Tocilizumab Vs Methotrexate in a Cohort of Patients Affected by Active GCA: A Comparative Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study

INTRODUCTION: No head-to-head study has assessed the superiority of tocilizumab versus methotrexate in giant cell arteritis (GCA), and few studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in terms of ultrasonographic findings, but without a control group. The primary endpoint was to assess whether tocilizumab was superior to methotrexate in inducing normalization of US findings, whereas the secondary endpoint was to assess the effectiveness of precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled all the patients with active GCA at our clinic. The inclusion criteria were clinical diagnosis of GCA; active disease; and clinical, laboratory, and US data, evaluated using the halo count (HC) and OMERACT GCA Ultrasonography Score (OGUS). Evaluations were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with Tocilizumab and 9 with Methotrexate. All but three tocilizumab-treated patients achieved remission at six months, whereas at 12 months, all patients were in glucocorticoid-free remission. Up to three of the nine methotrexate patients experienced a lack of efficacy or minor relapses. Tocilizumab-treated patients showed a statistically significant difference between baseline and all follow-ups in terms of OGUS and HC, whereas the difference in the Methotrexate group was significant after 1 year. The mean glucocorticoid dosage significantly decreased in both groups. No severe adverse events or major relapses were reported. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the superiority in terms of rapidity of a tocilizumab-based scheme over a methotrexate-based scheme in inducing clinical and US remission. Precocious withdrawal of glucocorticoids did not increase the risk of relapse.