Cargando…

Psychosocial factors, dentist-patient relationships, and oral health-related quality of life: a structural equation modelling

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors and dentist-patient relationships (DPR) have been suggested to be associated with oral health outcomes. This study aimed to test a conceptual model which hypothesised relationships among psychosocial factors, DPR variables, and oral health-related quality of life (OH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Youngha, Luzzi, Liana, Brennan, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38049808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02214-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Psychosocial factors and dentist-patient relationships (DPR) have been suggested to be associated with oral health outcomes. This study aimed to test a conceptual model which hypothesised relationships among psychosocial factors, DPR variables, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in the ‘distal-to-proximal’ framework. METHODS: A total of 12,245 adults aged 18 years or over living in South Australia were randomly sampled for the study. Data were collected from self-complete questionnaires in 2015–2016. The outcome variable of Oral Health Impact Profile was used to measure OHRQoL. Psychosocial domain consisted of psychological well-being, social support, and health self-efficacy. DPR domain included trust in dentists, satisfaction with dental care, and dental fear. The hypothesised model was tested using the two-step approach in structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 3767 respondents after the screening/preparing process (adjusted valid response rate 37.4%). In the first step of the analysis, confirmatory factor analyses produced acceptable measurement models for each of the six latent variables (GFI = 0.95, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.04). The final structural model indicated that better well-being, higher self-efficacy, and more satisfaction were associated with lower oral health impact (β = − 0.12, − 0.07, − 0.14, respectively) whereas fear was positively associated (β = 0.19). Among intermediates, support was positively associated with satisfaction within a small effect size (β = 0.06) as compared to self-efficacy with trust (β = 0.22). The invariance of the final model was also confirmed on participants’ SES and dental service characteristics except the variable of ‘last dental visit’. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial factors and DPR variables were associated with oral health impact in both direct and indirect paths. The framework of ‘distal-to-proximal’ actions is empirically supported from psychosocial factors via DPR variables to OHRQoL. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-023-02214-x.