC patients (p = 0.495). GGT informed treatment for 129 of 185 (69.7%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Universal GGT was successfully implemented in a rural, community practice with > 90% uptake. Treatment was enhanced or de-escalated in those with and without clinically actionable PGVs, respectively. Universal GGT for patients with breast cancer is feasible within rural populations, enabling optimization of clinical care to patients’ genetic profile, and may reduce unnecessary healthcare, resource utilization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-023-14394-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-09 2024 /pmc/articles/PMC10695880/ /pubmed/37814187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14394-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Shelton, Charles Ruiz, Antonio Shelton, Lauren Montgomery, Hannah Freas, Karen Ellsworth, Rachel E. Poll, Sarah Pineda-Alvarez, Daniel Heald, Brandie Esplin, Edward D. Nielsen, Sarah M. Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making |
title | Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making |
title_full | Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making |
title_fullStr | Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making |
title_full_unstemmed | Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making |
title_short | Universal Germline-Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer: Implementation in a Rural Practice and Impact on Shared Decision-Making |
title_sort | universal germline-genetic testing for breast cancer: implementation in a rural practice and impact on shared decision-making |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37814187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14394-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheltoncharles universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT ruizantonio universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT sheltonlauren universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT montgomeryhannah universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT freaskaren universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT ellsworthrachele universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT pollsarah universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT pinedaalvarezdaniel universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT healdbrandie universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT esplinedwardd universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking AT nielsensarahm universalgermlinegenetictestingforbreastcancerimplementationinaruralpracticeandimpactonshareddecisionmaking |