Cargando…
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Recently, both US and European guidelines have predominantly recommended coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the preferred revascularisation method. However, emerging data have raised the possibility of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) being a viable and effective alternative. This met...
Autores principales: | Hennessy, Conor, Henry, John, Parameswaran, Gokul, Brameier, Devon, Kharbanda, Rajesh, Myerson, Saul |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696914/ http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48297 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for the Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
por: Cho, Sang-Cheol, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
por: Kawecki, Damian, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Revascularization of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
por: Park, Sangwoo, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting in emergency and non-emergency unprotected left-main revascularization
por: Daoulah, Amin, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease
por: Davierwala, Piroze M, et al.
Publicado: (2021)