Cargando…
Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision
PURPOSE: To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697088/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S442752 |
_version_ | 1785154705095131136 |
---|---|
author | Sandoval, Helga P Potvin, Richard Solomon, Kerry D |
author_facet | Sandoval, Helga P Potvin, Richard Solomon, Kerry D |
author_sort | Sandoval, Helga P |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the enhanced IOL targeted for bilateral emmetropia or slight monovision (−0.75 D in the non-dominant eye). At 3 months the binocular visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with low contrast VA in photopic and mesopic conditions, and the distance corrected defocus curve. Questionnaires related to spectacle independence, satisfaction, visual symptoms, and functional vision were administered. RESULTS: Data from 71 subjects (34 Emmetropia, 37 Monovision) were analyzed. There was no difference in the mean uncorrected distance VA (p = 0.11), but uncorrected intermediate and near VAs were one line better in the Monovision group (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Mesopic and photopic low contrast VA were similar between groups. There was a trend for less difficulty and higher satisfaction with near and intermediate vision in the Monovision group, but no significant differences in any of the subjective questionnaires. Difficulty reading was the most reported concern in both groups, though 93% of all subjects reported “little” or “no” difficulty with daily activities. Overall, 82% of subjects were “completely” or “very” happy with their lens choice. CONCLUSION: Using this enhanced IOL with slight monovision in the non-dominant eye increased intermediate and near VA with no apparent effect on low contrast distance VA, subjective visual quality, or satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10697088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106970882023-12-06 Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision Sandoval, Helga P Potvin, Richard Solomon, Kerry D Clin Ophthalmol Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: To evaluate relative visual performance and subjective outcomes after implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance™ intraocular lens (IOL) targeted for bilateral emmetropia or monovision. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center randomized, patient-masked trial. Patients were implanted with the enhanced IOL targeted for bilateral emmetropia or slight monovision (−0.75 D in the non-dominant eye). At 3 months the binocular visual acuity (VA) was measured at distance, intermediate and near, along with low contrast VA in photopic and mesopic conditions, and the distance corrected defocus curve. Questionnaires related to spectacle independence, satisfaction, visual symptoms, and functional vision were administered. RESULTS: Data from 71 subjects (34 Emmetropia, 37 Monovision) were analyzed. There was no difference in the mean uncorrected distance VA (p = 0.11), but uncorrected intermediate and near VAs were one line better in the Monovision group (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Mesopic and photopic low contrast VA were similar between groups. There was a trend for less difficulty and higher satisfaction with near and intermediate vision in the Monovision group, but no significant differences in any of the subjective questionnaires. Difficulty reading was the most reported concern in both groups, though 93% of all subjects reported “little” or “no” difficulty with daily activities. Overall, 82% of subjects were “completely” or “very” happy with their lens choice. CONCLUSION: Using this enhanced IOL with slight monovision in the non-dominant eye increased intermediate and near VA with no apparent effect on low contrast distance VA, subjective visual quality, or satisfaction. Dove 2023-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10697088/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S442752 Text en © 2023 Sandoval et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Report Sandoval, Helga P Potvin, Richard Solomon, Kerry D Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision |
title | Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision |
title_full | Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision |
title_fullStr | Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision |
title_short | Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision |
title_sort | comparing visual performance and subjective outcomes with an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens when targeted for emmetropia or monovision |
topic | Clinical Trial Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697088/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S442752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandovalhelgap comparingvisualperformanceandsubjectiveoutcomeswithanenhancedmonofocalintraocularlenswhentargetedforemmetropiaormonovision AT potvinrichard comparingvisualperformanceandsubjectiveoutcomeswithanenhancedmonofocalintraocularlenswhentargetedforemmetropiaormonovision AT solomonkerryd comparingvisualperformanceandsubjectiveoutcomeswithanenhancedmonofocalintraocularlenswhentargetedforemmetropiaormonovision |