Cargando…
Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect
The neural networks subserving smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) provide an ideal model for investigating the interaction of sensory processing and motor control during ongoing movements. To better understand core plasticity aspects of sensorimotor processing for SPEM, normative sham, anodal or ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38049419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48313-z |
_version_ | 1785154475211620352 |
---|---|
author | Radecke, Jan-Ole Sprenger, Andreas Stöckler, Hannah Espeter, Lisa Reichhardt, Mandy-Josephine Thomann, Lara S. Erdbrügger, Tim Buschermöhle, Yvonne Borgwardt, Stefan Schneider, Till R. Gross, Joachim Wolters, Carsten H. Lencer, Rebekka |
author_facet | Radecke, Jan-Ole Sprenger, Andreas Stöckler, Hannah Espeter, Lisa Reichhardt, Mandy-Josephine Thomann, Lara S. Erdbrügger, Tim Buschermöhle, Yvonne Borgwardt, Stefan Schneider, Till R. Gross, Joachim Wolters, Carsten H. Lencer, Rebekka |
author_sort | Radecke, Jan-Ole |
collection | PubMed |
description | The neural networks subserving smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) provide an ideal model for investigating the interaction of sensory processing and motor control during ongoing movements. To better understand core plasticity aspects of sensorimotor processing for SPEM, normative sham, anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied over visual area V5 and frontal eye fields (FEF) in sixty healthy participants. The identical within-subject paradigm was used to assess SPEM modulations by practice. While no specific tDCS effects were revealed, within- and between-session practice effects indicate plasticity of top-down extraretinal mechanisms that mainly affect SPEM in the absence of visual input and during SPEM initiation. To explore the potential of tDCS effects, individual electric field simulations were computed based on calibrated finite element head models and individual functional localization of V5 and FEF location (using functional MRI) and orientation (using combined EEG/MEG) was conducted. Simulations revealed only limited electric field target intensities induced by the applied normative tDCS montages but indicate the potential efficacy of personalized tDCS for the modulation of SPEM. In sum, results indicate the potential susceptibility of extraretinal SPEM control to targeted external neuromodulation (e.g., personalized tDCS) and intrinsic learning protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10695990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106959902023-12-06 Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect Radecke, Jan-Ole Sprenger, Andreas Stöckler, Hannah Espeter, Lisa Reichhardt, Mandy-Josephine Thomann, Lara S. Erdbrügger, Tim Buschermöhle, Yvonne Borgwardt, Stefan Schneider, Till R. Gross, Joachim Wolters, Carsten H. Lencer, Rebekka Sci Rep Article The neural networks subserving smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) provide an ideal model for investigating the interaction of sensory processing and motor control during ongoing movements. To better understand core plasticity aspects of sensorimotor processing for SPEM, normative sham, anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied over visual area V5 and frontal eye fields (FEF) in sixty healthy participants. The identical within-subject paradigm was used to assess SPEM modulations by practice. While no specific tDCS effects were revealed, within- and between-session practice effects indicate plasticity of top-down extraretinal mechanisms that mainly affect SPEM in the absence of visual input and during SPEM initiation. To explore the potential of tDCS effects, individual electric field simulations were computed based on calibrated finite element head models and individual functional localization of V5 and FEF location (using functional MRI) and orientation (using combined EEG/MEG) was conducted. Simulations revealed only limited electric field target intensities induced by the applied normative tDCS montages but indicate the potential efficacy of personalized tDCS for the modulation of SPEM. In sum, results indicate the potential susceptibility of extraretinal SPEM control to targeted external neuromodulation (e.g., personalized tDCS) and intrinsic learning protocols. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10695990/ /pubmed/38049419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48313-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Radecke, Jan-Ole Sprenger, Andreas Stöckler, Hannah Espeter, Lisa Reichhardt, Mandy-Josephine Thomann, Lara S. Erdbrügger, Tim Buschermöhle, Yvonne Borgwardt, Stefan Schneider, Till R. Gross, Joachim Wolters, Carsten H. Lencer, Rebekka Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect |
title | Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect |
title_full | Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect |
title_fullStr | Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect |
title_short | Normative tDCS over V5 and FEF reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect |
title_sort | normative tdcs over v5 and fef reveals practice-induced modulation of extraretinal smooth pursuit mechanisms, but no specific stimulation effect |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38049419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48313-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radeckejanole normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT sprengerandreas normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT stocklerhannah normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT espeterlisa normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT reichhardtmandyjosephine normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT thomannlaras normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT erdbruggertim normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT buschermohleyvonne normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT borgwardtstefan normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT schneidertillr normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT grossjoachim normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT wolterscarstenh normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect AT lencerrebekka normativetdcsoverv5andfefrevealspracticeinducedmodulationofextraretinalsmoothpursuitmechanismsbutnospecificstimulationeffect |