Cargando…

Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision

PURPOSE: To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandoval, Helga P, Potvin, Richard, Solomon, Kerry D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697088/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S442752
_version_ 1785154705095131136
author Sandoval, Helga P
Potvin, Richard
Solomon, Kerry D
author_facet Sandoval, Helga P
Potvin, Richard
Solomon, Kerry D
author_sort Sandoval, Helga P
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the enhanced IOL targeted for bilateral emmetropia or slight monovision (−0.75 D in the non-dominant eye). At 3 months the binocular visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with low contrast VA in photopic and mesopic conditions, and the distance corrected defocus curve. Questionnaires related to spectacle independence, satisfaction, visual symptoms, and functional vision were administered. RESULTS: Data from 71 subjects (34 Emmetropia, 37 Monovision) were analyzed. There was no difference in the mean uncorrected distance VA (p = 0.11), but uncorrected intermediate and near VAs were one line better in the Monovision group (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Mesopic and photopic low contrast VA were similar between groups. There was a trend for less difficulty and higher satisfaction with near and intermediate vision in the Monovision group, but no significant differences in any of the subjective questionnaires. Difficulty reading was the most reported concern in both groups, though 93% of all subjects reported “little” or “no” difficulty with daily activities. Overall, 82% of subjects were “completely” or “very” happy with their lens choice. CONCLUSION: Using this enhanced IOL with slight monovision in the non-dominant eye increased intermediate and near VA with no apparent effect on low contrast distance VA, subjective visual quality, or satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10697088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106970882023-12-06 Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision Sandoval, Helga P Potvin, Richard Solomon, Kerry D Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the enhanced IOL targeted for bilateral emmetropia or slight monovision (−0.75 D in the non-dominant eye). At 3 months the binocular visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with low contrast VA in photopic and mesopic conditions, and the distance corrected defocus curve. Questionnaires related to spectacle independence, satisfaction, visual symptoms, and functional vision were administered. RESULTS: Data from 71 subjects (34 Emmetropia, 37 Monovision) were analyzed. There was no difference in the mean uncorrected distance VA (p = 0.11), but uncorrected intermediate and near VAs were one line better in the Monovision group (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Mesopic and photopic low contrast VA were similar between groups. There was a trend for less difficulty and higher satisfaction with near and intermediate vision in the Monovision group, but no significant differences in any of the subjective questionnaires. Difficulty reading was the most reported concern in both groups, though 93% of all subjects reported “little” or “no” difficulty with daily activities. Overall, 82% of subjects were “completely” or “very” happy with their lens choice. CONCLUSION: Using this enhanced IOL with slight monovision in the non-dominant eye increased intermediate and near VA with no apparent effect on low contrast distance VA, subjective visual quality, or satisfaction. Dove 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10697088/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S442752 Text en © 2023 Sandoval et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Sandoval, Helga P
Potvin, Richard
Solomon, Kerry D
Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision
title Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision
title_full Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision
title_fullStr Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision
title_short Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision
title_sort comparing visual performance and subjective outcomes with an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens when targeted for emmetropia or monovision
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697088/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S442752
work_keys_str_mv AT sandovalhelgap comparingvisualperformanceandsubjectiveoutcomeswithanenhancedmonofocalintraocularlenswhentargetedforemmetropiaormonovision
AT potvinrichard comparingvisualperformanceandsubjectiveoutcomeswithanenhancedmonofocalintraocularlenswhentargetedforemmetropiaormonovision
AT solomonkerryd comparingvisualperformanceandsubjectiveoutcomeswithanenhancedmonofocalintraocularlenswhentargetedforemmetropiaormonovision